without samsung huawei or other of many already started 4" 5" and so on...only Apple under Steve was stuck for 3.5"Gotta start somewhere. Without Samsung, we would still have 3.5” iPhones and 4gb storage for $1999
iPadOS is the result of no competition. Saw the same with intel before Ryzen
So….you’re asking a question to something that you don’t know the answer to and then yet you’re answering your own question by telling Samsung to ‘fix it’? Which basically means you don’t know what you’re talking about then reference Samsungs foldables.Erm…..aren’t the current foldable devices a POS? Fix that first Samsung 🙄
what? the one you can fold or the one you can ? what do you mean?I wonder which Samsung device will excite people more. The one you can fold or the one you can
Whoops. Not sure what happened to the last word. Haha, I meant to say, the one “you can fold or the one you can roll”.what? the one you can fold or the one you can ? what do you mean?
Indeed. This is what I called the REAL courage.You have to admire Samsung’s courage releasing innovation like this.
First gens were pretty meh.Erm…..aren’t the current foldable devices a POS? Fix that first Samsung 🙄 and they make fun of Apple for making dumb decisions
I get that you, repeatedly, wouldn’t call it innovation, but the dictionary does.without samsung huawei or other of many already started 4" 5" and so on...only Apple under Steve was stuck for 3.5"
Making a bigger display i wouldnt call innovation...the quality of the display its a different thing
Intel was because of the silicon brain Johny Srouji, now is at Apple for a decade and we see how its going
Again, this is a main device nowadays, people everyday use this , its something that you can count on...you cannot say "gotta start somewhere...is like when car industry innovated airbags but they weren't reliable at all and people got hurt...again, for prototype "gotta start somewhere" is ok, but when you charge a price, the consumers must rely on their devices daily
There was an e-reader (Readius) with a rollable display around 2008/2009, but they ended up going bankrupt. LG has recently released the OLED TV R. I just wonder how much farther along things could be if there was not a decade of seeming inertia that needed to be overcome.
Exactly this is what I’m looking forward to best of both worlds: small and large screens in a pocketable phone size.This rollable concept seems to have more commercial legs than the foldable phones, which are thick, heavy and besides the Z Flip and the Motorola Startac look like a solution searching for a problem.
And half the battery life of a foldable....This would be awesome. A device that can be the size of the phone but go to the size of an iPad Mini without a fold or double thickness would be amazing. It wouldn't be enough to make me ditch ios, but if the tech is there that be awesome for the future.
Creating a new one with battery....This could fix some of the problems foldable phones have (crease)
Like Apple new and amazing Keyboard, those were tested by users too and then Apple reverted to the old way of making things WORK.And props to early adopters for being even braver to test this kind of exciting prototype from the future.
This could fix some of the problems foldable phones have (crease)
Although if it's anything like the Oppo concept, I can easily see debris getting stuck inside, leading to problems.
Competition takes two or more. You could make the same argument that without Apple, Samsung would still be making flip phones or blackberry type "smart phones" on a trash OS.Gotta start somewhere. Without Samsung, we would still have 3.5” iPhones and 4gb storage for $1999
iPadOS is the result of no competition. Saw the same with intel before Ryzen
I had no clue that foldable phones survived that horrific galaxy fold launch in 2019The existing Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Galaxy Z Fold 3 have been relatively successful additions to Samsung's smartphone family, and the company reportedly plans to ship over 10 million foldables in 2022 with successor models to the Flip 3 and Fold 3