Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’m not sure why people are worrying about their watch alerting them to this. It’s hardly going to be big flashing lights saying, 'YOU'RE PANICKING, don’t panic, why are you panicking?'. Much more likely that your watch will buzz, and say something like, 'it's good to take a moment to relax from time to time, try this breathing exercise', with other settings so that close family etc can be alerted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage and Ankaa
The Fitbit Ionic was released in September 2017, the Versa in April 2018, the Charge 3 in October 2018, all having blood oxygen sensors. It wasn't until January 2020 that Fitbit enabled the readout from its blood oxygen sensor from these devices in a user-facing way (and even then with only showing its trend over time and not absolute values).

It has been said that Apple Watch had the same sensing capabilities for a similar amount of time but like Fitbit wouldn't expose those capabilities because they weren't sure enough about the quality of the data and/or needed to figure out a way to present its results without falling foul of medical device regulations.

I hope Apple with Watch os 7 will do the same with blood oxygen and sleep tracker at least with AW4 and AW5
 
Mmm. Not sure how useful is this. Having a panic attack is pretty damn obvious when it happens. You don’t really need a watch to make you aware of it. It would be more interesting to see how the watch would help you get out of the panic attack.
 
The panic attack feature won’t be happening this year. That kind of feature is a few years down the line.
[automerge]1589030591[/automerge]
Siri will be diagnosing your mental health problems!

This is not going to end well.
“Did you say metal hairband promiscuity? I found several references online with 2 fairly close to you.”
 
Cool, but I honestly don't need my watch telling me I'm feeling anxiety or having a panic attack. The sweat, dizziness, nausea, heart feeling like its about to burst out of my chest like the alien in the movie "Alien." is an obvious sign. 😆😐
With the article saying it could advise people to pull off the road, it sounds like it may have some predictive value - to let you know you are approaching a panic attack before it is obvious. I'm not really prone to anxiety attacks but my AW heart rate alarm did go off once when I had a Red Bull and Vodka. I was fine but it did cause my heart rate to spike briefly. That was the first and last time I had one of those drinks 😂
 
that's awesome. and then can the watch do this?

giphy.gif
 
If this can help reduce the severity of panic attacks, it could be a most useful feature.
 
If you're worried about a panic attack, then just go to your doctor and get drugged up, that is what most people do nowadays.
 
You mean people might get a panic attack if their watch warns them about a heart issue?

No, I a not on how heart monitoring and "EKG-capabilities" have been criticised by professionals.

When it comes to panic attacks, the problem I see is that it is partly an issue that is countered by behavioural therapy. Constantly getting reminded of "you're about to have a panic attack" might not be the best, but I guess for some people it might help. For a hypochondriac person (and there seem to be many of them) this can straight up be other self-reinforcing, positive feedback loop. Somewhat related is this:
in a group where side-effects were told the occurrence was elevated compared to the control.

This can increase costs (though who knows what the overall balance is), but I wouldn't call it dangerous unless you have a system where high costs are the reason not everybody has access to healthcare.

I'd argue you can look at it from the supply/demand perspective if more people go to doctors, it will become more expensive, everything else equal. Healthcare is expensive partly because of inefficiencies, such as people seeking up the doctor unnecessarily, you can come up with a measures that will decrease the unnecessary visits, but many of these features are for early detection (with a ******** of false positives) rather than monitoring of actual condition. The use of Apple Watch as an alternative, often cheaper and more user friendly solution to heart monitors I do see as a positive. But for large portion of user base, younger, tech savvy people for example are not in the risk zone and whatever warning they receive is likely to be in

You can look at all kind of safety measures (eg, smoke detectors), the danger from people feeling safer and being less careful is almost always outweighed by the benefits.

I agree, there is trade-off, but it is not clear where to draw that line and it is hard to model people's behaviour. Being less careful has been documented in other areas of research, with somewhat unintuitive results:
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: NetMage
Panic attacks come from hundreds of catalysts - not all of them are hyperventilation or increase in heart rate. Plenty of them don't even demonstrate a drop in oxygen level. Some come from silent migraines, dizziness from ear disfunction... hypothyroidism which actually produce slow heart rates and a drop in blood pressure, or an undiagnosed diabetes. List is huge. If anything, this thing could spawn MORE panic attacks while people are trying to do healthy things in an unhealthy body.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simonmet
As someone who's had panic attacks before, drawing attention to it, especially if it's only the beginning stages of one, just tends to make it worse (I've been able to avert one by getting my mind off of it).

I concur this.
Also, having had panic attack problems for the last 17 years, no it can't detect panic attacks just by looking at the oxygen blood levels. That is not possible.
 
Last edited:
Another reason for me NOT to by this big-brother’s-watching-you device!!!
You are sorely misinformed about the Apple Watch. It isn’t tied to government Big Brother, or any other Orwellian conspiracy.

A user is informed about the different abilities of the watch, and he or she gives consent to invoke the various functions.

The watch isn’t even close to Big Brother government / company intrusion.
 
I’ve suffered with anxiety for years and have always wondered if Apple would ever include such a feature in a future release. It’s always made sense to me considering how a rapid heart rate is typically the epicenter of a panic attack, and the heart rate monitor on the watch is really quite good. If they pair this with some advanced AI and machine learning to accurately alert users of an attack, then this could really be helpful for folks like me! It could give me enough time to pull over if I’m in my car or take medication, if it’s able to predict one coming on, that is.
[automerge]1589048129[/automerge]
Another reason for me NOT to by this big-brother’s-watching-you device!!!
Dude wtf are you talking about take off your ****ing tin foil hat. You’re just embarrassing yourself...
 
I don't think this is true or if it is, I don' think it will work accurately detect panic attacks. The panic itself is largely induced by increased carbon dioxide, not oxygen. I've had panic attacks while wearing a pulse ox, and I have not seen a change. A plethysmograph can also detect breathing rate, like in the MightySat, which might give a better clue, but the problem is that there are so many physiological states that could cause increased breathing rate and pulse besides panic that the feature would be useless except to say "something is wrong."
This. Completely agree. Your blood oxygen saturation levels should be normal before you're hyperventilating (normal breathing). They'll still be normal when you're hyperventilating. The only thing that will really change with rapid breathing will be carbon dioxide levels. (The faster you breathe, the more CO2 you blow off, which was some of the logic behind the old school (and no longer recommended) remedy of breathing into a paper bag. If I rebreathe my exhaled CO2 my CO2 level won't drop!).

Monitoring HR/breathing rate might have a hard time distinguishing between a workout vs a panic attack.

I hope if they do put a pulse oximeter in the watch that it's a good one, and that it can detect/gives you the ability to see the pulse ox waveform (like the mightysat) so you know if the reading is accurate. Pulse oximeters, when not getting a clean read/good waveform have a tendency to report erroneously low levels...
I should be quoting others as well, not singling you out. Inserting the medical perspective here:
- Panics are not typically induced by CO2 levels, they are induced by thoughts or sensations. You can’t spontaneous change your blood carbon dioxide and then panic.
- The hyperventilation of a panic attack blows off CO2 and causes levels to drop, called hypocarbia, not to rise. Among other things this has neurological consequences, such as visual changes, and tingling of the lips and extremities. You can even try it on purpose (in a safe position and space; don’t pass out!). Countering this is what the traditional brown bag is for.
- Panic attacks typically cause hyperventilation and tachycardia. The new Apple Watch may be able to detect both.
- True that other things can cause both. One is pain (let’s assume you’ll know if you have pain) and another is exercise (let’s assume you’ll know if you’re exercising).
- Another thing that can cause both is a heart attack. If the panic alarm triggers, the next step would be to use the AW to check your EKG. It could alert in the case of a STEMI.
- There are still others that can cause both, such as pulmonary embolus and shock. Neither Apple nor anyone else is going to produce a device that is universally accurate. As biometric modalities are added, diagnostic accuracy will improve, and things that an AW can detect will broaden.
- As others have noted, one problem with an Apple Watch detecting panic attacks (or, more accurately, a couple of signs that accompany panic attacks) is the self-fulfilling prophesy of making somebody at risk of panic attacks anxious about having a panic attack.

Hope this cleared up some misunderstandings.
 
Panic attack detector. Yeah why don't they invest in something that is actually useful and treat a real/more important medical condition like a blood sugar reader.
Just because it is more important to you makes it more important?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ankaa and NetMage
Panic attack detector. Yeah why don't they invest in something that is actually useful and treat a real/more important medical condition like a blood sugar reader.
Companies have been working on the game changer of noninvasive blood glucose monitoring for decades, and this includes companies not new to the heath care space. (I’ve been following a couple but so far no IPO!) It’s notoriously unreliable thus far but as with most things progress is being made. You want Apple to will it into existence now? You want Apple not to come up with any AW biometrics until that one? Anything besides blood glucose you’re wishing for or is this your one pet metric?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ankaa
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.