So what’s the point lol. You might as well just get Tile.Samsung is not using the more advanced Ultra Wideband technology that allows for more precise positioning information to be relayed, instead relying solely on Bluetooth.
So what’s the point lol. You might as well just get Tile.Samsung is not using the more advanced Ultra Wideband technology that allows for more precise positioning information to be relayed, instead relying solely on Bluetooth.
Tile had a comment prepared but they lost the official statement because it was not secured with a working Tile. An official comment will be presented once Tile finds the response and secures it with a fresh Tile and battery.No comments/complaints from Tile about this?
And yet Samsung beats Apple's version of Tile to market. Looks like Tim's late to the copying party.whenever someone says "Samsung doesn't copy Apple", just point them to this and a bunch of other examples in the past.
Samsung copies Apple. Plain and simple.
Everyone copies everyone! There are a tonne of features that Apple directly copied from its competitors, and likewise for Samsung. Convergence of ideas helps move the tech industry forward.whenever someone says "Samsung doesn't copy Apple", just point them to this and a bunch of other examples in the past.
Samsung copies Apple. Plain and simple.
I was thinking the same thing, but it’s not that surprising considering the fragmentation of Android OS and hardware.That could definitely impact sales, in my opinion.
A full touch screen phone.Which released Apple product have Samsung copied here? For all we know, Samsung may have started developing these long before Apple, but the bottom line is they beat Apple to market with them.
Better yet, this could simply be a $$$ play; release the BT 5 version that costs less than the UWB version they can sale for more $$$.Sounds to me that these tags, in the hopes of beating Apple to the market, are a rushed product
Look at the shadow under that suitcase. Goodness that is bad. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a more badly-edited stock photo.
Good lord. You are accusing Samsung of copying an Apple product that hasn't been released and for all we know might not actually exist.whenever someone says "Samsung doesn't copy Apple", just point them to this and a bunch of other examples in the past.
Samsung copies Apple. Plain and simple.
Bluetooth 5.1 has the ability to give more accurate distance info (and I think also direction from phone to tag?) that would be good to have when loosing things in the proximity.So what’s the point lol. You might as well just get Tile.
Perhap it's the other way round? Apple just leak info in a desperate effort to appear to be doing something or occasionally announce things that aren't ready [Airpower]. Tim has to be excited about something in the future; he says so at every keynote.Sounds to me that these tags, in the hopes of beating Apple to the market, are a rushed product
I'd die pretty happy if I never heard the word squircle again...
What happened to that big Apple „surprise“ that was supposed to be revealed on the morning show the other day by the way?
did you hear, no charging brick in their phones? pathetic (not really, but that is what some people said when Apple did it, so back at ya folks!)Not entirely well though. Lack of UWB and using CR2032 make it far less compelling. It remains to be seen whether AirTags will be rechargeable, but it will mostly certainly have UWB.