Sour grapes? They have some rules they have to follow. If a product doesn't qualify them they can't be bought.
Way to go Apple!
Just because you have a bunch of cash does not make you right!
I like the old Apple, they tried to play well with everyone.
Can someone please tell me why EPEAT is so important for San Francisco?
Given that Apple hardware costs 3x as much as the Windows equivalent, I'm more surprised that a tax payer funded agency could even afford to buy Apple products.
... We are disappointed that Apple chose to withdraw from EPEAT, said Melanie Nutter, director of San Franciscos Department of Environment...
Given that its very clear that Apple no longer wish to be in the desktop/laptop market I dont see this as a problem for them. All they care about now is iOS and the AppStore. Everything else is secondary.
As far as Apple is concerned, they are only maintaining OS X to allow for development of iOS apps.
Good luck to the IT staff... they will need it. Switching to a completely different hardware and software platform will be painful.
EPEAT, Carbon credits, same bull poop.
If you want to help the environment, pollute less. Carbon credit are like the modern equivalent of indulgences that were sold by the catholic church. Planting trees is a good thing to curb deforestation but don't think of it as a way of covering your environmental "sins".
EPEAT is just another meaningless certification with arbitrary conditions. What they should really look at is what the actual recyclability of a product is, its lifespan and the presence or lack thereof of harmful materials.
What good does it do if something meets EPEAT but becomes e-waste within a year or two? You can only recycle so much and the rest ends up as e-waste in some third world country.
Actual recyclability and reusability should count for more than ease of recycling.
I would rather see a city buy products that last longer than are easily disposable. As long as Apple has a recycling program in place, I don't see the issue here.
What the world needs is more standards and compliance bodies that limit our behavior and decisions, even in how we design our products.
I might be completely wrong but...
Apple's withdrawal causes government agencies to refuse purchases of Macs with tax dollars.
Which means Apple is forcing the government to spend less, however low amount of taxpayer money goes to Mac purchases.
Doesn't that mean increasing government funds by at least some amount?
(Apple pulling out of EPEAT is still a shame)
Sure, just like 40+ states who avoid Hollywood movies......
Good luck to the IT staff... they will need it. Switching to a completely different hardware and software platform will be painful.
Really? Where can I find this magical $400 all-in-one PC that has all the same features as the iMac?
You design Apple products ?
No one is telling Apple how to design their stuff.
Rose colored glasses are fun.I like the old Apple, they tried to play well with everyone.
No. The computers themselves are less expensive, but here's just a few of the fallouts that will cause their expenses to go up:
1 - Workers will end up wasting time with one or more of the following:
- Learning a new computer system.
- Dealing with Windows (because even once you've learned it, you still have to deal with the fact that it's going to have days when it doesn't feel like working.)
- Filling out the additional paperwork to get a new Mac.
2 - They'll need to buy computers more frequently, because the PCs won't last as long as the Macs. Honestly, I use my Macs for 7+ years. I don't stop using them because I want to stop using them, I stop using them because I decide there are enough new features to warrant getting a new one. (It seems like PC's get replaced within 5 years on account of them becoming unusable. Thus PCs are upgraded by force rather than choice.)
Absolutely correct decision - if San Francisco ships all its unusable equipment to third world countries for recycling, where the EPEAT rules are required to safeguard the health of workers with no decent tools. On the other hand, they could return all unusable Apple equipment to Apple, and they are guaranteed that everything will be recycled properly.
It's fairly obvious there is an attempt to bully Apple into changing their designs by telling them they are going to be painted as anti-environment unless they change up their product lines.
They could return all unusable Apple equipment to Apple, and they are guaranteed that everything will be recycled properly.
You forget one key part. A lot of those extra features go unused and are unneeded by the end user. So those features are extra crap that has to be paid for. It could be argue that it is a waste of money having to buy all that extra crap a cheaper computer to cover just fine.