I literally could care less how far behind or advanced we are compared to Samsung ... bottom line their user experience is horrible compared to iphone / iOS. At least in my opinion when i have switched here and there thru the years.
Android is a disaster. End of discussion.I literally could care less how far behind or advanced we are compared to Samsung ... bottom line their user experience is horrible compared to iphone / iOS. At least in my opinion when i have switched here and there thru the years.
This cracked me up....'Chip' on their shoulder...how are they getting on with their chips as a matter of interestJust more proof apple is playing their own game and Samsung still has a chip on its shoulder.
They did reference Google by name. There are a lot of Android manufacturers so I'd reckon they'd just refer to them as "competitors" to save time during their presentations. Even then, if Apple shouldn't even need to reference "competitors" at all if they're so sure of themselves.But Apple don't specify a specific brand within their marketing campaigns as far as I remember. They simply refer to them as competitors and they very rarely do that anymore. Samsung tend to target Apple all the time and constantly use the Apple name in the headline which is embarrassing to say the least.
It's like Apple release a product and the very next day, the Samsung marketing team get together and say....right what can we say about the release yesterday and make sure we use Apple in each of our ads.
The best comeback is exactly what Apple will do, silence. You don’t punch down and Samsung is solidly below them.Apple should respond with “The jerk store called, and they’re running out of you!” That would be the ultimate comeback.
When did they reference Google...I must have missed that.They did reference Google by name. There are a lot of Android manufacturers so I'd reckon they'd just refer to them as "competitors" to save time during their presentations. Even then, if Apple shouldn't even need to reference "competitors" at all if they're so sure of themselves.
Damn well said. That really does sum it all up nicely.Android is a disaster. End of discussion.
“Hi, I’m a Mac.”Why do Samsung always feel the need to attack Apple? It's a bad look IMO. When was the last time Apple attacked any of their competitors?
They’ve got nothing else. Next year they’ll probably say they have 200 MP and it’ll still be worse quality.Doesn’t matter if you got 108 MP, picture quality is not twice as good as Apple.
Notice how it's "I'm a PC" rather than I'm a Dell, Samsung, or HP. That's the difference.“Hi, I’m a Mac.”
“And I’m a PC!”
(To your point, that was forever ago and a much different era for Apple)
Check out this sample photo, full resolution:![]()
ISOCELL HM3 | Mobile Image Sensor | Samsung Semiconductor Global
ISOCELL HM3 provides bright and clear pictures in any condition with Smart-ISO Pro and Nonapixel, supporting 12-bit color depth to express redefined colors.semiconductor.samsung.com
Seems legit…
When Apple mocked Microsoft/Windows it was on point, these just seem like hey we pay attention to everything Apple, lets post their specs in our ads/trolling...free advertising without Apple doing much work.
I'm not sure what you mean by "behind." I'll assume its Global Profits? They don't need to be number 1 to be successful. Samsung is by far the most profitable Android Phone manufacture. Not everything has to be some zero sum game. I prefer iPhones, but Samsung has done quite a great job marketing to the "Something other than Apple" crowd. I can acknowledge that and still love my iPhone.Well considering how far behind Samsung is compared to Apple, I don’t see how it works.
It is self explanatory.I'm not sure what you mean by "behind.
The people who understand this, and would research it are a very small % of smartphone buyers. Perhaps 0.01% It helps persuade the non-iOS people that Samsung is the vendor to stay with. Even though it's making fun of apple.Check out this sample photo, full resolution:
It's like 75 percent smear.
25 percent detail.
The 108mp claims are obviously marketing b.s.
And this sample photo is at ISO 50, mind you. It'll only get worse as you go higher.
For comparison, here's downloadable legitimate 100mp images from the new Hasselblad:
X System Sample Images
www.hasselblad.com
On the Hasselblad, you have real detail. Not smear. _DETAIL_. Legitimate, honest-to-your-favorite-deity detail.
Megapixels aren’t everything. And the fact Samsung highlighted them, shows they’ve got nothing else.Never said I needed more resolution from my phone camera. I am happy to have a much faster processor though and better battery life.
I was trying to understand your perspective, nothing more. Sorry for troubling you.It is self explanatory.
May have sold more this morning.yet Apple will sell more iPhone 14 handsets in the first quarter of sales than Samsung sells S22 handsets in a year.