You don't have Chip and PIN? So paying by card still involves signing a bit of paper??I would prefer just getting some Chip and PIN readers/cards here in the US.
You don't have Chip and PIN? So paying by card still involves signing a bit of paper??I would prefer just getting some Chip and PIN readers/cards here in the US.
Still I never got why Amex asks double the fee that Visa and MasterCard charge. It is a surefire way of pricing yourself out of the market. Many businesses in Europe refuse Amex because of it and they lose a lot of business. They must have done their own calculations on this, but somehow I'm surprised that the income from the higher fee can compensate for the loss of business of that same fee rate.
Still I never got why Amex asks double the fee that Visa and MasterCard charge. It is a surefire way of pricing yourself out of the market. Many businesses in Europe refuse Amex because of it and they lose a lot of business. They must have done their own calculations on this, but somehow I'm surprised that the income from the higher fee can compensate for the loss of business of that same fee rate.[
It was the nicer way of saying CurrentCrap
3 years and only testing in one US city? While Apple and Google are eating their lunch worldwide?How about 'PastC'
CurrentC - what an incredibly lame name...
Cutting out the credit providers could have have been a profitable goal, but these guys make the credit companies look benevolent.Ok, forget Apple Pay even exists. Same for Google/Samsung options. Even without those, who the hell would want to use this clunky mess of a system?!
It could have been a way of cutting out the credit fees, instead they found ways to make the card companies look benevolent.Ok, forget Apple Pay even exists. Same for Google/Samsung options. Even without those, who the hell would want to use this clunky mess of a system?!
How is this uncompetitive and how is this a monopoly?
Charging via a debit or credit card is one of the many ways (cash, check, money order, ACH, etc.) to pay for goods and services in the US. Therefore, it's inherently competitive. Not only that, but Apple Pay, Google Wallet, and others have successfully broken into the payment market and there currently exists multiple payment processing companies. To say the market is uncompetitive is just false. It may have a high barrier of entry, true, but uncompetitive it is not.
As for a monopoly, again, paying by card is not an exclusive option or a right. Visa and MasterCard are two completely different companies - if it were an '-opoly' of any kind (which it's not) it certainly wouldn't be a 'mon'. These companies are offering a service and I think they should be compensated for establishing an easy-to-use and ubiquitous payment network.
If the market thinks that the transaction fees for credit card services are too high, then it will make an alternative. The single failure of CurrentC is not a signature of the market being uncompetitive or monopolistic, they just had crappy marketing on top of a crappy idea.
I have signed paper before at smaller, local establishments when using my card. There is always cash too. A younger colleague thought I was an old fogey for having a decent amount of cash in my wallet to change out or loan. They where paying people using an online payment system that allowed them to email/text the money to someone else.You don't have Chip and PIN? So paying by card still involves signing a bit of paper??
That name always reminds me of an orange flavored vitamin C supplement.Now now. I'm sure a roomful of ponytails spent several minutes riffing on a theme to come up with that gem.
I wonder what those statistics are for the rest of the planet, as I always get dirty faces when I try to pay with my corporate card. It sucks that my employer (A UK company) pushes the least accepted card (well maybe with the exception of Diner's Card) on us, making us front much of our business expenses ourselves.
How is this uncompetitive and how is this a monopoly?
Charging via a debit or credit card is one of the many ways (cash, check, money order, ACH, etc.) to pay for goods and services in the US. Therefore, it's inherently competitive. Not only that, but Apple Pay, Google Wallet, and others have successfully broken into the payment market and there currently exists multiple payment processing companies. To say the market is uncompetitive is just false. It may have a high barrier of entry, true, but uncompetitive it is not.
As for a monopoly, again, paying by card is not an exclusive option or a right. Visa and MasterCard are two completely different companies - if it were an '-opoly' of any kind (which it's not) it certainly wouldn't be a 'mon'. These companies are offering a service and I think they should be compensated for establishing an easy-to-use and ubiquitous payment network.
If the market thinks that the transaction fees for credit card services are too high, then it will make an alternative. The single failure of CurrentC is not a signature of the market being uncompetitive or monopolistic, they just had crappy marketing on top of a crappy idea.
They are well past the point of this being relevant. Newer phones typically have Google Pay, Apple Pay and even Samsung Pay preinstalled. Why would people install yet another pay system to their phone? People with older phones without NFC support typically aren't typically the tech savvy people who would want to pay using their phones anyway.