Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
65,065
33,284


Samsung in February unveiled the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra, a high-end tablet that's meant to outshine the iPad Pro with its 14.6-inch OLED display. In our latest YouTube video, we went hands-on with Samsung's Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra to see if the company has indeed created something that's better than the 12.9-inch iPad Pro.


Priced starting at $899.99 for 128GB of storage and 8GB RAM, the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra is more affordable than the $1,099 128GB 12.9-inch iPad Pro, even though it's bigger with its 14.6-inch AMOLED display. Apple's iPad Pro uses mini-LED technology, and both have the same 120Hz maximum refresh rate.

samsung-s8-ultra-2.jpg

Samsung designed the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra with slim bezels, but it's worth noting that there is a notch for the front-facing camera, even though Samsung has previously made fun of Apple for including a notch on some of its devices. Apple's iPads don't have a notch at this time, so Samsung is breaking ground on the tablet notch front.

Despite the notch, the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra's display is its best selling point, and the OLED panel has an edge over the iPad Pro's mini-LED panel because of blooming, or light leakage that can cause some on-screen elements to have an unwanted glow effect when viewing high contrast content.

samsung-s8-ultra-4.jpg

Samsung put the front camera on the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra in a landscape orientation, which makes sense on a tablet this size as it's more of a desktop-like experience. The iPad Pro has the cameras positioned for use in portrait orientation, which is awkward on a larger display.

samsung-s8-ultra-5.jpg

There is a built-in facial recognition system, but Android device makers have not mastered technology equivalent to Face ID, so it's limited in scope and can't be used for purchases or password authentication. Instead, there is a fingerprint reader built into the power button, similar to Apple's iPad Air.

samsung-tablet.jpg

The iPad Pro has the Apple Pencil as an input device, and the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra has the S-Pen, which is actually included in the box with the tablet so it doesn't require an extra purchase. The S-Pen is more feature rich than the Apple Pencil with air commands in addition to standard stylus support. Both the Apple Pencil and the S-Pen perform similarly, with minimal lag and the same palm rejection capabilities.

samsung-s8-ultra-7.jpg

You can get a keyboard with a trackpad for the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra for an extra $350. The keys are fine, but the trackpad is way behind Apple's Magic Keyboard in terms of usability. Battery life is similar, but Samsung offers 45W fast charging so it can charge up quicker.

samsung-s8-ultra-9.jpg

When it comes to hardware, the Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra and 12.9-inch iPad Pro are similar and are both excellent tablets, but software is what sets the two apart. The iPadOS operating system could offer a better desktop experience, but it still outshines Samsung's Android-based tablet software. Apps don't always work properly, the scale is off, and there are several other issues.

Samsung did develop DeX for a better desktop multitasking experience, and it's similar to something like Chrome OS with a dedicated dock, but it's still not a full computer replacement, much like the iPad Pro. As for performance, the M1 chip is significantly faster, and there's no real competition.

samsung-s8-ultra-10.jpg

All in all, the iPad Pro wins out because of the software experience and the M1 chip's performance, but ecosystem is an important factor. No dedicated Samsung user is going to want to pick up an iPad, and the same goes for Apple device users who are locked into Apple's ecosystem.

Have you tried out the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra? Let us know in the comments.

Article Link: Samsung's Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra vs. Apple's iPad Pro
 
  • Wow
Reactions: sorgo †

Macalway

macrumors 601
Aug 7, 2013
4,048
2,663
I have the Ultra, and my 12.9 M1 is much better, in a number of ways. But like the article says, it's eco.

Samsung stuff is excellent. Google stuff? well.....

Oh, and the new Galaxy tabs are dim. I mean REALLY dim, even without the comparison. The OLED makes up for this, to a point. It's kind of a joke. Clearly, they are afraid of burn-in. Now some folks don't care, but this is a tough crowd here.
 
Last edited:

mach

macrumors regular
Jun 5, 2007
160
122
16:9 is super awkward for a tablet, Glad apple stuck to 4:3.

But the landscape camera is nice, I do wish Apple had a second camera in the Landscape orientation, with the Magic Keyboard I use my iPad 12.9” in landscape 90% of the time but even with CenterStage the camera being low and off to the side isn't great for video calls. Could just be a camera and FaceID stays in the portrait orientation since it works both ways.
 
Last edited:

Macalway

macrumors 601
Aug 7, 2013
4,048
2,663
Doesn't run iPadOS, so it's pretty much gimped out of the box. If it had a Windows 11 option, then might be worth it.

And didn't Samsung rip into Apple about notches on a smartphone... and they have one on a tablet?

Yes, just go with the Galaxy Book 360, which is a much better experience. The resolution is just HD, but at that size it's not an issue. I have one of these also and they are very nice. I will sell the Ultra, as what's the point?
 

Marshall73

macrumors 68030
Apr 20, 2015
2,699
2,824
I use my M1 Pro in portrait most of the time as it’s perfect for browsing and reading. I only use it in landscape when I need to use the magic keyboard. I was even watching the video in portrait mode. Imagine using the Samsung in portrait? Would look dumb and who’s going to drop 1k on a tablet that’s compromised in portrait mode. If you don’t want an iPad but want a tablet then you would be better buying a surface or similar rather than a tablet that’s only usable in landscape and has a rubbish android tablet os.
 

Heat_Fan89

macrumors 68030
Feb 23, 2016
2,784
3,620
I have last years model the S7+ 256GB and 8GB of memory which I got during the Samsung BF Event. I scored one along with a free pair of Galaxy Buds 2 for $379. As a tablet it's nice and very smooth, it is also a nice looking piece of slab. I prefer the iPad's but for the price, I couldn't pass that up. The screen on the Super AMOLED screens are incredible so is the audio. It's the loudest tablet I have ever owned with good bass.

People including MR needs to stop comparing the two. They are separate platforms with different hardware powering them. The S7/S8 are 16:10 screens but I much prefer Apple's aspect ratio.
 

DEMinSoCAL

macrumors 601
Sep 27, 2005
4,981
7,111
16:9 is super awkward for a tablet, Glad apple stuck to 4:3.

Would probably be costly but I do wish Apple had a second camera in the Landscape orientation, with the Magic Keyboard I use my iPad in landscape 90% of the time but even with CenterStage the camera being low and off to the side isn't great for video calls.
Yeah, because literally almost all video media is set at 16:9 (1080p) and not 4:3, so you really get to enjoy those last-century black bars when watching media on an iPad. THAT is super awkward.
 

sherwinzadeh

macrumors 6502
Jan 3, 2008
290
504
16:9 is super awkward for a tablet, Glad apple stuck to 4:3.

Would probably be costly but I do wish Apple had a second camera in the Landscape orientation, with the Magic Keyboard I use my iPad in landscape 90% of the time but even with CenterStage the camera being low and off to the side isn't great for video calls.
Agreed that 16:9 is too much but I do like the 11" iPad Pro's 10:7 aspect ratio better than 4:3. I feel that tablets do need to feel a little more like a sheet of paper than a computer screen.
 

GeoStructural

macrumors 65816
Oct 8, 2016
1,191
4,083
Colombia
iPad is the better tablet overall. The Galaxy is a better computer replacement. I have had iPads for years now, I own the M1 Pro 12.9" currently and it is frustratingly handicapped on purpose by Apple, I love it for media consumption but cannot seriously justify the many downsides for work.
 
Last edited:

Ludatyk

macrumors 603
May 27, 2012
5,909
5,054
Texas
I use my M1 Pro in portrait most of the time as it’s perfect for browsing and reading. I only use it in landscape when I need to use the magic keyboard. I was even watching the video in portrait mode. Imagine using the Samsung in portrait? Would look dumb and who’s going to drop 1k on a tablet that’s compromised in portrait mode. If you don’t want an iPad but want a tablet then you would be better buying a surface or similar rather than a tablet that’s only usable in landscape and has a rubbish android tablet os.
Well, I do agree with you about portrait mode. The experience might indeed feel compromised in that long 16:9 ratio... however, when it comes to the OS. I don't think it's rubbish at all, tbh.. it's more versatile than the iPad given it can run Samsung Dex and it has external monitor support.
 

Marshall73

macrumors 68030
Apr 20, 2015
2,699
2,824
Well, I do agree with you about portrait mode. The experience might indeed feel compromised in that long 16:9 ratio... however, when it comes to the OS. I don't think it's rubbish at all, tbh.. it's more versatile than the iPad given it can run Samsung Dex and it has external monitor support.
Still not a reason to buy one over a surface or similar, Dex… ?
 

44267547

Cancelled
Jul 12, 2016
37,642
42,493
Too bad it runs android.
This is a really tired argument. Android isn’t a problem anymore. If you have any experience with some of the latest android devices, you’d know that it’s actually pretty fluid and secure. The only gripe that someone might raise, it’s just it doesn’t match the longevity of software updates that Apple does.

But just because it’s ‘Android’, doesn’t make it less any other desirable to the consumer. It really comes down to choice of platform of what somebody prefers.
 

Marshall73

macrumors 68030
Apr 20, 2015
2,699
2,824
This is a really tired argument. Android isn’t a problem anymore. If you have any experience with some of the latest android devices, you’d know that it’s actually pretty fluid and secure. The only gripe that someone might raise, it’s just it doesn’t match the longevity of software updates that Apple does.

But just because it’s ‘Android’, doesn’t make it less any other desirable to the consumer. It really comes down to choice of platform of what somebody prefers.
Secure? https://www.express.co.uk/life-styl...gle-Play-Store-app-steal-money-TeaBot-malware
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.