What would happen if Samsung said "right Apple,no more of our hardware to be used in your products...oh and well your at it stop using 3G which we patented"...every person that wanted mobile data would have to buy a Samsung..lol...mind you the new Galaxy Nexus does put the iphone4S to shame.....
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Samsung Also Seeking to Ban iPhone 4S Sales in Japan and Australia
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I'm going to buy an iPhone 4S because I like the integration (the whole sharing of pics and footage across all the iDevices through the iCloud is cool, although I am getting sick of all the i-prefixes) and the camera is beyond awesome. There are some HD comparisons between the 4S and a Canon 5D mkII, and once the HD 1080p footage is compressed to a web format, it is very difficult to tell them apart, which is fine for my needs.
You would've thought that people in this thread were paid by Apple to post on this board. Samsung is doing what Apple did/started.
Either both are wrong or both are right.
IMO demanding bans was a bad move from Apple, cause what if Samsung bans the next iPhone in my country? Will I not get the iPhone? They should've just asked for cash or something like that. But obviously they knew Samsung would just rearrange the code and were basically just out to damage Samsung's brand name. It's a hard business, and you've got to play foul. IMO you should play hard, but not foul if it's against your biggest partner.
Either both are wrong or both are right.
IMO demanding bans was a bad move from Apple, cause what if Samsung bans the next iPhone in my country? Will I not get the iPhone? They should've just asked for cash or something like that. But obviously they knew Samsung would just rearrange the code and were basically just out to damage Samsung's brand name. It's a hard business, and you've got to play foul. IMO you should play hard, but not foul if it's against your biggest partner.
What about it? No file system, no memory card support, primitive 4 year old interface, no widgets, no real multitasking. Great music player but that's not good enough.
I'm not too experienced in iOS or Android, but Android is a multi-brand OS when iOS supports around ten devices at maximum (considering old iDevices that are eligible to upgrade iOS). In general, cohesion tends to pay its dividends. Android has an overhead as it needs a more portable driver architecture. I tend to believe that iOS is more stable and user-friendly than Android.
However, I think both are far better than Nokia operating systems. N9, the next Nokia high-end smartphone, will probably support both Windows Phone and MeeGo. Other Nokia smartphones run Symbian ^3/Anna/Belle; Nokia low-end phones run a monotask version of Symbian (S40). This makes a big headache when providing bugfixes. Nokia should split its operations into three companies: Windows Phone Nokia, MeeGo Nokia and Symbian Nokia so engineers would feel better and less tripolar.
However, I think both are far better than Nokia operating systems. N9, the next Nokia high-end smartphone, will probably support both Windows Phone and MeeGo. Other Nokia smartphones run Symbian ^3/Anna/Belle; Nokia low-end phones run a monotask version of Symbian (S40). This makes a big headache when providing bugfixes. Nokia should split its operations into three companies: Windows Phone Nokia, MeeGo Nokia and Symbian Nokia so engineers would feel better and less tripolar.
I think nokia should just drop Symbian and stick with Windows Phone. Windows phones needs more market share. Nokia has the biggest marketshare of phones. Win win.
