2 x 23" will always be better than 1 x 30".
Although 2 x 30" will be the best.
Here is an advice given by Chris Pirillo.
I'll get another 23" if I'm you. Having 2 same-sized monitors side by side seems more "balanced" to me. lol. It is definitely aesthetically nicer.
One thing you need to remember is the colour on the new monitor, whichever you go for, will be brighter and more vibrant than your old 23". It may not be possible to calibrate both monitors to the same exact colour configuration. So this is something you should be aware of.
stop flaming the OP everyone, please. Thanks.
IMO 30" ACD is too expensive...wait for them to be updated at least or perhaps come down in price. When were these things last updated anyways? You're paying old prices for "old" technology.
You know I'm actually thinking about keeping my 23" as well to use on the side next to the 30".. I guess I wont know unless I try it but if its way too overkill then I'll sell my 23" but if its nice I'll keep them both. After selling my 17" hi res 2.5ghz mbp model I'll still have about $1k left to put in the bank so not bad at all.![]()
For the love o' Pete... whatever. Overkill? What's that? Someone could argue that one 17" is overkill. For what it's worth, I'm a dual monitor guy, be it 17's, 23's, 30's. Had I the resources (and the space) I'd do dual 52's. Screen real estate is like hard drive space - no matter what you've got, you're going to fill it up. I've got a 23" main and a 17" secondary, and I've managed to fill every inch with palettes and timelines and iChats. As a result, I'm getting another 23". I mean, really - you might as well ask "I'm struggling with wether or not I should get a 500 GB or 750 GB hard drive... but 750 GB might be overkill. What do you think?"
Here's the trick: figure out what it is you need for what you do and do that.
Well I'm sure that for you the dual 23 or 23" and an additional 17" is perfect for you but I'm just saying for me the dual 23" will be overkill. I think the single 30" would be more than enough for everything I'd want to be running, I dont photoshop,fcp,aperture or any of that. I just multitask ALOT so I think it could work.. either way I'll have to check out the 30" again tomarrow to see.
Pretty much I use word, excel sometimes, like to have 2 webpages open next to each other, azureus,parallels, wow open (sometimes), visual hub, dictionary (sometimes), itunes. I guess I could squeeze most of these stuff in 1 30", and 23" I know forsure I can separate the two... hmm.. I could watch a video while working as well on the 2nd 23".. you made me think again, lol.![]()
Oh... my head...
I think that 52" Bravia you have is overkill, btw...![]()
HEHE, the sony bravia is my favorite toy out of the lot of course next to the mac pro! No regrets whatsoever on the 52" bravia!! I came from a dlp projector of 180" of screen size though...but quality is compared to NONE against the bravia xbr4 =D
LOL - well, I do admire your endless enthusiasm.
And I'd take the 52" over a projection as well... as a matter of fact, I've a 52" Samsung LCD - and I love every chance I get to watch a film on it. Funny enough, it's smaller pixel-wise than my 23", but the 23" looks much better at a 18" viewing distance.
At any rate... just go dual "30. You know you want to.![]()
Be done with it....................
Sell the 20" and 23" and get a second 30". Remember the longer you wait, the more dissimilar the two screens will become. You know you want to........
It really is fun spending other people's money. I should have been a buyer
So do you guys think its better to go 23"ACDx2 or 1x30" ACD....
I'd vote for getting the 30". I'm dying to get one, but am waiting a while to see if they're updated sometime by the summer.
Now I'm deciding if I'd want to keep my 23" to go along the right side of the 30". It is nice to have an extra monitor but it seems that its unnecessary for the extra 23".