Nermal said:It's not showing up in my SU, could a "hacked" Safari cause this?
The -007 doesn't mean 7th month, just that it's the 7th update this year.
Actually, it denotes the spyware edition
(cue "Secret Agent Man")
Nermal said:It's not showing up in my SU, could a "hacked" Safari cause this?
The -007 doesn't mean 7th month, just that it's the 7th update this year.
Darwin said:I was on a roll with 31 days, but I guess its back to zero now![]()
![]()
SiliconAddict said:*shrugs* I've come to the conclusion that its pure chance. Everyone keeps bitching about Windows when in fact I have 5 windows XP/2000/Server 2003 systems in my home and I NEVER get any problems. Yet just yesterday a friend found that Windows isn't holding reg values anymore and some of the changes he makes to his system doesn't stick on reboot.
I think its all about the user and how they manage their system. *shrugs* Whatever.
My company in one of its former incantations provided a fault tolerant UNIX platform used in the telephony area. The uptime counter was a 32 bit unsigned integer that measured the number of "ticks" (1/100th of a second) since the last reboot. The problem is that the systems were up continuously so long (for years actually) that it caused the uptime counter to roll over. Not a bad reliability problem to have, eh? What a hoot....ham_man said:I had no problem with 10.3.8...
Holy crap. I thought that my 13 day record was something to be proud of...![]()
I haven't had any problem with this update. Glad it fixed a lot of buffer errors...
So, wait. One "tick" equals one millisecond?jcrowe said:My company in one of its former incantations provided a fault tolerant UNIX platform used in the telephony area. The uptime counter was a 32 bit unsigned integer that measured the number of "ticks" (1/100th of a second) since the last reboot. The problem is that the systems were up continuously so long (for years actually) that it caused the uptime counter to roll over. Not a bad reliability problem to have, eh? What a hoot....
artifex said:Your friend may want to check his hard drive for errors...
Applespider said:It literally didn't decimate your Powerbook - you didn't lose every tenth app after all.
Sorry to hear that you had problems for no apparent reason if your apps were all where they should be. Had you been using Tinkertool or any of the other OS X modding apps?
ohcrap said:So, wait. One "tick" equals one millisecond?
Well, the only reason I wait is because.... I'm on a dial-up connection. Oh well. You know what the sad thing is? My grandma has DSL. But then again, she lives in town. To grandmas house!TyWahn said:I find it funny that people think they need to wait and see if anybody's machine explodes, or dies or whatever.. I have never had a single issue with a security update, or OS update for that matter. If you have a reasonably well maintained machine, you should have nothing to worry about. Don't you think?
SiliconAddict said:*shrugs* I've come to the conclusion that its pure chance. Everyone keeps bitching about Windows when in fact I have 5 windows XP/2000/Server 2003 systems in my home and I NEVER get any problems. Yet just yesterday a friend found that Windows isn't holding reg values anymore and some of the changes he makes to his system doesn't stick on reboot.
I think its all about the user and how they manage their system. *shrugs* Whatever.
Ha ha...well said....I installed the update and have not had any issues YET....but lets see....if it is having so many issues the next update should well be on its way!MegaSignal said:Sounds like 2005-008 will be on its way shortly...
pubwvj said:Remember 10.3.8?
Remember 10.2.8?
Remember FireWire800 problems?
Remember...
There have been times when it was good not to be the first to update...
Be afraid. Be very afraid. Paranoia isn't just a way of life, it's a good idea.
Mac_Freak said:It is kind of a nice that Apple test their own OS for holes, rather than waiting for hackers to find them; unlike Microsoft.![]()
galfenol said:I just received a helpful email from the tech support people at Wolfram Research advising me not to install 2005-007 on my G5, because it prevents 64-bit-native apps like Mathematica 5.2 from running. They had a work around script developed which could rescue someone who had already done the deed. The script temporarily disables the 64 bit capability of Mathematica.