perhaps read this then **** http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/18/the-engadget-interview-dr-charlie-miller/
clearly your to young to remember the same old arguments we used to have back when apple used their own cpu's! it was the same old stuff of apple makes better cpu's just like apple makes better phones, apple dont get viruses ect ect funny that because apple switched to intel cpu's even though they were inferior then suddenly all the isheep shut up about theit cpu's being the better cpu's and after the isheep were proven wrong about macs being safer than pc's for viruses they all shut up but some of these myths still pop up from time to time. its always gonna be the same way for the isheep and it will never change.
Trust me I am not too young. Perhaps you were referring to those years my apologies. I wasn't an apple user until 2007
So I appreciate the too young comment, but unfortunately that doesnt apply.
However apple didn't design most of their desktop CPUs.
First they used motorolas. Then they used IBM. Then they used Motorola again. Then they used Intel. Actually, did they even design any of their own processors for the desktop/laptop? Even the A series are based on the ARM. So that argument is crap either way.
So theoretical security versus how many incidents have windows had over the years?
I will say though that vista and windows 7 is leaps and bounds over xp and the previous. However, any OS is only as secure as the user running it.
Anyway this is getting off topic.
My main point originally was how sad it is that people have to personally attack people to try to make their point.