An interactive 3D globe doesn't require a neural network to display. Google Earth has had a 3D interactive map for almost fifteen years.
Just to start with the very first bullet point, “Portrait Mode blurred backgrounds in FaceTime videos”, people have been complaining for years that the webcams in Macs are potato cams, and now they’ve replaced those with more capable cameras, backed with a whole lot of (hardware) image processing from the iOS side, and are clearly leveraging their existing Neural Engine code for image processing on the fly, and you want them to backport all that to run on the potato cams? I’d rather they spend their time on features for the new hardware, and only support features on Intel machines that don’t take a lot of extra work to achieve an inferior result - which seems like what they’re doing.This is an outrage. No technical reason this can’t be on Intel.
Forced depreciation in action.
Why waste time on intel?
Yes, the M1 by all accounts is amazing, but quickly dropping Intel Macs would be a bad move for its users, especially considering that iOS is giving almost more support than Mac depending on the Mac model....and we will all be the better for it.
The M1 is the future, Intel is the present and slowly becoming the past.
Personally, I never thought my Intel Mac was "slow" but the upgrade to an M1 has made a real difference in my day-to-day. If you asked me what's changed, I'd say, "Everything."
Just to start with the very first bullet point, “Portrait Mode blurred backgrounds in FaceTime videos”, people have been complaining for years that the webcams in Macs are potato cams, and now they’ve replaced those with more capable cameras, backed with a whole lot of (hardware) image processing from the iOS side, and are clearly leveraging their existing Neural Engine code for image processing on the fly, and you want them to backport all that to run on the potato cams? I’d rather they spend their time on features for the new hardware, and only support features on Intel machines that don’t take a lot of extra work to achieve an inferior result - which seems like what they’re doing.
Because Apple is still selling Intel-based Macs.
I'm pretty sure Intel chips and handle those new features in MacOS. You really believe leaving those features out of the Intel based systems was not intentional?
Because Apple is still selling Intel-based Macs.
Why are you acting as if a computer is NOT an investment with future support? Are you aware that there are Mac Pros that people have spent literally tens of thousands of dollars, or do you think Apple only makes low end consumer grade stuff?How, exactly, is anyone hosed? Your computer has the same features it had yesterday.
say it’s intentional. How does that force you to buy a new machine? You didn’t even know these were features you wanted three days ago.
Not with Monterey. So the machines they sell today can do everything the M1 macs can do (other than run ios/ipad apps).
I think that's a bit of an exaggeration.Yeah, they are possible if you are ok with waiting couple of seconds while your machine analyses the photo and sucks battery like crazy at the same time. Come on, be realistic. Presence of ultra-efficient on-board ML hardware does offer some new applications.