The problem with atv is that Apple tried to make it into a gaming platform with no gaming controller. Why they thought that would work is beyond me. Kinda as stupid as the HomePod not having Bluetooth while trying to be an upscale speaker...Do any of these devices provide any storage or game performance ability or or the strictly stream only?
Do any of these devices provide any storage or game performance ability or or the strictly stream only?
While I don't agree that Roku is a nothing company. Apple is not and will not ever sell a TV unless the cable tv market is hurting. It needs the situation to be like the pathetic state ATT was back in the early 2000's, when it was named Cingular. Only then will they be opened to "real" changes and not the crap that Comcast, Cablevision and Verizon dribble out every year.Unless Apple makes a display they won’t be crushing anyone. Samsung, Sony, Vizio, etc are all players bringing different things to the table across this space. Apple is the one who is best served being more concerned with ‘services’.
It's like apple Is giving less and less reasons to buy an Apple TV. AFTER I ALREADY BOUGHT TWO
Would be nice. We have 3 sharp Roku TVs and my mom has 1.
It's more than just because they haven't made it a priority. It's also price. Amazon and Google are flooding the market with cheap, but very usable devices. The much larger, more expensive Apple TV has no real advantages over these other devices if you are not purchasing exclusively from the iTunes store or use the Apple TV as a Homekit hub, therefore, decoupling the service from relying on specific hardware is a required move, not a power play, especially if they aren't going to compete on the low end.Only because they haven't made it a priority. Apple can buy NFLX if they want to lead the industry today.
They aren't going to do that, because the industry is not profitable enough yet.
ROKU is by far my favorite of all the set top boxes. The ATV is just awful.
Having Apple Music and AirPlay (for photos and short videos) on my TCL Roku tv would make me VERY happy. I don’t love the Roku experience, but it’s ok. And the tv is very nice for how stupid cheap it was.
This is to push apple’s services revenue and make way for their streaming service. Makes sense for everyone.
Well there is the nVidia Shield which is more or less similarly priced as the Apple TV 4K. I'm not trying to defend the Apple TV 4K but still only Amazon has Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos support as well, those come with licensing fees. I think its fairly priced in a way in that sense.I totally agree with you on Apple Watch, but on the TV side of things, if you want 4K playback:
AppleTV 4K: $179+
Chromecast Ultra: $69
Amazon FireTV Stick with 4K: $39
Roku Premiere: $39
That's not fairly priced to me for what you get.
Well there is the nVidia Shield which is more or less similarly priced as the Apple TV 4K. I'm not trying to defend the Apple TV 4K but still only Amazon has Dolby Vision and Dolby Atmos support as well, those come with licensing fees. I think its fairly priced in a way in that sense.
ROKU is by far my favorite of all the set top boxes. The ATV is just awful.
Unless Apple makes a display they won’t be crushing anyone. Samsung, Sony, Vizio, etc are all players bringing different things to the table across this space. Apple is the one who is best served being more concerned with ‘services’.
Did Apple change their policy on ratings for shows? Or is it still going to be family friendly stuff?This is obviously just like the new Samsung TVs. Apple offers airplay 2 in exchange for putting iTunes being on Rokus for their upcoming streaming service.