The profile also reports that Forstall may also been an indirect cause of the lost iPhone 4 prototype in 2010. Forstall reportedly convinced Jobs to allow dozens of his engineers to carry prototypes of the then unreleased iPhone 4.
The profile also reports that Forstall may also been an indirect cause of the lost iPhone 4 prototype in 2010. Forstall reportedly convinced Jobs to allow dozens of his engineers to carry prototypes of the then unreleased iPhone 4.
Interesting. Forstall appears to be a very nice guy. I'm glad Mac OS X won.
I like him, though for some reason he reminds me of Kenny Bania, the Mendy's-obsessed, suit-donating Seinfeld character.
Forstall = Jobs Jr.?
Only time will tell, but so far I've been impressed with Scott's work.
Newsflash- this is what it takes to get **** done and strive for excellence. I love how people naively think that Apple could have become what it is today, and can stay that way, with chilled-out push-overs and mellow dudes leading it. You can criticize what you see as personality flaws from the comforts of your position on a messageboards, as everyone did with SJ, but at least have the common sense to realize this is what is required to make it, especially in an industry as cut throat as this one. SJ got Apple to where it is precisely by having insanely high standards, exacting requirements, and contro-freak (I hate that term) who micro-manages even the tiniest details. And yes, that naturally produces someone who is difficult to work with. But it's a sacrifice that produces results. I know, as I've worked in high pressure environments. I truly hope Forstall IS like Jobs, as are others in the company, cause that's what Apple needs. People who fight tooth and nail for their vision if they believe it's the right one. That's what Steve did- he did it everyday.
Forstall made absolutely the right call. And out of all the public figures at Apple, I like him the best. Seems to be the most Steve-like in his charisma, energy, passion, and onstage presence. Not Steve by a long shot, obviously. I just hope there is a single person at Apple with a vision to lead everyone else by, because decisions by committee will never work. Someone able to play hardball with content providers, as SJ did with iTunes, iPhone, etc. Damn, now I'm getting depressed again.
BULLLSSHHIITT ! If you remember Steve's interview on All Things D, he said himself that Apple needs to test their mobile products beyond labs, under real world conditions. Needless to say you must to do it. Why would anyone need to convince anyone else for that ?!
I like Forstall, he looks creepy though
And that 'douche' is famous, has millions of dollars in his name, and is set for life. Now, please go back to your cubical and finish that exciting Excel sheet you have been working on.
I think Scott comes across very well on the stage for Apple, Phil Schiller as well for that matter. I don't think Apple will have any problems in selling its products if they keep using theses guys. This comes from an Irish perspective where sometimes the americanisms from the americans can be a it cringe. I also used to like the French bloke (what ever his name was). He was witty and I liked the way he said Leopard.
I really like Scott Forstall.
But sometimes when he does a keynote looks like he was just up all night every day working on iOS.
This article makes me really uneasy. Steve was the glue that held everything together. Even if there was infighting between different teams/people and personality conflicts, it seems to be they would always put it aside to please Steve, because of respect/fear/loyalty or what have you. Steve commanded loyalty, and every single anecdote I've read reflects that. They would sweat blood for him, but his approval would make it all worth it- completely irrational, but thats the magic SJ had. He kept everything on track and kept the vision clear. He was the head taste-maker and curator, gave the final nod, as well as being involved in everything else. No other company is structured this way. Apple is. It's sobering to think of potential-fallouts and internal conflict now that the dynamic is changed and the visionary is gone.
And that 'douche' is famous, has millions of dollars in his name, and is set for life. Now, please go back to your cubical and finish that exciting Excel sheet you have been working on.
Scott Forstall reminds me of Richard Hammond. In looks and personality. Anyone else feel the same?
Scott Forstall reminds me of Richard Hammond. In looks and personality. Anyone else feel the same?
I think Scott comes across very well on the stage for Apple, Phil Schiller as well for that matter. I don't think Apple will have any problems in selling its products if they keep using theses guys. This comes from an Irish perspective where sometimes the americanisms from the americans can be a it cringe. I also used to like the French bloke (what ever his name was). He was witty and I liked the way he said Leopard.
Aww, I didn't know that I was going to hurt your sentiments. But guess what? He's still a douche!
No.
----------
I think this guy comes off rehearsed and phony. Phil is probably the smoothest after Steve.
If they had any brains at all, they'd have Jonathan Ive do all the presentations. He's young, good looking, and has a silver tongue. The keynotes without Steve are painful.... they need a better mouthpiece.
Interesting. A shrunken down OS X just seems like an all around better idea. Good call Forstall.
I think it was a no brainer to go with OS X, what's the fuss here all about.
Working at Apple sounds scary. Every time I read about accounts of the inner workings of Apple it reminds of accounts of the inner workings of Scientology. Apple is materially successful, but some of the accountings don't sound mentally healthy.