Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Are you sure you’re in the right place? This is not Android.
We’re talking about a company that’s making only ‘white’ headphones, in its name, for decades and still not changing. Where’s the choice for other colors that people asking for?

That’s a fair point about apple but not relevant when talking about watches.
 
I doubt very much the form will change after only 2 years, likely at least 3. Next year’s low hanging fruit:

1. Battery life improvements tied to allowing sleep tracking.

2. Charge speed improvements.

3. Blood oxygen level measurements (Fitbit Garmin already have this using the rear sensor suite).

4. 24/7 1 sec recording of HR vs every 5-10 minutes in the current generation outside of exercise.
 
I doubt very much the form will change after only 2 years, likely at least 3. Next year’s low hanging fruit:

1. Battery life improvements tied to allowing sleep tracking.

2. Charge speed improvements.

3. Blood oxygen level measurements (Fitbit Garmin already have this using the rear sensor suite).

4. 24/7 1 sec recording of HR vs every 5-10 minutes in the current generation outside of exercise.

That would probably make me upgrade from my Series 4. The Series 5 "improvements" just don't float my boat, they're software changes that will most likely come with the Watch OS6, or soon thereafter.
 
Yes the same company that once upon a time only made one size iPhone cause...courage.

Size isn’t form. In fact, iPhone form support my point. Apple don’t change its product form. They iterate. The watch already has 2 sizes. We’re talking about “form” here, changing from square to circular.

(PS: they changed if the products not successful, like Mac Pro., but never on successful products)
 
  • Like
Reactions: yegon
That would probably make me upgrade from my Series 4. The Series 5 "improvements" just don't float my boat, they're software changes that will most likely come with the Watch OS6, or soon thereafter.

Oh I like the idea of the always on screen a ton... but not enough to trade in my $750 SBSS S4 to Apple for $110! just to buy the nearly identical series 5.
 
  • Like
Reactions: inkhorn and oeagleo
Size isn’t form. In fact, iPhone form support my point. Apple don’t change its product form. They iterate. The watch already has 2 sizes. We’re talking about “form” here, changing from square to circular.

(PS: they changed if the products not successful, like Mac Pro., but never on successful products)

iPhone changed form.

We are talking about watches. Go to a watch store and see what sells. That’s money left on the table. Apple know this but want to sell everyone a square watch first so they can milk their money once they release a round. Round is coming.
 
Size isn’t form. In fact, iPhone form support my point. Apple don’t change its product form. They iterate. The watch already has 2 sizes. We’re talking about “form” here, changing from square to circular.

(PS: they changed if the products not successful, like Mac Pro., but never on successful products)

Apple hasn't made any core product before that wasn't basically a computer screen.

You're essentially saying that Apple will not make round watches ever because they have always made rectangular Mac screens. Or that they won't make round matches ever because they use white earphones as a marketing tool.

Apple's traditional lineup:

Desktop computer
Laptop
Tablet
Monitor

These are all limited to being a rectangular design, so the screens have maintained the same form, (although the actual casing forms have changed significantly) as has every other company in the industry. iPods are the exception though they're not a wearable and being round makes them worse to hold.

Watches are a wearable that are typically preferred in a round format - just look at sales globally. You can buy square and rectangular and oval watches, but people prefer the round aesthetic. Apple is new to this space and we don't know where it will end up. We just know they're doing it in the most practical way to start with. They're trying to cram in a lot of tech and the round shape isn't the best way to do that. They would need to increase the device size, and Apple are always cautious with that. They were one of the last onto the phablet fad, and many people here on MR said Apple will never make one. Now it's the norm and people don't even say phablet any more. It's just phone. There is no way you or I can say that Apple will be limited to creating rectangular watches forever because their Macs were always rectangular.

If you asked people years ago if Apple would make an Hermes Edition Watch you'd have been laughed at as some sort of delusional idiot. Apple follow market forces and the round watch is inevitable. No one with any sense listens to anything Apple says about what they will or won't do, or what they do or don't like. They say what suits their product lineup at that moment in time and to cast shade on competitors. They're shameless in doing U-Turns.

When they do it, it'll be a massive deal and selling point. People will flock to it and Apple will call it magical.

It'll be the 'best Apple Watch Apple has ever made'.

Until the next year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oeagleo
You're essentially saying that Apple will not make round watches ever because they have always made rectangular Mac screens.

No, I’m saying Apple will not make a round watch because they’re making a square watch. (Who knows about “ever” but I can bet there’s more chance Apple will give you a yellow AirPods than a round watch in a next 3 years)

Why? If you understand design you’ll understand. When Apple design their products they design it to be “an icon”, an easily recognized subject. A signature of the company so to speak. Apple Watch is not only “an” Apple product, it’s also the market leading one. Changing the form of market leading product not only do away an icon but will create confusion as well.
[doublepost=1568212214][/doublepost]
iPhone changed form.

No, it’s not. Don’t be silly.

Its form is still rectangular with round corner (almost always with the same exact proportion of round corner in every generations as well)

The correct way to say is Apple ‘iterate’ (not change) iPhone design (not form).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yegon
No, I’m saying Apple will not make a round watch because they’re making a square watch. (Who knows about “ever” but I can bet there’s more chance Apple will give you a yellow AirPods than a round watch in a next 3 years)

Why? If you understand design you’ll understand. When Apple design their products they design it to be “an icon”, an easily recognized subject. A signature of the company so to speak. Apple Watch is not only “an” Apple product, it’s also a market leading one. Changing the form of market leading product not only do away an icon but create confusion as well.

Apple Watch isn't iconic. It's just another rectangular smartwatch. They were so late into the market that they had no real way to distinguish themselves with an iconic product. It looks naff generally. I didn't even want one until S3 and they finally stuck GPS in it iirc.

Not every Apple product can be iconic especially now we're in the wearable era. Those days are long since gone. They've tried to keep this iconic design idea going yes, I agree, with a couple of products, and it fell flat. Their stupid speakers and the previous Mac Pro. Pathetic sales.

Apple follow as much as they lead these days with product choice and design. No-one's getting confused about a round Apple Watch, ever. This is the sort of pseud marketing rule that you find on 'guru' blogs.

Apple follow market forces, when they're ready to. That's the only rule I can determine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zxxv
Apple Watch isn't iconic. It's just another rectangular smartwatch. They were so late into the market that they had no real way to distinguish themselves with an iconic product. It looks naff generally. I didn't even want one until S3 and they finally stuck GPS in it iirc.

Not every Apple product can be iconic especially now we're in the wearable era. Those days are long since gone. They've tried to keep this iconic design idea going yes, I agree, with a couple of products, and it fell flat. Their stupid speakers and the previous Mac Pro. Pathetic sales.

Apple follow as much as they lead these days with product choice and design. No-one's getting confused about a round Apple Watch, ever. This is the sort of pseud marketing rule that you find on 'guru' blogs.

Apple follow market forces, when they're ready to. That's the only rule I can determine.

Apple live in the past :(
 
Apple follow as much as they lead these days with product choice and design. No-one's getting confused about a round Apple Watch, ever. This is the sort of pseud marketing rule that you find on 'guru' blogs.

Apple follow market forces, when they're ready to. That's the only rule I can determine.

Apple will follow market forces only after the Advertising department feels that they have convinced the majority of the public that they absolutely NEED the <insert "feature" here>. Until then, Apple will continue to lead with the same <insert feature here> that they already have, touting it as absolutely necessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TJ82
Your post makes no sense. Look at the faces where you could just draw a round circle. Look at mickey, utility, chronograph, explorer, infograph, all watch faces on the latest models that are just round in a square box . . .

I always find posts like this highly amusing, how can you say my opinion makes no sense, perhaps it’s just that you don’t understand it? After all, it is my opinion and it makes perfect sense to me.

Maybe if I explain a little further.

One of the early round Watches was the Moto 360.

A nice looking watch but a lot of wasted screen.

Whilst I don’t think the Apple Watch is as attractive as a conventional round watch it is useful to have the near edge to edge screen in the shape we have now.

I’m one of those that likes a smart watch to display as much information & functionality on the screen at once.

Having not upgraded to WatchOS 6 yet, I use Infograph Modular at the moment as it gives me Time & Date, Calendar and room for 3 additional Complications.

That’s a lot of info on one screen and without looking too cluttered.

A round face would inherently give less room as two of my current Complications fit nicely into the bottom 2 corners.

Even if you could somehow fit all of this functionality on a round face, it’d be far more untidy.

For those who are not bothered about having onscreen access to as many capabilities as possible, however, I can see the attraction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yegon and Zxxv
I don't expect to see a redesign until series 7 or 8. Went from series 0 to series 4 until a redesign, expect it to be pretty similar. I think they held some features back until next years model, which they always do.
 
Although a round design can feel more traditional and perhaps more aesthetically pleasing on a Watch, I’m not so sure it works well with a smart watch as I appreciate the extra screen real estate for information with the face shape we have now.

Ultimately I would like the case to be much thinner, but we’d need to wait for more significant improvements in battery technology to enable that to happen.

This! There's a reason computer screens are square.

triangle_tablet.png
 
I don't expect to see a redesign until series 7 or 8. Went from series 0 to series 4 until a redesign, expect it to be pretty similar. I think they held some features back until next years model, which they always do.
Agree with 7 or 8. If they cut it lose from an iPhone and it has it's own phone account it will need a better antenna.
 
I always find posts like this highly amusing, how can you say my opinion makes no sense, perhaps it’s just that you don’t understand it? After all, it is my opinion and it makes perfect sense to me.

Maybe if I explain a little further.

One of the early round Watches was the Moto 360.

A nice looking watch but a lot of wasted screen.

Whilst I don’t think the Apple Watch is as attractive as a conventional round watch it is useful to have the near edge to edge screen in the shape we have now.

I’m one of those that likes a smart watch to display as much information & functionality on the screen at once.

Having not upgraded to WatchOS 6 yet, I use Infograph Modular at the moment as it gives me Time & Date, Calendar and room for 3 additional Complications.

That’s a lot of info on one screen and without looking too cluttered.

A round face would inherently give less room as two of my current Complications fit nicely into the bottom 2 corners.

Even if you could somehow fit all of this functionality on a round face, it’d be far more untidy.

For those who are not bothered about having onscreen access to as many capabilities as possible, however, I can see the attraction.

Thanks for further clarifying.

I use the plain “modular” watch face for many of the same reasons as you. It’s why an always on display doesn’t interest me for that face as it would show others my personal appointments and reminders.

A round watch like you say at the end of your post would be an attraction for many other people and that’s a lot of money left on the table for apple to not want to capitalise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeanosMagicHat
My 44mm stainless steel black series 4 Apple Watch tells the time, it also happens to do some other cool stuff too.

Round is coming. You can deny the future but it will run right over you.

I don't have an opinion as to whether it will happen or not. It might well be coming, and all apps will lose screen space...
Looking at what Apple are doing with their iPad and iPhone lines, they will probably release a different shape every year.

But I still think that if your priority is time keeping and the watch's look, you will be better served by a traditional wristwatch.
Anyone using the apps the way I do, welcomes the additional screen real estate provided by a rectangular shape.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zxxv
I think anyone expecting any change to the current design, aside from thickness, is setting themselves up for disappointment. They just changed the design last year, the first time since the watch was first released. Anyone holding out hope for a round watch needs to move on. This notion in tech circles that if it doesn't LOOK different then it must not BE different is really annoying. I think it shows an attitude that is, frankly, shallow since the focus is purely on the APPEARANCE of the device and not the functionality. I seriously wonder if people who focus on this so much really just want to be SEEN having the latest and greatest. Lots of people have been taking Apple to task, including in this thread, for favoring form over function in recent years. The Apple Watch is an instance where function has won out over form. I welcome that.
 
I think anyone expecting any change to the current design, aside from thickness, is setting themselves up for disappointment. They just changed the design last year, the first time since the watch was first released. Anyone holding out hope for a round watch needs to move on. This notion in tech circles that if it doesn't LOOK different then it must not BE different is really annoying. I think it shows an attitude that is, frankly, shallow since the focus is purely on the APPEARANCE of the device and not the functionality. I seriously wonder if people who focus on this so much really just want to be SEEN having the latest and greatest. Lots of people have been taking Apple to task, including in this thread, for favoring form over function in recent years. The Apple Watch is an instance where function has won out over form. I welcome that.

Yep. Plus, it's not like anyone looks at a circular smartwatch and says "Wow, nice Rolex...oh, it's actually a Samsung!" The round smartwatches still look like mall kiosk watches, which is fine, but not impressing anyone, if that's what one is after.
 
S6 should come with more new health measure function and Ceramic Grey come back
S7 might re design and comeback with Gold Edition

Should be like this

S0 18k Gold
S2 Ceramic white
S3 Ceramic Grey
S4 SS Gold
S5 Ceramic white + Titanium
S6 Ceramic Grey + Titanium
S7 18k Gold
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.