I am hopeful you too are "still learning" - how to use proper punctuation and grammar.
English is not my primary language. American Sign Language is the only I use. You are free to make fun of my poor english grammar.

I am hopeful you too are "still learning" - how to use proper punctuation and grammar.
So if what all the mini users are saying, that the lack of retina is not a big deal, then none of the current mini users will buy a mini with retina when it comes out.
So if what all the mini users are saying, that the lack of retina is not a big deal, then none of the current mini users will buy a mini with retina when it comes out.
So if what all the mini users are saying, that the lack of retina is not a big deal, then none of the current mini users will buy a mini with retina when it comes out.
The mini is a total fail. Unbelievable. Epic sadness - no retina.
This cannot be said enough. A store is a terrible place to judge any display. The Mini looks okay in the store, ugly at home.
----------
My eyes actually did "burn" while using a Mini (eye strain). Never had that experience on other low rez screens.
Wouldn't it be nifty if there was a place for people who are interested in the iPad product line, to share their experiences and expertise, without ridicule and childish proclamations?
As a newb to both the ipad and to the forum, the chaff sure seems to be outweighing the wheat here. Hopefully that settles out soon.
Agreed -- it is too delicate and light. Mine fell a couple of feet and fifty percent if the screen cracked and one edge was dented and it was in a leather case.
Retina ads no thickness, only cost. Battery life differences are negligible. Price is irrelevant, as Apple knows buyers will pay whatever Apple charges.
Instead of including what we _know_ they will eventually do, which is to build it with retina, they left it out. Apple's nothing if not clever, they know they have people addicted to retina at this point, the mini should have had it period.
Apple's entire purpose for "retina" is twofold, bragging rights and to move people upmarket into more expensive devices, thereby fattening Apple's coffers.
This cannot be said enough. A store is a terrible place to judge any display. The Mini looks okay in the store, ugly at home.
----------
My eyes actually did "burn" while using a Mini (eye strain). Never had that experience on other low rez screens.
66145283
How does this even make sense? Are you saying the retail environment lends a halo effect, or that the lighting at apple stores makes the screens appear better than they are? There is something about these mini threads that is very hard to understand.
It's a known fact that interior lighting in clothing departments is as flattering as possible to enhance your skin tones and other things. This is why your outfit will look a bit different under the florescent lighting of most offices and inertior spaces. The quality of the Apple Store's light is probably as flattering as possible as well.
It is difficult to understand if have no experience comparing displays. Environment makes a huge difference. It's why so many people return products with displays after seeing them in the home.
First of all, I hope Apple doesn't spike people because that would just hurt. Second, people ignore you because you are rude and make comments like one you just did above. What is so wrong as a consumer to demand the best from a company we support? We are paying premium dollars so we seek premium technology. Third, while it is acceptable to you, it doesn't mean it is acceptable to everyone else. The fact that people have to look for a third party web browser to properly use the mini is proof that there is a design flaw here; one that people realize could be solved by a retina. Again, if it works for you then by all means. What I find amusing are people like you who get so worked up that people are complaining about a missing component. You do this because it hurts your feeling to know that you paid a good amount of money for a sub-par (visually) product. Go on and defend your purchase. Us "tweedle dumbs" will put our money aside for now until Apple releases a better product.
By the way, if Apple does release a retina iPad mini, and they will eventually, I expect that you won't ever make that purchase....EVER.
Yes and no. Apple stores have a neutral color schemes which makes bright colorful screens pop.
I've actually be surprised by how good apps and video look on the iPad mini. So many people complaining, it helps to realize that it's really a minority opinion. I actually wanted a second mini, because my wife has started borrowing it, even though she has a 3rd gen iPad.
Oh yes they will, that is what Apple is betting on...
BTW went to the Apple store and compared mini to Retina displays. Of course, all their sample books had nice big fonts so both looked good. But started to pull up various web sites, and all the mini small fonts were horribly smeared and illegible. No way am I going to talk myself into how good the Mini is and buy that. Look at this font web site with a mini and Retina based display and see what I mean.
If the Mini 2 ends up being heavier/hotter than the mini, like the 3 compared to the 2, I ain't getting it. Retina ain't worth it.
As far as displays in Apple Stores---the environment couldn't be worse!!! Fluorescent, bright light is one of the WORST conditions to judge a display. They're guaranteed to look better in most environments than they do in an Apple retail store--that's a fact!
That's a lovely Strawman argument you've put together. But let's try again, shall we?
Retina displays are lovely. No one is denying that as a basic fact. Yet, not everyone places the screen at the top of his or her list of priorities. It doesn't mean that a retina display wouldn't be nice to have.
When battery technology has progressed to the point that a retina iPad, full-size or mini, has a ten hour plus battery life and weighs under a pound of course I would be interested in buying one.
Until that day comes, the current screen is nice enough that waiting is, as you put it, not a big deal.
Oops. I forgot to mention the price as well.
Going to be real interesting reading posts when a mini with retina becomes available. Imagine all the back and forth going on now will be nothing with lots of current posts when that does happen in comparison to what the future may hold.
I agree that bright store lights are the worst to judge a display. But what you don't understand is that a display may look better or worse in the home. You are claiming that displays are guaranteed to look better at home. This is obviously false, and it is the reason many people return displays (monitors, televisions, iPads). Store conditions usually hide faults.
I don't think ANY of those of us that have purchased the current mini would argue against retina display, an A6 variant, a GB of RAM or any other complimentary features---and as well as the mini is selling currently, I also believe the resale value will do well -25/30%---which seems like a small price to pay for a year of use (5 or 10 bucks a month). As with the original iPads that many folks are still happily enjoying...if one chooses, the 'Mini" should be just fine for at least two, maybe three years. Think about it--the 'engine' is the same as the updated '2' and the 3rd gen--The A5. Most developers will continue to 'aim' at the masses to maximize their profits, regardless of the state/version of iOS updates.
The talk now is a trade off between the screen quality of the mini versus its size and weight. I assume the next gen mini will at least weigh more so we will see.
Given the screen of the current mini when viewing in portrait mode while browsing, to me the text is fuzzy. Folks say it depends on one's vision. Well if there's is better, doesn't that just make it all the more fuzzy?
Getting stronger reading glasses would or would not help in your opinion in my case if it is fuzzy to me.
I just googled straw man argument. Never heard of that before. You see, you learn something new everyday.
No need to talk yourself into it...or for that matter TRYING to convince others not to buy---especially by posting a silly example of a site no one will ever visit! How about trying MR...even in Safari, in landscape---perfectly legible. While I do LOVE retina displays--if ultimately I had to choose between my iPad 4 and my mini, it would be a really tough decision.
J
I'm just voicing my opinion of the mini on the Internet, that's all. BTW I viewed various sites including that one in landscape already with both devices. In many sites (not just that one), I personally had eye-strain city with the smaller fonts on the Mini. Much smearing with small text on various pages including PDFs. When reading with larger fonts, both mini and retina were legible. That's just my view of what I saw.
If the mini works for person X, then more power to him / her. Personally my own opinion, I really wish Apple put the Retina in the mini and then I would have put the credit card down on it...
I found this little trick very handy on both my Mini and my iPhone: http://howto.cnet.com/8301-11310_39-57433957-285/change-the-font-size-of-a-web-page-on-ios/
Guess I am not fully grabbing the JavaScript that needs to go into the address box for both the + and the - cause they aren't showing up on the bookmarks bar.
I have to click on the little bookmark icon to get to the bookmark bar menu. Does the bookmark bar actually appear for you in iOS Safari? If not, take a peak in your bookmarks folder to see if the +\- are there. (Sorry if I'm stating the obvious!)
Funny how we didn't see literally hundreds of threads complaining how bad the screen is when the cMBP was released, or the MacBook Air or the ipad 1/2 or the original iphone. That's because they met expectations at the time, this one falls short, period.
No--I promise--I DO understand, as displays (video) and audio is and has been my life, occupation and hobby for the past 24 years. Any chance you could show or link us to these mass returns of displays? I'm not sure there are a significant amount of returns on ANY of the products you mention. As far as displays are concerned--I stand 100% behind my response earlier---EVERY display you buy WILL look better outside of a brightly lit fluorescent environment...presented as fact, as it is a fact. I've been doing in home calibration for RPTVs, front projection rigs, LCD/LED and plasmas for the better part of the last decade...my wife and I with the help of a dozen employees also pay our mortgage doing video and audio production. You may consider me a display 'geek'---but what I'm saying is absolute truth...in any environment you're able to control your lighting, the display will perform better EVERY time in comparison to a 'store' setting
You're obviously one of the millions of non display 'geeks' that the B&M stores are marketing, visually to. Pictures in store are often put in 'torch' mode to overcome the lighting--Vivid, high brightness and 'picture' settings, contrast and saturation controls are ridiculously 'wrong' and definitely NOT what you want in a home or production environment
Typically after calibration of TVs, many folks complain...initially. As their eyes adjust to 6500º, and the lifelike presentation...typically over the course of the week...they, too, can walk into Best Buy and instantly realize (and appreciate) the differences
With Apple products...specifically iOS products, the ONLY adjustment allowed is brightness...and in a well lit store such as Apple's, the reflectivity is ridiculous! It's similar to being in direct sunlight...as many Apple stores with the giant glass panels are filled with natural sunlight
I'm not sure where you're getting your info...as I've yet to meet anyone that exchanged a display post purchase, barring a bad or DOA unit...much less 'many' people returning display devices constantly
J