Nope. iPhone 4S has nothing on SGSII there. In fact, when PC World tested the two phones they gave higher marks to SGSII. But both phones were close in these tests. Some reviewers may rand iPhone 4S higher but again not by much which means that the two cameras are equally good or bad depending on what the standard is). Some reviewers also falsely claim that SGSII does not have image stabilization. It does. In fact, every other flagship (for the given manufacturer) smartphone on the market has image stabilization. Nobody trumpets it though because digital stabilization is mostly a gimmick. Apple made a big fuss about it during their presentation probably because the phone did not have much on iPhone 4 otherwise.
Really? Then the image stabilization on my S2 must be broken then. Because it sucks compared to the 4s. What by the way also sucks is its battery life, the way over saturated screen and the lousy sound quality. The Loudspeaker is mediocore and when you plug in a high quality headphone, you get a mushy wah wah sound. For somebody who likes to use the phone as a iPod, the iPhone is miles ahead. No, really, the S2 is not a bad phone and the big screen makes it nice for people with larger hands, but it is certainly not the holy grail of mobile products.
I really have to laugh about this thread. The typical Apple Haters march up. Samsung sells more Smartphones (23 different models..) than Apple - conclusion: Apple loses and btw nobody prevents Apple from building a cheap Smartphone.
Next quarter: Apple will have the throne back with 4s sales. Then the same suspects will argue that Apple sells less devices compared to Android, therefore technically Apply lost again
Last edited: