And Apple killed its FaceTime capability.I miss iOS6.
And Apple killed its FaceTime capability.I miss iOS6.
I miss iOS6.
That sounds like a false dichotomy. It is possible to have both.I agree it could look better. However, I will always take function over form when it comes to things like control center, settings app, etc.
I do find the revisionist history of Forstall quite amusing. People complained about the look of iOS making fun of faux leather and green felt, The Verge even ran a story called It's Always 73 and Sunny in Cupertino basically complaining about how stale iOS had become. Now it's Scott should never have been fired and iOS 1-6 was amazing and everything after sucks blah blah blah.
You’ve basically said nothing and left it at that.No. I know Scott and CEO is not in his blood.
[doublepost=1497553538][/doublepost]
Scott was clashing with many of his peers. That's as far as I'll say on it. He could be caustic all the way back at NeXT. I'll leave it at that.
Guys, Forstall is not to blame with iOS Skeumorphism. Blame Steve Jobs instead. iCal's leather is based on Steve Job's private jet and Game Center is based on Casino that is also pushed by Steve Jobs.Remember Game Center?![]()
What's always bothered me is the way they all took cheap shots at Forstall after he left. That line "We just ran out of green felt." by Craig Federighi at WWDC was really classless which is a shame because Hair Force One is usually better than that.
What's always bothered me is the way they all took cheap shots at Forstall after he left. That line "We just ran out of green felt." by Craig Federighi at WWDC was really classless which is a shame because Hair Force One is usually better than that.
Scott you should have just dropped your ego and said sorry about Apple Maps. Sucks you were so difficult to work with and got fired.
We've missed you and your ego is why we haven't heard any news from you for years. You've become that guy that has already done his best work. Thank you for it but man, you could have done so much more. I hate egos sometimes.
I respectfully disagree. As VP of iOS, Scott WAS responsible for the Maps failure, and he should have owned up to it, rather than leaving the CEO 'holding the bag', which is never a good idea. It's also never a mistake to admit to having fallen short and pledging to do better in the future. Stubbornness never got anyone anywhere fast.I respect Forstall for not giving in and apologizing for something which wasn't his fault (data). He could have taken the "easy" route and apologized just to kept his job. IMHO Cook was behaving like a goon and a bully. Steve Jobs would have never apologized or pandered to 'haters'. Kudos Forstall, we miss your work.
You REALLY think he would take shots at a recently deceased beloved CEO or the almost universally despised head of iOS software? Come on man.If you're taking that joke seriously then Federighi was cheapshotting Steve Jobs that time. Because Steve Jobs pushed Game Center to be more like Casino.
iOS "stoner" editionSkeumorphism is Steve Job's vision, and to be honest needs more respect than it usually gets.
Some people here seems trigger happy to blame Scott Fortstall for skeumorphism, but it seems they forget none of this would have happened without Steve's approval.
[doublepost=1497583428][/doublepost]Someone please explain to me how this is any better than Skeumorphic textures:
![]()
I really hope that the next iPhone will blow away us, but based on the recent leaks I don't think so.Gotcha. Those are some fair concerns. But I think when September rolls around, we won't be wondering what Jony and his team have been doing. The next iPhone, all signs point to it being a "wow" product. There's no question that the first half of iPhones life contained more "wows." But that's because there were more problems to solve. The 2nd half of iPhones life has seen it mature, which should be expected after a decade. But let's be real, Apple is still the primary influencer in the phone industry, and Jonys work is still influencing others. They are still setting the design trends. The current design trend of reducing bezels, arguably came about from competitors trying to beat Apple to the punch, who has been rumored to create a bezel-less iPhone for almost 2 years now.
Let's try to put things in perspective. There is no doubt that Steve had tremendous influence over EVERYONES work at Apple. Jony, Scott, Tim, Phil, etc. I doubt any of them would try to argue that. Apples products, advertising, software, are all lacking the special touch Steve had. There's no changing that. Unfortunately the man was taken from us in the prime of his life. I don't think we can single out Jony as being the lone lost soul without Steve. All of them who worked closely with him miss him probably every day.
As for Apple Park, Steve laid a vision and helped iterate an architectural plan. Jony apparently was involved in that process too while Steve was alive, and there's no reason to doubt that. The two were inseparable. But you're kidding yourself if you think the job was done after that. There are SO MANY things involved with taking a plan and turning it into reality. Constraints come rearing their ugly head, requiring further iteration. New ideas come about while executing, require more iteration. I wouldn't doubt for a second if the interior and really smaller details of the campus are way different today than they were originally planned 5 years ago. Jony has been involved with taking a general plan and actually bringing it to fruition. If you look even at just the crude drawings Steve showcased to Cupertino city council, compared to how the campus ACTUALLY looks now, you'll see many changes.
iOS "stoner" edition
[doublepost=1497599792][/doublepost]
I really hope that the next iPhone will blow away us, but based on the recent leaks I don't think so.
I'm not sure if Jony has that kind of expertise regarding the Apple Park. I'm sure that he should change his priorities though.
I don't know. Maybe it's just me but Apple is not that exciting as it used to be. I didn't question their choices that much in the past, but since Jony is messing up with the UI it's a never ending wtf for me. I remember when they introduced iOS 7 that the vast majority of people didn't like it. Even big media like The Verge, etc. were not happy with it. But people used to it in the end I guess. Now we can see that they're bringing back some old elements in iOS 11 and the only reason that's happening is that they basically admitting that the original elements were better. At least that's my impression of it of course.
But to end on the possitive note I have to say, that I'm feeling more excited about the future than ever. The little things like iOS 6 signal bars made me so happy when I installed iOS 11 beta.
2017 and Siri hasn't become markedly more intelligent after five years, with billions spent on research and development, what on earth has Apple got for their R and D investment? Siri on Apple TV is mixed, Siri on mac is complete rubbish, and across platforms there isn't consistency between Siri commands. It's a big disappointment.Go read the press release again. It's very clear why Forstall was let go. Of course no CEO is going to spell out why an executive was let go in a press release. That's why you have to read between the lines. This was the press release header: Apple Announces Changes to Increase Collaboration Across Hardware, Software & Services. Clearly Forstall was a roadblock to increasing collaboration among the executive staff and their teams.
Could you share with us Forstall's vision for the future of iOS, iPhone and iPad? You mentioned Siri. What evidence is there that Siri would be better if Forstall was still here? The big Siri improvement at 2012 WWDC was being able to give sports scores. Wow. Major innovation there. You say Gruber is an Apple apologist but you sound like a Forstall apologist.
I'm sure there are some software engineers and designers (many probably still at Apple) who would quibble with this. No Apple executive is single handedly responsible for anything.
Ive presented on stage ONCE at a small Mac event at Apple Town Hall. He is not a regular on stage presenter. Doing voiceovers for product videos is nothing like presenting on stage in front of a large crowd.
[doublepost=1497554751][/doublepost]
Is that you Scott?
The culture at Apple is full of bullying. There are many engineers and designers who have left because of that. People stay where they feel happy, they leave when they don't. Hopefully a new campus means better workplace relations.I disagree on two fronts:
1. "The Data" didn't make him go to market with an incomplete product. He should have said it's NOT ready and been done with it.
2. Tim Cook isn't known for behaving like a bully or goon, but Scott Forstall, by many MANY accounts is. Therefore, if you want him to be in charge of things, be prepared to lose a lot of other good people, and I'd be thrilled to see what he can accomplish without any support staff. I'm sure we'd have very fine skeuomorphic overlays on our desktops.
[doublepost=1497559522][/doublepost]
If EVERYONE had an issue with the way Forestall treated the people around him, then perhaps, just maybe, the problem was HIM and not everyone else, and certainly not "the culture" for finally having had enough.
Forgive me, but it sounds like you have insider knowledge? Would be good if you could expand on your accounts.No. I know Scott and CEO is not in his blood.
[doublepost=1497553538][/doublepost]
Scott was clashing with many of his peers. That's as far as I'll say on it. He could be caustic all the way back at NeXT. I'll leave it at that.
I like your perspective on this. In a way, this is effectively frosted glass or tie dye psychedelic skeumorphism. Why not just a plain dull light grey sheet instead? Too cold? Too boring? I think decoration to some point seems necessary to make technology seem more human. iOS 10 and 11 seem to be moving closer toward skeumorphic tendencies again.Skeumorphism is Steve Job's vision, and to be honest needs more respect than it usually gets.
Some people here seems trigger happy to blame Scott Fortstall for skeumorphism, but it seems they forget none of this would have happened without Steve's approval.
[doublepost=1497583428][/doublepost]Someone please explain to me how this is any better than Skeumorphic textures:
![]()
I admit that I was happy when Scott Forstall left the company - I thought he was the one pushing the skeuomorphism design - and I prefer the modern UI look. But damn was his iOS releases stable. He was also a good speaker and you could see he was enthusiastic about his work. So I regret him leaving the company now... he was a great asset for Apple.
Scott if you're reading this, please come back!
Again Forstall was the one presenting. If maps wasn't ready for prime time why did he present it? Did Cook say you're fired if you don't present this on stage? Also this was 2012. There is no way Steve Jobs wasn't involved in some of the decision around scrapping Google maps in place of Apple's own solution. This didn't just happen after October 2011. To place all the blame on Tim Cook is wrong.Right but Cook is the CEO which means the ultimate decision on what to present rests with rests with him. Cook wanted a Maps app and knew that it was faulty and rushed it onto the stage at WWDC. And let's be real here, Forstall didn't go to places that weren't already well mapped out. He went to places in San Francisco and so on. I'd EXPECT the mapping data to be flawless in San Fran.
honestly there's not that much different in iOS from a navigation standpoint. Features have been added but it basically works as it always did.Of course iOS 1-6 do look dated these days.
UI-design is about intuitive and easy usability first and looks second.
iOS 1-6 had one of the most intuitive user interfaces of all times. Keeping design principles and structures but modernizing the look would have been way better than what happened with iOS 7.
2017 and Siri hasn't become markedly more intelligent after five years, with billions spent on research and development, what on earth has Apple got for their R and D investment? Siri on Apple TV is mixed, Siri on mac is complete rubbish, and across platforms there isn't consistency between Siri commands. It's a big disappointment.
Unfortunately Gruber isn't objective, impartial, investigative or critical of Apple as good podcasting and reporting MUST be. Great reporting looks at all angles of Apple, gives the full picture. Gruber reporting lacks depth. There are many questions that could be explored. While at times humorous, it's like drinking lolly water watching the interviews. Where's Mossberg? Mossberg digs down deep into the details, that's quality journalism. Gruber could learn a thing or two to become more professional. But I suspect Apple is very much happy to not to dig down into the details which might be why Gruber is the current flavor of the day.
Rogifan, please work on facts, not reading between lines and making up stories.
Fact is executives publicly denigrated the work of Forstall and team at many keynotes after his departure. Complete bullying culture at Apple. That's clearly apparent.
Fact is Forstall and team brought us simple beautiful multitouch interactions and performance optimizations that completely changed the landscape in 2007 and Apple's entire fortunes. The iOS 7 refresh was welcome, but underneath continues to be Forstall and team's user experience, still here today at 10 and now 11.
I'm certainly not an apologist for Forstall, I'm simply highlighting Forstall and team are a very big part of the reason iPhone was revolutionary. Anyone bashing Forstall is effectively bashing Apple by the way.
You suggested J. Ive never presented. I simply picked you up on the fact that he did present in depth on stage, and presents in depth on video at many keynotes.
Does this mean we will get a new picture of him? It's always the same pic!!!!!!
Sure, and right now there's only a little of either.That sounds like a false dichotomy. It is possible to have both.