Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
CEO compensation is so enormously out of whack with their specific contribution.

I'm all for everyone getting paid a ton more, way down the chain though
Just because a company issues common shares to raise capital doesn't mean that any shareholders that have this opinion will ever get their way. It's always been argued for years that the CEO is overpaid, and most of them are but that is determined by the board of directors. Still the CEO is a lightning rod for everything that goes wrong with a company and also when a company succeeds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Not sure the lifetime of a person, no matter how good they are at what they do, is 100 or thousand times worth than that of any other. Apple has like 150 thousand employees. If you really wanna throw out a hundred million dollars of incentives you can just as well split those up among all of them, according to their base salary. It's not that I think that Tim Apple doesn't deserve it - but the people that make the company deserve their share just as much.
 
They should give him anything he wants. You can disagree with the pricing and product line-up, but he's probably the best CEO of all time.
lol.. no he road the coat tails of the best ceo of all time.

having said that: when your company is 3T.. 100M is nothing.
 
No opinion other than I wish Tim would retire

I'm ready for a new direction for the company

If Apple was underperforming and coming out with ****** products, I'd agree with you. But they are firing on all cylinders and continue to bring out impressive, well-engineered products and services. Are they perfect in every way? No way, but that's not the point. Apple continues to be where the competition is aiming, and Tim is a major leader of that vision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djphat2000
Be a lot harder to recruit executive level and other top jobs if you don't want to pay vs. company success and earnings. People may not like some things Apple produces but the market does
 
while that amount of money is revolting, it's just the lay of the land these days. Cook has presided over unprecedented growth and is at the helm of the world's most valuable public corporation. by all metrics given that playbook - he def deserves it. $99M is chump change to Apple overall and none of it affects any of our day to day lives, so whatevs.

I just wish the people who helped actually make and drive all that profit in the very real sense of those doing the actual labor were considered by the board and shareholders. but again, this is America and our system is built to crush employees, reward the owners.

same can be said for professional athletes. they make a yearly salary the average person could never realize in a lifetime. but then what they make compared to the team owners is peanuts.

the stratification of the American worker vs CEO is mind boggling and without any real congressional leadership or oversight since most everyone in congress is bought off by these same corporations, this is just what we get.
 
Apple Store employees get a 2% to 10% pay raise, Tim Cook gets $99 million.

Seems fair because Inflation. :confused:
I just cant stand this mentality. Its not at all comparable but people keep wanting to do it. If those people want cooks salary they can go become CEOs. Being a CEO (especially for apple) is not an easy thing to achieve or do. There isn't a single store employee that cant be replaced in a day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ValueArb
Only in America.

I can only assume/hope that all the other 100's of 1000's of employees Apple has, from designer, engineers, and everyone in between get decent compensation packages. If, as the article suggests, Cook's proposed package is way above that of CEO's of similar companies, then absolutely it should be looked at and discussed. Apple isn't just a personal piggy bank for the man at the top, however much money the company is worth.
Apple has 80,000 employees (not hundreds of thousands) according to: https://www.apple.com/job-creation/
 
  • Like
Reactions: ValueArb


Apple shareholders are being urged to vote against a planned $99 million compensation package for Apple CEO Tim Cook, reports Financial Times. Shareholder advisory group Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) said on Wednesday that there is a "significant concern" with the stock Cook was awarded in 2021.

Apple-Logo-Cash-Feature-Blue.jpg

Cook last year was awarded stock valued at $82 million, along with a $3 million salary and a $12 million bonus, and the stock award was the first incentive package he had been granted since his 2011 package was granted in full for his tenure at Apple.

According to ISS, Cook's 2021 compensation "significantly exceeded" that provided by comparable companies last year. It has been seven years since ISS last objected to Apple's pay packages.

Shareholder votes on the compensation that Apple provides to executives are advisory, and the board is not required to take action. Financial Times says that if there is backlash over Cook's pay, it could potentially sway Apple's board. In its proxy statement, Apple says that it will "continue to consider shareholder feedback and the results of say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions."

Under Cook's 10-year leadership, Apple has seen continued success and in January, briefly became the first company to hit a $3 trillion valuation. Apple executive compensation is tied to company performance, and Apple has regularly hit its targets.

Article Link: Shareholders Advisory Group Doesn't Want Tim Cook to Get $99 Million Pay Package
Is this why I pay so much for Apple products?
 
I just cant stand this mentality. Its not at all comparable but people keep wanting to do it. If those people want cooks salary they can go become CEOs. Being a CEO (especially for apple) is not an easy thing to achieve or do. There isn't a single store employee that cant be replaced in a day.
You don't see the CEO vs regular worker pay gap as a problem?


 
Imagine how many silicon engineers Apple could hire for $99 million.

How many Apple Car engineers, iOS engineers, and hardware people?

I bet $99 million would be enough to make AirPower come to market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yammabot


Apple shareholders are being urged to vote against a planned $99 million compensation package for Apple CEO Tim Cook, reports Financial Times. Shareholder advisory group Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) said on Wednesday that there is a "significant concern" with the stock Cook was awarded in 2021.

Apple-Logo-Cash-Feature-Blue.jpg

Cook last year was awarded stock valued at $82 million, along with a $3 million salary and a $12 million bonus, and the stock award was the first incentive package he had been granted since his 2011 package was granted in full for his tenure at Apple.

According to ISS, Cook's 2021 compensation "significantly exceeded" that provided by comparable companies last year. It has been seven years since ISS last objected to Apple's pay packages.

Shareholder votes on the compensation that Apple provides to executives are advisory, and the board is not required to take action. Financial Times says that if there is backlash over Cook's pay, it could potentially sway Apple's board. In its proxy statement, Apple says that it will "continue to consider shareholder feedback and the results of say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions."

Under Cook's 10-year leadership, Apple has seen continued success and in January, briefly became the first company to hit a $3 trillion valuation. Apple executive compensation is tied to company performance, and Apple has regularly hit its targets.

Article Link: Shareholders Advisory Group Doesn't Want Tim Cook to Get $99 Million Pay Package
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.