I really hope not. 😱Maybe their perception of hifi audio was tested on the HomePod mini.
Apple claiming their 256Kbps AAC files is CD quality though. I have tested it with my own CD uploaded to Apple Music compared to the original CD playing from another Mac. Both are played to HomePods paired as stereo and both sound identical. There might be difference but I didn't hear it so I can't fault Apple claim.
That doesn't mean it's lossless though. It's not. It's just for your ears it's CD quality.
And I don't mean it is lossless, as stated very clear in my previous post. I'm just saying the Apple claim holds true for me that it is CD quality for my ears.256 is not cd quality
the fact that you don’t hear a difference says more about home pods than it does 1,411 wav vs 256 aac
And I don't mean it is lossless, as stated very clear in my previous post. I'm just saying the Apple claim holds true for me that it is CD quality for my ears.
The word quality can be subjective. Apple never claim AAC is lossless.
No I know my speakers. My friend has a listening room with $20,000 speakers. I know how some albums sound. HomePods paired as stereo is quite good. (the big one not a mini)i’m saying it but not be your ears but rather your speakers
Apple and "Free" in the same sentence, nope. It's another revenue stream.
aptx is a competing standard, and Apple doesn’t own it. If Apple use it, they will enrich the competitors and will be forced to pay royalties.It's my understanding (and could be wrong) that all Apple headphones max out at 256kbps AAC and anything else is converted down. So an uplift in music quality necessitates purchasing new hardware, too.
It would be nice if Apple supported aptx so those with headphones that support this can benefit.
Route Incompatible" and "Route Unknown Compatibility" suggests that much like how Spatial Audio is limited to only the AirPods Pro and AirPods Max, HiFi Apple Music streaming could be exclusive to certain generation AirPods and other compatible devices. I’ll wait until there is testing to show real world experience not just antidotal golden ear ones. On the other hand, I’m the type of listener that listens to the music, not my equipment.Releasing hi-fi audio with a hardware that does not produce hi-fi sound?
Releasing hi-fi audio with a hardware that does not produce hi-fi sound?
Releasing hi-fi audio with a hardware that does not produce hi-fi sound?
Now thankfully the static and buzzing issues seem to have went away. But I’ve always had issues with them charging, even with the AirPods and case clean as a whistle. Just this morning I woke up with my right one at 0% battery. This has happened with multiple replacements. I blame poor design, as this has never happened with my gen 1 or gen 2 regular AirPods.the airpods pro have terrible build quality. just keep getting them replaced and hopefully they swap it out for an airpods pro 2 by the time it comes out.....unless you ran out of apple care
Random thought - what if it’s not hifi sound but instead, some sort of 3D spatial audio that takes advantage of existing hardware in your iOS devices and AirPods Pro / Max?
For example, imagine listening to classical music and being able to hear where each instrument is coming from, as though you were actually sitting in the room itself.
The music wouldn’t necessarily be higher quality, but would still make for a better listening experience in its own way. It would be a cool way for Apple to further leverage their hardware / software integration in a way that competitors can’t.
As long as you don't depend on algos to discover new music, get new playlists etc. Apple Music is the worst of breed when it comes to this.Spotify gonna cry so hard if true. They really need to up their game, otherwise im moving over to Apple Music.
Not gonna happen imho. Pretty sure Apple will unveil their own high quality codec which will be activated with a FW upgrade on the Max and the Pro and will be included in the new AirPods 3Hopefully AirPods max will support hifi audio transmission and we won’t have to upgrade to AirPods max pro
I wonder will Apple roll out both the AirPods 3 and AirPods Pro 2 together using the H2 Bluetooth chip?
No pros expected until later in the year most likely.So just to be clear - NO mention of expectations of AirPod PROS with this announcement, right? I've been waiting for awhile to pull the trigger on a new set of AirPods (but planning for the Pros), since I'm going from version1 AirPods and their battery life is about 20 minutes haha. I thought that AirPod Pros would've been included in this mix of updates but I guess not? Maybe go ahead and pull the trigger on the Pros the next time a good deal rolls around...
I understand the wireless angle, but not everybody uses apple music in wireless mode.Not sure how much Apple cares about the handful of people with lightning headphones that have onboard DAC and the ability to translate lossless music. I used to have a set, but they broke.
No one is transmitting lossless audio over bluetooth unless it's Apple doing it in their proprietary way, so that's why it would be restricted to AirPods and Beats, at least for wireless headphones.
Yeah, but my iPod Classic can’t be tracked, is free…forever, and will still be playing music long after civilisation collapses. Top that, Captain Competitive.My phone can hold 100000 songs.