I had no idea this existed.
Samsung should sue Apple for using this design language on the iPhone 6.
Safely mount off your high horse before getting thrown off. Seriously, if you can't even see what the reality is, let me tell you:
- Built in wireless charging
- 3GB DDR4 RAM
- Minimum 32GB storage.
- Much improved camera (we shall see by how much)
- Industry leading 14nm 8 core processor.
- incredibly quick charging
- 2k Amoled screen
If you can't even remotely see the innovation here, because your so bent on hating, then please go ahead and sell your Note 4 if it makes you feel better.
But to be honest very little room to innovate in the phone space. Although the force press technology on iPhone screens (i.e. Apple watch) is the first bit of true innovation in years.
It's one thing to say that Apple Pay is adopting at break-neck speed but it impressive that Samsung can say over 90% right now.
Is Samsung pay less secure since it just broadcasts the magnetic field, making it easier to intercept?
Welcome back to 2012 Samsung. Seriously.Samsung Pay
3 colors, gold, silver, black
Non removable battery
No micro SD slot
Similar hardware design
Similar storage options
Welcome to the Samsung iPhone S6.
Manufactured in Korea, designed by Apple in California.
Looks like a great phone. The only problem is that it uses Android. No matter what you think about ios8 it's still far more usable than the horrid android OS.
I love how when apple named everything iThis and iThat. Samsung named everything sThis and sThat. Now that new Apple products are being named Apple this and that Samsung is now doing th same.
Apple didn't rush anything, Apple pay is exactly what they wanted it to be and it's more than what samsung mobile payments can do. Apple pay isn't just about mobile payments, it's about in app and website payments too.
It's one step. Unless taking the phone out of your pocket is a step.
1) hold phone near payment system with thumb on home button.
2) put phone back in your pocket.
side by side comparison carried out by Pocket Now Daily, and even they state it's hard to tell their designs apart!
I don't know for certain as I'm not an Android follower, but I do know that some of my colleagues who use Android devices are just as fanatic about their special features as many Apple lovers are of their devices. Personally I just enjoy tech and if ratio of price to my-enjoyment is favorable enough I'll purchase regardless of the company. E.g. the ratio isn't favorable for Apple Watch at this point in time for me.
Likewise, Apple named things I-this and I-that because that's what everyone else was doing at the time. "Internet" and "Interactive" were hot back then.
And at least Samsung came up with a name unused by anyone else, ridiculously derivative as it might be. (After all, what are the choices? Pay? Wallet? Softcard?)
Apple has at times simply taken trademarked names that others are already using (e.g. iPhone, iPod, App Store) and then bullied/paid their way into ownership. Not to mention trying to trademark "Multi-Touch" as their own, even though it was a well known term.
So in comparison and in the overall scheme of things, "Samsung Pay" is not so bad. Although, man! it's unimaginative, for sure.
Apple Pay does not work on websites. You're thinking of Google Wallet.
And if they cnt they copy from others that could.This is what it comes down to in the end. Apple always finds a way to reduce everything to 1 step.
So? I was always talking about revenueThat's $18 billion in revenue, not profits. I don't see the online ad revenue increasing to $40 billion any time soon.
Google's profits are already plateauing, there is not much more space for ads. They still can't figure out a 2nd major profit engine.
read "cameras with f/1.9 lenses for improved low-light photos"
Take THAT Apple.
but i'm sure like to know how the hell will Apple beat this now.. while Apple still like to say "iphone 6 has the best camera."
They may want to re-think that now.
Then you must be almost blind?
Likewise, Apple named things I-this and I-that because that's what everyone else was doing at the time. "Internet" and "Interactive" were hot back then.
And at least Samsung came up with a name unused by anyone else, ridiculously derivative as it might be. (After all, what are the choices? Pay? Wallet? Softcard?)
Apple has at times simply taken trademarked names that others are already using (e.g. iPhone, iPod, App Store) and then bullied/paid their way into ownership. Not to mention trying to trademark "Multi-Touch" as their own, even though it was a well known term.
So in comparison and in the overall scheme of things, "Samsung Pay" is not so bad. Although, man! it's unimaginative, for sure.
Apple Pay does not work on websites. You're thinking of Google Wallet.
My argument is that the iPhone 6+ is a blatant copy of Samsung's Galaxy Note line.
So far, that argument has not been sufficienty disproven as it is a product that is a direct response to Samsung's Galaxy Note.
Game. Set. Match.
Apple Pay (and Google Wallet) currently work in far less stores in the US than LoopPay (aka Samsung Pay).
View attachment 532330
Interestingly, Mastercard teamed up with Samsung Pay to enable tokenized transactions even from the magnetic side of things.
You go ahead and do that then. Please.
![]()
Honest question, does fast charging degrade the battery over time? If not then I definitely hope we see that with the next iPhone.
The main distinction between Apple and Samsung (and other top Android makers) these days is the OS/ecosystem. The hardware is all very capable and rather similar, regardless of who copied whom on a particular feature. I'd certainly take a Galaxy S(whatever) running iOS over an iphone(whatever) running Android.
This is a nice incremental update to the hardware, but it's nothing that would make an iOS devotee want to jump ship, and probably nothing that would make a previous generation galaxy owner terribly jealous. (and yes, the same can be said of most apple hardware updates)
Maybe by putting a better sensor in the iPhone 6S?![]()