Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why? Is the 10 seconds or less it takes to unlock your phone and select the card to use THAT much of a hassle in your life?
You clearly haven’t used Tokyo train systems, the kind of which Express Transit seems to be designed to handle.
If you have 10 seconds why would you bother turning on ET?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mastercheif91
Credit card itself is a risky payment method… a tap on the card can take away your money… or even just copy your number and enter somewhere online. A balance has to be struck between convenience and risk. If you eliminate all risk, there is no convenience left. Apple Pay is already a very good middle ground.
The real card number is never transmitted when using tap. ;)
 
Couldn't they bring up an alert on the lock screen the requires user input to confirm? Perhaps not a full unlock, but pressing a button. Also, why not specify an upper limit on the money spent per day this way to limit losses? VISA will cover fraudulent charges, but fraud does come back to consumers in terms of higher fees and interest rates.
See? This is what all these ridiculous allegations did. Make the perfectly fine system, the good one at that, worse because of FEAR.
 
How much of a risk do you think that is - bearing in mind risk is also based on likelihood, not just impact?

(a) Despite all the scaremongering associated with contactless payment as a whole, nearly 15 years on none of the predicted 'risks' have become a significant issue
(b) The hack highlighted here has been demonstrated in a lab, it hasn't been seen in the real world. That's a massive step
(c) The liability lies with Visa, I'm happy with that and unconcerned by unsubstantiated "yeah but what if's"
(d) Visa seem happy to accept the financial risk, I'm guessing they've done their homework
(e) Try taking that 10 seconds whilst leaving a busy Tube/subway station at rush hour. Multiply that disruption by the amount of other people who'd be doing the same

As I said, no one would ever believe criminal gangs would put card scanners and micro cameras into cash dispensing machines in bank building walls. But they did, repeteadly, so it’s very naive to simply brush this off with a it’ll never happen to me attitude. Likewise with car thieves using scanners and stealing your nice posh car thanks to keyless entry system, or they break the small window in the front door, lean in and use the access port, which by EU law is in the same place in every car, connect the special coding machine which by EU law must be sold on the open market, and simply code your car to open and start and off they go. This is not beyond the reach of criminals these days.

The article also clearly highlights the liability lies with BOTH Apple and Visa.
And you need to sort your life out if you seriously consider 10 seconds in the name of security is a major hassle in your life, you can lift your phone, it auto unlocks, press the button for payments and select your card long before you get to the ticket barrier machine, it quite literally is no hassle at all, you are making it out to be because ‘you’ consider it inconvenient.
 
Credit card itself is a risky payment method… a tap on the card can take away your money… or even just copy your number and enter somewhere online.

No, your actual credit card number is not transmitted. And through the use of cryptography and transaction identifiers, whatever transaction that occurs cannot be replayed - so if money is charged to your card it can only happen once, and not repeated later.

Also, none of your money is taken away. Money is charged against your credit card balance (if the network or the issuer doesn’t catch the fraud), but if you dispute it and it wasn’t a legitimate charge, then you won’t have to pay.
 
It’s not so much apple “passing the blame.” The blame really is with the visa network - there isn’t anything apple can do about and still allow transit pay with visa - the issue is with their protocol. The only solution apple could implement is disabling that feature so you’d have to unlock the device to pay for transit with visa.

Why is it then people on here claim it doesn’t affect Android phones though? It doesn’t seem to mention it in the article so I have no idea if that’s true, but if it is then surely Apple must be involved somehow?

I think an upper limit is the most sensible solution, I mean you cannot go a pice £50 with contact less payment till next month when it raises to £100. And you can only use it so many times before you need to enter a pin with your card.
 
Why is it then people on here claim it doesn’t affect Android phones though? It doesn’t seem to mention it in the article so I have no idea if that’s true, but if it is then surely Apple must be involved somehow?

I don’t know that it’s true, first of all (and by the way, interesting that they used an android phone as part of the hack). I don’t even know if android has something that works the same way as transit pay. But given that even Visa says it’s Visa’s fault, it take a special kind of Apple-hater to blame the issue on Apple.
 
Well the setting is turned off so the majority of people won’t be impacted and from working in the card industry I can see visa's point, it would take some level of sophistication and with all the security at places where you will use this, it’s pretty much useless. Plus the scammers would need a legitimate card reader very hard to process payments with a hacked card reader also as there is a whole world behind them. Payment doesn't just go from card holders bank to card readers bank.

Criminals read bank cards and recorded your pin details with cameras as you used cash dispensing machines…
 
That's because Android Pay/Samung Pay do not seem to support "Express Transit" using a credit card. This feature requires a 'secure terminal' what Apple apparently provides. Problem with Visa seems to be that *any* secure terminal can be bypassed via this man-in-the-middle attack as there is a flaw in the visa protocol.

This publication describes it in full detail https://emvrace.github.io

The real scam here is that the British "researchers" just demonstrated that this Visa flaw can also be demonstrated with an iPhone and a 'virtual' Visa card stored in Apple Pay. They basically stole the research of the Swiss team!
You are incorrect.

With Samsung Pay you can set up a card as a ‘transport card’ to use on TFL services. This option means you don’t even need to wake your phone or verify. Simply touch the middle section of your phone against the card reader.
 
Researchers in the U.K. have demonstrated how large unauthorized contactless payments can be made on locked iPhones by exploiting Apple Pay's Express Transit feature when set up with Visa.
This is a non-issue. The best part of credit cards is the zero liability coverage. Someone can physically steal your card and make purchases, and you would be reimbursed. It only affects Visa and it sounds like they are comfortable covering the losses, if there is any.
 
I hope Apple will eventually start working on the things that they are weakest at -- privacy and security -- rather than actively adding feature that are hostile to these things.

But this is a Visa issue, not an Apple issue.
 
I don’t know that it’s true, first of all (and by the way, interesting that they used an android phone as part of the hack). I don’t even know if android has something that works the same way as transit pay. But given that even Visa says it’s Visa’s fault, it take a special kind of Apple-hater to blame the issue on Apple.
Interestingly the full report here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-58719891 doesn’t state Visa accept its entirely an issue with their systems, they just claim it won’t happen in the real world as it’s impractical so won’t fix it.
Just like no one would thought it practical for thief’s to install card scanners and tiny cameras into cash dispensing machines. Or car thief’s use scanners to grab your keyless key codes.
It will be rare I agree, but so we’re the previous types of theft I mentioned once.

Also of note is Samsung Pay and Master Card were found to be immune to the hack.
 
Interestingly the full report here http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-58719891 doesn’t state Visa accept its entirely an issue with their systems
Visa doesn’t have to state anything. If this fraud happens, a big IF since if you read the article they’re talking about stolen iPhone, it will fall under unauthorised payment and will automatically be protected by Visa's zero liability policy.

A bunch of Little Chicken these researchers if you ask me.
 
As I said, no one would ever believe criminal gangs would put card scanners and micro cameras into cash dispensing machines in bank building walls. But they did, repeteadly, so it’s very naive to simply brush this off with a it’ll never happen to me attitude. Likewise with car thieves using scanners and stealing your nice posh car thanks to keyless entry system, or they break the small window in the front door, lean in and use the access port, which by EU law is in the same place in every car, connect the special coding machine which by EU law must be sold on the open market, and simply code your car to open and start and off they go. This is not beyond the reach of criminals these days.

And yet we still have cash machines and keyless cars, so I'm guessing the overall risk is generally deemed to be acceptable when balanced against everything else?

It's all too easy just to dismiss Visa's statement:

"Visa cards connected to Apple Pay Express Transit are secure, and cardholders should continue to use them with confidence. Variations of contactless fraud schemes have been studied in laboratory settings for more than a decade and have proven to be impractical to execute at scale in the real world."

but surely you need to take that into account when making an informed, balanced judgement?

The article also clearly highlights the liability lies with BOTH Apple and Visa.
And you need to sort your life out if you seriously consider 10 seconds in the name of security is a major hassle in your life, you can lift your phone, it auto unlocks, press the button for payments and select your card long before you get to the ticket barrier machine, it quite literally is no hassle at all, you are making it out to be because ‘you’ consider it inconvenient.

There's really no need for you to make this a personal attack, but my point isn't about personal convenience to me. It's about having a system where you've got two hundred people trying to get through maybe four ticket barriers before the next train comes in two minutes later and you're requiring a large percentage (50%?) of them to have to authenticate themselves on their phones. It might work for one or two people in the same way you always get those whose ticket/card doesn't work, or who wait till they get to the barrier before fumbling in their pocket for their card, but the practicalities just don't scale up to the large numbers of people using phones to pay these days.

But fundamentally, why? This isn't an iPhone/ApplePay-specific vulnerability, it applies to all contactless Visa cards and I'd guess the majority of people will still be carrying those around with them. Indeed if you did mandate unlocking iPhones to use them on mass transit, I suspect many people would just go back to using that vulnerable Visa card instead.

Sure, people can turn Express Payment off if they personally don't feel comfortable with their perception of the risk, but to suggest the function should be removed just seems to be an over-reaction that's not warranted by the risk and would have a significant detrimental effect.
 
But given that even Visa says it’s Visa’s fault, it take a special kind of Apple-hater to blame the issue on Apple.
I don't blame Apple but I expect them to be putting pressure on Visa to fix the issue, or implement something at their end to protect Apple customers. Apple has known about this for nearly a year and the issue is still there - this doesn't exist with Samsung Pay with a transit Visa card so it cannot be all Visa's fault.

Given that transit is for low value fares, I cannot see why the iPhone is allowing an unauthorised payment of £ 1,000 - it should have a cap around £ 15.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pezimak
Where’s the people who was telling everyone they only trust their credit card to Apple and non third parties?

The irony.
You are right about irony....but only if you meant to be incorrect about your entire statement 🤣

This comment is a dedication for those that ridiculed me when I commented about not being comfortable with the security of Apple Pay.

I think they would appreciate you dedicating your comment in the memory of how correct they were! 🤣
 
I do suspect Visa is correct and that this is hard to replicate in the real world; however, I wish Visa (and other such companies) would consider the time wasted by their customers addressing fraud. I think they usually look at their direct costs but not so much the consumers.

It can still take some time for the cardholder to check their account online, call their card issuer, wait on hold, go through and verify the last month’s transactions at times, etc… Some card issuers are better at this and allow verification online, but many still require a phone call. Then there’s the possibility the card may have to be canceled, be unavailable for a while, and have to be mailed out. This is mitigated some by virtual numbers used by the iPhone and other platforms, but some issuers still seem to want to issue a new card despite that.
 
Want Visa to stop their tin-eared blathering about “theoretical but unlikely”?

Just Switch your ExpressTransit Card Setting from Visa to MasterCard, or, if allowed, to AMEX, and you’re all set.
 
You should probably go back and actually read the article, not just the click-bait headlines.

In case you don't have that sort of time, here's the cliff notes:
Express payments are off by default
This issue only affects Visa, not MasterCard or American Express (hint, it's not iPhone's issue)
Apple can't fix Visa's systems for them. It's like asking Apple to patch Microsoft Word to fix an issue.
It's only a proof of concept in a lab
Visa has said they don't see this being an actual problem in the real world

Stop it with your well-reasoned post. Stat! I need something to get outraged about this morning so I can feel good for the rest of the day. And now I have to find something else. :(
 
I have express transit disabled on my Apple Pay (I guess it's off by default luckily). I have used the tap to pay on my Visa card before but, not a lot of places have the option in my experience.
 
Last edited:
This comment is a dedication for those that ridiculed me when I commented about not being comfortable with the security of Apple Pay.
Removing original comment - was not relevant to this comment and my snarky response would be inappropriate.
 
Last edited:
I think Visa is at fault 80% for lack of security (Mastercard isn’t prone to this attack) and Apple is 20% for allowing unauthenticated express transit payments.

Apple ought to restrict unauthenticated payments to transit passes only. The risk of misuse is far lower because the card can only be used at one place.
How can they authenticate this? Many of the transit system tap-and-go systems run over the Visa network. Others run over MasterCards network. Others act more like a POS terminal at the turnstile.. To ApplePay the transit card would look like a Visa / MasterCard / AmEx card. No different than the Visa network running both the debit card and credit card you get from your bank. One has fraud reimbursement and one does not. Be thankful, as a consumer who might someday actually get hit by this, that by reading between the lines of Visa's comment that the transit systems are run as credit cards and node debit cards for the transaction and fraud processes.

EDIT: Clarification of the first point, and adding:

For pure closed loop transit systems that require profiled accounts that do not take direct credit / debit payments at the turnstiles then I would venture that this is a non-issue regardless of the network used as there would be no ability to process a charge transaction outside of the profiled back for the purpose of the transit activity.
 
I haven't read all of the comments but I had a couple dollars stolen from my account through a similar hack that was charged to the NYCT I believe and I live no where near NY and haven't visited NY in many years. If I had to guess they are hiding these near vending machines that accept Apple Pay so when you buy a soda and authenticate they are also reading your card and stealing from your account.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Pezimak
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.