Exactly my thoughts. I mean who cares about the damn Atom anyway...
Personally, I think it is unfair of those Netbook folks installing MacOSX. Apple should lock them out. I had to pay Apple's hardware premium to use their software, they should too. Apple probably will lock them out regardless of the table to protect the hardware margins. I think they are on the tightrope now between protecting margins and keeping the hacker base happy.
FakeWozniak said:Personally, I think it is unfair of those Netbook folks installing MacOSX. Apple should lock them out. I had to pay Apple's hardware premium to use their software, they should too. Apple probably will lock them out regardless of the table to protect the hardware margins. I think they are on the tightrope now between protecting margins and keeping the hacker base happy.
I say disable it now.
This is how things get out of hand. We all know it isn't "supported" but it works and people are using it. The problem is even if it isn't "supported" the more people that use it the more complaints/bad press Apple will get when it is finally pulled or it breaks.
I can confirm that Max OS X 10.6.2 does not work on my Radio Shack TRS-80. Damn Apple and their short-sighted greed.
You should have used the 16K upgrade pack like I did on my old CoCo1 Trash 80. The original 4K was rocking, though. Genuine Microsoft 9 color system.
Personally, I think it is unfair of those Netbook folks installing MacOSX. Apple should lock them out. I had to pay Apple's hardware premium to use their software, they should too. Apple probably will lock them out regardless of the table to protect the hardware margins. I think they are on the tightrope now between protecting margins and keeping the hacker base happy.
Its funny how the hackintosh community and tech news sites had a **** fest over something in a developer build, where bugs are worked out. I also really hope tech journalism hasn't stooped to basing claims off one user's feedback on a forum...
Why do you care what other people payed for their system? Do you get upset at Mac mini owners because you own an iMac? Or MacBook owners because you own a MacBook Pro?
The Hackintosh community as a whole probably accounts for less than one percent of the Mac user base. Apple could careless. By design, its always going to be limited to enthusiasts.
If a third-party OEM started getting Hacktintosh machines into retail channels, Apple would start caring. Otherwise, they should have better things to do with their time.
That is the dumbest logic I've ever heard. No one cares what you paid. Some people want products Apple doesn't offer, such as, oh, I dunno, a netbook, but with Apple software installed. I can't help it if you don't fit into this category.
You call the fake version of a man who is happy to stand in line and pay full price for Apple gear even though the company offered to send him free stuff. A man who no doubt also has a small fleet of Hackintoshs to mess around with, just because he can.
Then post that...
Delicious Irony
Why do you care what other people payed for their system? Do you get upset at Mac mini owners because you own an iMac? Or MacBook owners because you own a MacBook Pro?
The Hackintosh community as a whole probably accounts for less than one percent of the Mac user base. Apple could careless. By design, its always going to be limited to enthusiasts.
If a third-party OEM started getting Hacktintosh machines into retail channels, Apple would start caring. Otherwise, they should have better things to do with their time.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5H11a Safari/525.20)
That is the dumbest logic I've ever heard. No one cares what you paid. Some people want products Apple doesn't offer, such as, oh, I dunno, a netbook, but with Apple software installed. I can't help it if you don't fit into this category.
And to use the old cliché... life isn't fair
Ha, ha, ha. I'll take this as a little reminder not to pay too much attention to MR articles.
PLEASE DELIVER 10.6.2 NOW !!!
I don't want to believe that they are still spending any time around atom, while we need the update NOW ! I want to use safari again !
Why do you care what other people payed for their system? Do you get upset at Mac mini owners because you own an iMac? Or MacBook owners because you own a MacBook Pro?
The Hackintosh community as a whole probably accounts for less than one percent of the Mac user base. Apple could careless. By design, it’s always going to be limited to enthusiasts.
If a third-party OEM started getting Hacktintosh machines into retail channels, Apple would start caring. Otherwise, they should have better things to do with their time.
I think the interest isn't so much about hackintoshes which are by definition hobbiest activities. It is about speculation that Snow Leopard 10.6.x being compatible with Atom on the theory some future Tablet might use it. Whatever PA Semi is doing is compatible, perhaps even driving the very existence of Snow Leopard itself.
10.5 was a lark and bridge to 10.6. Vista was an abortion leading to Windows 7. Two competitors with similar strategies/experiences.
W7 goes to more powerful laptop solutions. SL goes to more powerful handtop solutions. Everybody here knows who wins this one. The company with the highest margins and growth rate wins. Period.
Rocketman
It really can't be hard for them to make a small MacBook for around the same price as a HP Mini.