Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Back in the day we had the Fisher-Price PXL2000, which was a toy video recorder that recorded video to a cassette tape. This gem which came out in 1987, held an ordinary cassette audio tape that would store both video and sound. The PXL-2000 would hold 11 minutes of footage by moving the tape at a high speed, nearly 9X normal cassette playback speed. This was my little brother's toy, but we all shared it in my family.

The PXL would record at roughly 16.875 in/s (429 mm/s), vs. a standard cassette's speed of 1.875 in/s (48 mm/s) on a C90 CrO2 (chromium dioxide) cassette. The higher speed is necessary because video requires a wider bandwidth than standard audio recording. (In magnetic tape recording, the faster the tape speed, the more data can be read/written per second, i.e. higher bandwidth.)

We made lots of movies with this technology, including attack of the giant chickens, and many stop motion movies with Lego blocks. VHS recorders while available at the time were not considered toys at that time, verses now kids often get $1000 iPhones for xmas, and computers. This product was expensive for it’s time ($179 dollars, which in 2017 dollars would be around $383 dollars), in my family that was our whole Christmas budget for a family of 5, but if you saved your birthday money, and spent summers doing chores, and mowing lawns you could save up to buy things.
 
Funny thing is that none of you would know the video was shot with iPhone if you weren't told on this article. Stumbling on each other who can throw the negativity first. Only on MacRumors!

None of us would look into a Selena's videos to start with unless they are being pushed in our face on this site. And this video is bad enough itself already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
Yeah... at this point Apple reminds me of the starting poem from Drakengard 3. It’s like a Flower, seemingly beautiful at first, yet, in every which way (music artists, TV, etc. Areas outside of Apple’s expertise, basically) spreading and driving it’s wicked, dirty roots into the world, looking to consume it until all that is left is the dried, crumbling earth. ... Except it’s not a flower here, but an... Apple tree. 🙃
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexGraphicD
why does it matter that it was made on a phone? There is nothing special about it...
Some movies where made on 100 year old cameras...
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexGraphicD
Cue the comments where MR readers trash Selena (just like they do with any other current pop star) & "modern music sucks/let's listen to Queen or The Beatles aka real music"

Funny that you mention the word 'trash' and her name right next to each other. Because that's what a lot of people associate her music with. 😛

There is even a funny meme about it.

June-23-2014-22-06-33-IMG1514.jpg
 
As always, it's not about the camera. Rather, it's the photographer/videographer, along with their vision, experience and editing skills, that make it happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexGraphicD
I'm not a fan of "pop" music, but this song sucks even for pop. The video quality seems good, but the fading in and out every 3 seconds is annoying.
[automerge]1571843748[/automerge]
Cue the comments where MR readers trash Selena (just like they do with any other current pop star) & "modern music sucks/let's listen to Queen or The Beatles aka real music"

Modern music does not suck, most of it does, just like most of the music from all decades sucks, but the music we still listen to from the 60's, 70's, 80's... is just the music that stood the test of time. I like a lot of new music, just not in the pop music genre. That being said, this song sucks, it won't be played on the radio (steaming) in 30 years.
 
Last edited:
Well if that video does anything it makes me not want to use an iPhone to make a video lol... I know the iPhone takes great videos.. but this was a bad example of it.
 
You are all being a little rough. This was just a demo, showing that you can do stuff like this on an iPhone. It was meant to be a commercial, not great art.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zooby
Cool cool, Korea shoots music videos on Arri Alexa and I prefer that...but this is cool too:p Also why the west slack so hard on MV, where’s the creativity?
 
The days when the stars had a gift are gone...now everybody with todays tech can sing...we will never get artists like Michelangelo or Michael J, or Freddy Mercury or whatever, the days where tech was not took over the artist talent are over since 2002

Sad but true. There are some great voices out there still but they are becoming scarce.
 
Sold. Have now ordered iPhone 11 Pro Max with max Memory, because of Selena. I'm now as cool as Selena. Yeah!
 
The photography is good, the video editing is lame, and the song is just a loop of the same thing x4. It gets boring after the first chorus repetition.
I would rather watch the Adams Family in B&W.
 
This video is a really bad representation of what the iPhone camera can do. Hard to see what you're describing as stunning. The iPhone can produce stunning video, but this ain't it. There are plenty of much better examples of the phone's video capabilities. This video is pretty pedestrian.

Bit of hyperbole you got going there with the DSLR/11PM comparison. People have been shooting movies on iPhones as far back as the iPhone 4. Remember when the Burberry fashion show was shot on an iPhone? People were expressing the same sentiments that you're expressing now. I can pretty much guarantee if you went back to any of the threads about videos/movies shot on iPhone, you can find that exact same sentiment.
Well hotshot, I’m not basing my statement on what a tech reviewer shoots. I own an iPhone 11 Pro Max, and I’m a filmmaker, so I know exactly how great the video is, and why the specs on this phone and the revised interface matter for production.

As far as making a parallel to the Canon 5Ds, I’ve owned those as well, and am extremely well versed in exactly what those cameras benefits and limitations were, in each iteration. Just as with the iPhone, some early adapters used the first version to shoot stuff that’s never really been done with that form factor before, but neither product really hit their stride in terms of video until until years/versions after their debuts. To me, three terrific lenses that seamlessly cover everything between ultrawide and 2x tele, eliminating the need for clunky add-on lenses, plus advanced HDR and high frame rate make this new iPhone a game changer in terms of video, and there will be an explosion of much higher-end production and content being created with it. This will be a sea change. Mark my words.

It’s interesting that you seem to get your jollies by foisting negativity and cynicism onto a post that dares to express deep appreciation for a cutting edge technology and design savvy that most production pros worth their salt will eagerly embrace. Good luck with all that. The rest of us will be over here embracing innovation and making stunning new content.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.