Your post makes no sense. Look at the faces where you could just draw a round circle. Look at mickey, utility, chronograph, explorer, infograph, all watch faces on the latest models that are just round in a square box . . .
I always find posts like this highly amusing, how can you say my opinion makes no sense, perhaps it’s just that you don’t understand it? After all, it is my opinion and it makes perfect sense to me.
Maybe if I explain a little further.
One of the early round Watches was the Moto 360.
A nice looking watch but a lot of wasted screen.
Whilst I don’t think the Apple Watch is as attractive as a conventional round watch it is useful to have the near edge to edge screen in the shape we have now.
I’m one of those that likes a smart watch to display as much information & functionality on the screen at once.
Having not upgraded to WatchOS 6 yet, I use Infograph Modular at the moment as it gives me Time & Date, Calendar and room for 3 additional Complications.
That’s a lot of info on one screen and without looking too cluttered.
A round face would inherently give less room as two of my current Complications fit nicely into the bottom 2 corners.
Even if you could somehow fit all of this functionality on a round face, it’d be far more untidy.
For those who are not bothered about having onscreen access to as many capabilities as possible, however, I can see the attraction.