Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1.2tb in a stamp size woah very nice! Doesn't surprise me considering you can get microsd cards w 256gb and more nowadays.
 
Awesome technology. No doubt Apple will be implementing this into their products as soon as they can price it appropriately (I wouldn't be surprised if a postage-stamp 512 GB SSD currently costs $1000+ all on its own- before you put it in a computer).

Personally I'd like to see them put it in their devices and fill up the free space with battery instead of thinning their devices down even further. But that's just me. Soon my iPhone will double as a nail sharpener.
 
Bring it on. I'm more interested in the expected side effect of $/GB dropping, of which this should hopefully be a contributing factor.
 
Have there been any studies about the reliability of these growingly complex SSD's vs traditional spinning drives? Just curious....

Yes.

SSD's are simpler than spinning hard drives, much simpler.
 
I'm sure Apple will rush to get this soldered and non-upgradable storage into the Macs as soon as possible!
I'm wondering when we may see a 3rd-party auxiliary base that you clip under your ever-so-thin MBP (similar to an iPhone battery case), utilizing a fast TB3 connection and offering space for "normal" (i.e. cheap) 2.5" SSD's, some battery pack (at least the USB-C port on the 12" rMB is not patented) and perhaps even an external GPU. Edit: Note to myself: After reading the latest rumor about the claimed top case leak - add an option for a card reader as well.

Even more elegant would be a construction that would replace the existing MBP base lid. As the motherboard is affixed to the top case, exchanging the base lid would be a question of getting out the screws and putting the new housing extension on. Piece of cake.

With the rumored thinness reduction in upcoming MBP's the whole construction may be as thin (or "thick" by Apple's measures) as current gen devices. And even if older machines would become a bit thicker, probably quite some people would happily accept that tradeoff for some clean solution for external storage expansion.

Perhaps I should make myself familiar with design programs for 3D printers ...
 
Last edited:
Samsung is probably saying to Apple: can't innovate my ass!! It's a shame Apple won't take advantage of this in many years, or worse, it will charge you an arm and a leg to upgrade.

Can't believe Apple (the same company that got rid of CD/DVD drives and now USB ports and even allegedly headphone jacks) still has the guts to sell computes with spinning hard drives as their standard option.
[doublepost=1464735355][/doublepost]
Cant innovate anymore my ass.


oh wait, this is samsung?
Wow, we just had the same thought...
 
First of all, this is great.
Second, I wonder if the limit of 512 is about physical limit or a business decision.

This. Still, 512 in this size is amazing. Now, Apple, put this in my phone, thankyouverymuch.
 
These won't be seen in a mac for another decade, sorry peeps.

Apart from Apple have been using the latest Samsung PCI-E flash storage modules in every single refresh of Macbook Pro and iMac - and the Macbook Pro actually had a 1TB version of the fastest Samsung module they'd ever made which wasn't even available to buy on the open market, but you know, no one cared to both writing about that because they were too busy making repetitive jokes about 16gb iPhones and things being thinner.
 
amazing.
Apple can now fit more battery into their phones & macbooks :eek:

. . .
jk Let's make that **** thinner :rolleyes:
 
Now _that's_ innovation.

Meanwhile, Apple shave off 0.1mm and battery life decreases 10%!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.