Makes sense, since the display is smaller and there is less pixels to push. Still the numbers are definitely impressive.
Wow...its on par with the 6S Plus. Very impression job by Apple to not make a (2016) version of the iPhone 5C.
check the prices in Europe. If it's cheap to you ...Who said "cheap" had to suck?I'm amazed more and more at the stories I hear about how capable this phone is... it's going to be a fun day when my preorder comes in!
You realize the SE doesn't even have a 720p display, while the S7 has a 2K display right? It's no wonder the SE gets higher benchmarks in some tests.The SE outscores many android ''flagships'' including Galaxy S7 lol
You realize the SE doesn't even have a 720p display, while the S7 has a 2K display right? It's no wonder the SE gets higher benchmarks in some tests.
For the graphics benchmarks, yesOne could easily say that it has half as much ram and only dual core CPU. Display alone can't explain the difference.
Walt Mossberg on the iPhone SE...
In my tests, the iPhone SE performed like a champ. For one thing, it’s wicked fast. It shouldn’t be any faster than the larger 6s, because its main and graphics processors are the same. But it feels faster to me, flying through scrolls and swipes. This may just be because I haven’t used a 4-inch phone for awhile, or perhaps because the chips are having to move fewer pixels on the smaller screen.
The rear camera is also excellent. It’s been bumped up to the same great 12-megapixel version on the 6s. And the phone has an array of features introduced since the 5s came out in 2013. These include Apple Pay, 4K video recording, faster LTE and Wi-Fi, and new colors, including Apple’s oft-hyped rose gold, which just looks like pink to me.
Battery life in my trials was very, very good. While I didn’t perform a formal test, the new iPhone SE easily lasted a full 12-hour day for me — and still had 20 percent or more left in the tank. And that was after lots of testing, including streaming video and audio and downloading hundreds of messages.
Wicked fast.![]()
check the prices in Europe. If it's cheap to you ...
Has there ever been an iPhone that wasn't wicked fast out of the box? They all are, what matters is how fast it is 6 months down the road when it's loaded up with apps, pictures, and other junk. Even the 3G was "wicked fast" when it came out of the box.
Damn, I would feel really bad if I had the iphone 6. Apple needs to stop selling the 6 immediately.
Uh, yes. The graphics benchmarks are extremely biased towards lower resolution screens. Run a graphics benchmark on the 6s and the 6s+ and you'll see what I mean.
No disrespect to anyone, but labeling the SE as a "budget" iPhone is borderline ignorant.
It's almost on par with the flagship 6S that was launched six months ago. Minus a few specs that most people won't care about.
I think we can all agree that the 5c was Apple's official budget iPhone.
The screen is just way too small to do anything practical.
Speaking of jelly.The screen is just way too small to do anything practical.
If you are moving everything from a previous iPhone, photos are about all that won't be loaded up right after it's out of the box.Has there ever been an iPhone that wasn't wicked fast out of the box? They all are, what matters is how fast it is 6 months down the road when it's loaded up with apps, pictures, and other junk. Even the 3G was "wicked fast" when it came out of the box.
Come on now - if we see an iPhone 3.5" SE model you would see that 3.5" display model destroy the current iPhone SE. This isn't even fair! What's the point of all that jelly with no toast? The screen is just way too small to do anything practical.
lol so I have done nothing practical on my iPhone 5, 4 and 3GS over the last 6 or so years? Right....
I totally agree
I have no idea why they're still selling the 6 and 6+
Too many SKU's right now