Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
An interactive 3D globe doesn't require a neural network to display. Google Earth has had a 3D interactive map for almost fifteen years.

Please tell us more of your insight into the iOS-based framework API stack that this feature is built upon, and why Apple should have chosen to devote dev resources onto a legacy ported app built on a legacy stack... 🤔
 
This is an outrage. No technical reason this can’t be on Intel.
Forced depreciation in action.
Just to start with the very first bullet point, “Portrait Mode blurred backgrounds in FaceTime videos”, people have been complaining for years that the webcams in Macs are potato cams, and now they’ve replaced those with more capable cameras, backed with a whole lot of (hardware) image processing from the iOS side, and are clearly leveraging their existing Neural Engine code for image processing on the fly, and you want them to backport all that to run on the potato cams? I’d rather they spend their time on features for the new hardware, and only support features on Intel machines that don’t take a lot of extra work to achieve an inferior result - which seems like what they’re doing.
 
...and we will all be the better for it.

The M1 is the future, Intel is the present and slowly becoming the past.

Personally, I never thought my Intel Mac was "slow" but the upgrade to an M1 has made a real difference in my day-to-day. If you asked me what's changed, I'd say, "Everything."
Yes, the M1 by all accounts is amazing, but quickly dropping Intel Macs would be a bad move for its users, especially considering that iOS is giving almost more support than Mac depending on the Mac model.

They are quite expensive equipment (in Europe even more so), and although I understand the reason for leaving them aside (the M1 allows a faster and more integrated introduction of new features thanks to its architecture), it does not seem fair to me for users of 5 years ago Mac. (because dangerously close to leaving without updates to the MacBook 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Just to start with the very first bullet point, “Portrait Mode blurred backgrounds in FaceTime videos”, people have been complaining for years that the webcams in Macs are potato cams, and now they’ve replaced those with more capable cameras, backed with a whole lot of (hardware) image processing from the iOS side, and are clearly leveraging their existing Neural Engine code for image processing on the fly, and you want them to backport all that to run on the potato cams? I’d rather they spend their time on features for the new hardware, and only support features on Intel machines that don’t take a lot of extra work to achieve an inferior result - which seems like what they’re doing.

Laptops still have potato cams. So they must have already backported it?
 
Like any business, if Apple sees a way to earn more money it will. Limiting certain features to M1, Apple hopes to push more users to buy an M1. Well I already have both! Hah! Tim Cook. You get to only force me to buy a new Mac if I want to. LOL!!
 
This is crap.

I’m generally understanding of them dropping support for things after a period of time. No company should be expected to support things forever. But unless there is a true hardware reason for this I call BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rumormiller
So, I can go onto apple.com and buy a maxed out intel Mac Pro that will cost over £52,000, and it won’t run all the features in Monterey!!! 😱
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rumormiller
Not with Monterey. So the machines they sell today can do everything the M1 macs can do (other than run ios/ipad apps).

I wouldn’t want to buy an Intel Mac today and find out that’s changing in only a few months.
 
What would be great if Apple gave more credit than it normally does for trading in an Intel Mac!!! That's one way Apple can get the Intel Macs gone for good!
 
Yeah, they are possible if you are ok with waiting couple of seconds while your machine analyses the photo and sucks battery like crazy at the same time. Come on, be realistic. Presence of ultra-efficient on-board ML hardware does offer some new applications.
I think that's a bit of an exaggeration.
 
“Apple has not explained why…”
Well…could it be because it’s throwaway work at this point?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.