Had the Roku not been around, the Apple TV would most likely still be limited to just iTunes streaming and downloads.
I find that too many people discount the power of the ecosystem and the apple integration. I do not. I find that very important to me and I find no other company doing as good a job as Apple in this respect.
its true. I have apple tv sitting some where , i don't know. because of apple F@##ing closed system.. NO PLEX ..
I am happy with chromecast & plex app..
.. Before i had plans to buy appletv for each tv in home but nah
chromecast is much better in terms of openness ..
But it irks me as a consumer that I might want to buy 3 movies in a HD digital format, one of which is cheapest on Google, another is on sale at Apple, and the other is cheapest at Amazon, and I'm looking at some combination of 2-3 devices to watch those movies.
aTV might lose money on every device sold. I'm not sure. I'm surethough they make it up in spades from the content that people buy from itunes that they use on it.
Your not going to make much money selling $100 set top boxs. You make your money selling billions of dollars worth of content.
How come Apple never releases the numbers around ATV sales? They release everything else (iPhone, iPad, Macs... even iPod) but not ATV? Steve Jobs himself said it's a 'hobby', and if I want to use the IRS definition of hobby vs business, the #1 difference is profitability.
Since when is distributing other people's content a big money making business? I thought iTunes was basically a break even business?
You do realise that the A5 is based on the ARM cortex A9 and they pay a license to ARM for every processor they sell.
aTV might lose money on every device sold. I'm not sure. I'm surethough they make it up in spades from the content that people buy from itunes that they use on it.
Your not going to make much money selling $100 set top boxs. You make your money selling billions of dollars worth of content.
The easiest is purchasing all movies on DVD / BD and rip to MKV and, if you don't mind losing the subs or just burn the most important one into the picture, MP4 / m4v / mov.
The latter can be played by all the players you've listed natively and isn't locked down with DRM.
Oh good! I enjoy it when someone comes out and criticizes a product when its not yet found its feet.
I look forward to this guys opinion when the AppStore comes to AppleTV.
The easiest is purchasing all movies on DVD / BD and rip to MKV and, if you don't mind losing the subs or just burn the most important one into the picture, MP4 / m4v / mov.
The latter can be played by all the players you've listed natively and isn't locked down with DRM.
apple tv was there for years. i didn't even know roku existed. if it was so great, we should have heard about it, no?
I would never buy any streaming device. When I pay for something, I want something tangible in return which is not heavily reliant on the Internet and my download quota. I prefer a physical copy instead of DRM and region restrictions, which I refuse to accept and will not support. I control and decide where to play, no one else. I pay I play my way. Plus I prefer Blu-Ray, but not downloading 40GB per movie. Hell even the iTunes movies are not BD quality either, so why would I use their service?
I can buy a BD movie, make my own backup copy with no region restrictions, no DRM, play where and when I want, no downloads required, and have the original disc for a backup and BD quality as well. So why would I use the Internet route when Im paying more for less and I have to obtain it myself?