'See' Director Used Blind Consultants, an Evolutionary Biologist, and Survivalist When Filming

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
7,734
8,678



"See" director Francis Lawrence, who also directed the "Hunger Games" movies, recently sat down for an interview with Business Insider where he shared some details on the filming of "See" and the research that went into the show.

According to Lawrence, rumors that "See" cost $240 million for two seasons were incorrect. "See" is "an expensive show," said Lawrence, but that budget "got blown out of proportion." It's nowhere near the scale of other big shows like "Game of Thrones."


When filming "See," Lawrence had a "think tank" with blind consultants, an evolutionary biologist, and a survivalist to brainstorm ideas. "See," for those unfamiliar with the show, is set in a post-apocalyptic timeline where most of the world was wiped out by a virus, and those who were left were rendered blind.
How long after civilization had vanished does the story take place and what would things look like and what would remain? We built out a blindness bootcamp with our consultants and [figured out] how that crosses over with our art and props department. What do the huts [in the village] look like? How are people navigating?
The actors in the show are made to look blind using special effects rather than contacts, as Lawrence said that it was impractical to use contacts for so many people due to the risk of cornea issues and the cost of hiring optometrists.

While much of the cast of "See" can see, some of the main tribe are low vision or blind. "See" aimed to find low vision or blind actors, and hopes to improve upon that in the second season.
Primarily the cast can see. Some of our main tribe, like Bree Klauser and Marilee Talkington, in the first couple episodes are both low-vis. Some of the actors in the Queen's court are blind. We tried to find as many blind and low-vis actors as we could. The goal would be to improve upon that in the next season.
Much of the show was filmed out in the wilderness and "pretty far from any cities," which made it difficult. The battle in episode one, for example, took four days to film because it involved a lot of people and a lot of stunts.

"See" has a rather surprising introductory scene introducing Queen Kane, who is the queen of the region, which Lawrence also commented on. When he saw that part of the script, he said, he "loved it."
The blindness idea fed into every [creative] choice we made. To connect spirituality with the senses and euphoria and pleasure in that way was really interesting. I also loved when I watched the episode the feeling of getting to the Queen and discovering a new facet of the world. Two-thirds of the way through the [first] episode, you kind of feel like you know the kind of show you're [watching]. Lou Reed is playing on a record player. It opens up the show tonally.
Lawrence's full interview, which goes into even more detail on filming, can be read over on Business Insider. "See," which stars Jason Momoa and Alfre Woodard, is available on Apple TV+ now.

Article Link: 'See' Director Used Blind Consultants, an Evolutionary Biologist, and Survivalist When Filming
 
Last edited:

Unggoy Murderer

macrumors 6502
Jan 28, 2011
359
98
Edinburgh, Scotland
I've really enjoyed the first few episodes, and looking forward to the next one on Friday. There's a free trial - if you haven't watched it for yourself then give it a try, it'll literally only cost you time.

For All Mankind looks great too, that's next on my list. I'll be continuing with the £4.99 monthly payment, from what I've seen so far it's worth it.
 

benshive

macrumors 6502
Feb 26, 2017
324
2,477
United States
I've really enjoyed the first few episodes, and looking forward to the next one on Friday. There's a free trial - if you haven't watched it for yourself then give it a try, it'll literally only cost you time.

For All Mankind looks great too, that's next on my list. I'll be continuing with the £4.99 monthly payment, from what I've seen so far it's worth it.
I was thinking the same thing. For All Mankind is next on my list to watch. I don't have to pay anything though because I have the student subscription to Apple Music ;)
 

miniyou64

macrumors 6502a
Jul 8, 2008
580
1,934
I can’t even believe Apple is getting into content. They’re a tech company. And they would do much better to focus on that. Steve always talked about how they had such a focused, small number of high quality products. Fix your bugs Apple
 

rmoliv

macrumors 65816
Dec 20, 2017
1,088
1,602
I wonder what kind of consultants those were. It doesn't make sense that in a society that has been blind for centuries people still match colors in their clothes, or use feathers on their heads as ornaments, and so many other details... Worst attempt at science-fiction ever!
 

Unggoy Murderer

macrumors 6502
Jan 28, 2011
359
98
Edinburgh, Scotland
I can’t even believe Apple is getting into content. They’re a tech company. And they would do much better to focus on that. Steve always talked about how they had such a focused, small number of high quality products. Fix your bugs Apple
I can believe, because it's pretty simple: diversifying your product offerings distributes risk, and increases the perceived value of the other products the company offers. No other company on the planet has an ecosystem of products and services like Apple.
 

m0sher

macrumors 6502a
Mar 4, 2018
632
550
I love “See” over all the Apple series shows so far. Concept is cool and it’s out there. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: pizzzle

Theonlyronster

macrumors newbie
Nov 4, 2019
8
59
I can’t even believe Apple is getting into content. They’re a tech company. And they would do much better to focus on that. Steve always talked about how they had such a focused, small number of high quality products. Fix your bugs Apple
You do realise they hired a bunch of people to handle tehe content side of things?

Craig Federighi isn’t spending his weekends doing an edit of For All Mankind.

Please tell me you get this, I’d be terrified to think you’d be this silly.
- - Post merged: - -

I wonder what kind of consultants those were. It doesn't make sense that in a society that has been blind for centuries people still match colors in their clothes, or use feathers on their heads as ornaments, and so many other details... Worst attempt at science-fiction ever!
If all the cloth is sourced from the same place, then multiple garments will be the same colour. And feathers work for textural and aural affectation. Use your imagination, that’s what the show runners did.
- - Post merged: - -

I wonder which one of those suggested that they include a mystic who touches herself while reciting a bastardized version of the Lord's Prayer that has no relevance to the story whatsoever.
How do you know it has no relevance, they’ve not expanded on the history of this world much yet.
 

mcfrazieriv

macrumors 6502a
Jan 30, 2012
737
1,796
Irvine, CA
I bet those people all were out in the woods demonstrating the slapping of whips against the forest floor as a means of getting around.
 

Bug-Creator

macrumors 6502a
May 30, 2011
566
2,164
Germany
I still can’t ‘see’ how we would go back to living in caves though? (Opening scene)
I think thats easy, cos with everybody being blind (instead of 99% turning Zombie like in the Walking Dead) the survivors would loose access to most of what makes a civilization. No modern transport noone who could fix things and only very few could read what has been available in Braille before.

Simple things like hunting or building even the most basic shelter would be a massive problem leaving no time to pass on knowledge to the next generation (which will have a it a little bit easier for being born blind).

I'm not even sure mankind would survive at all except maybe places with very friendly wether, flora and fauna.
 

benshive

macrumors 6502
Feb 26, 2017
324
2,477
United States
I wonder which one of those suggested that they include a mystic who touches herself while reciting a bastardized version of the Lord's Prayer that has no relevance to the story whatsoever.
How does it not have any relevance? She is the one that the people believe communicates with their god (or gods, I forget). In the ignorance that's resulted from generations of blindness they've confused euphoria with spirituality, as is mentioned in one of the quotes in the article. It makes the viewer a bit uncomfortable but I'm assuming it's supposed to.