I don’t agree with that at all. Totally fine us disagreeing here, but one of Apple’s biggest selling points is privacy.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Siri on HomePod Correctly Answered 52.3% of Queries in New AI Test
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I don’t agree with that at all. Totally fine us disagreeing here, but one of Apple’s biggest selling points is privacy.
Apple does need to make SIRI a bit more natural.... Hopefully with the introduction of the HomePod, it will get them to really up the game.
Overall I have really like the speaker, but I do find I miss things like "play WBUR" or some other local radio station that SIRI just doesn't play.
As for connecting to the AppleTV, the sound is fantastic! This is a huge plus for this speaker!
Overall I have really like the speaker, but I do find I miss things like "play WBUR" or some other local radio station that SIRI just doesn't play.
As for connecting to the AppleTV, the sound is fantastic! This is a huge plus for this speaker!
If you want crappy and/or oversized fugly speakers with useless AI features that no one realistically will use then yes, Apple definately missed the mark on this one.
The tragedy is that the article used the misleading term "answered correctly." Since there are a lot of people who don't read the entire articles they assume that Siri got them wrong, but as you read more carefully, it was largely that the questions were in domains that Apple hasn't activated yet. It would have been more accurate to phrase it as "able to perform." Indeed, the article actually vindicates the idea that Siri is greatly underrated by uniformed critics as if Apple had activated all the domains, Siri would have had a greater accuracy than both Amazon and Cortana and much closer to Google.
It's a smart speaker being compared to smart speakers. Are you saying the comparison should only include the things the HomePod can do and ignore what the other speakers can do? Apple chose to emphasize the speaker over the smart. Over time, that might end up being considered the better decision. But no comparison should be based on what 1 contender does or doesn't have. Run whatcha brung.
But to suggest it get special consideration because Apple gimped it's initial capability is... yeah, no. I mean, should the Harmon Invoke's Cortana get a pass on commerce since it did just as badly as Siri did with Navigation? No, it shouldn't and neither should the HomePod.
Most of us don't buy based on these comparisons. We buy based on our use case. If I don't need nav on my smart speaker, why would I care if it did badly? I wouldn't. Trying to stack the deck for Siri really doesn't help the perception of Apple's assistant. Siri's rep is a fairly cemented consensus in the general sense. Whether you agree with the majority or the minority... still doesn't matter. People buying the HomePod know Siri's limitations and buy anyway. My brother is an Apple freak. He purchased the HomePod to Apple Music from a dedicated iPad. No Siri. The speaker is going to sell to those who want it. No need for a handicap in comparisons.
How is this research? I've been in research and this doesn't even come close, except as research in click bait, then bravo you did well whatever company issued this "study" (sic).
Firstly, I don't fully buy the argument it is all about privacy. Siri's basic search results just SUCK! That has nothing to do with [privacy]. Also, the voice recognition is far behind and is only starting to get better. I remember being on business in a city, and Siri couldn't even understand the city name. It was a major city!
I am seriously tired of using siri and it returning "here is what it says on wiki" or "I can't help you with that". I then use the chrome browser and say "google" . And most times it nails it! So that has NOTHING to do with privacy.
Let's say we believe Tim Cooks Argument that it's about privacy (this is the same man who says they follow the spirit of the tax law and claim all revenue is really all from Apple Ireland), why not put in the terms and agreements not to mine the data or use it for Advertisement. OR, give users the choice.
Lastly, I am going to say this. The best assistants know you and anticipate your needs. Siri is a horrid assistant, and can't really do anything. So here is the dilemma. To embrace the future or not, because at this point siri is a useless as my post (which no one will probably read)
Last edited:
Apple will improve Siri a lot now that they are in this game. Wait and see.
A lot of this stuff is useless anyway.
A lot of this stuff is useless anyway.
We all know Siri is horrible. But why does Apple not fix it? Or just use the Google Assistant and focus on hardware.
Likely because they don't see it as a major issue. They see it as something that does very basic tasks and to be honest for my use case does whats required.
I didn't buy the homepod because of the voice assistant. I bought it for the great sound and working well with my other devices. I'm sure many who have bought the homepod didn't buy it because they think siri is amazing.
I ask my Google Home navigation questions before I leave the house and it’s says it’ll send it to my phone. When I pick my phone up I just click on it and off I go.
Maybe we should be more concerned that it has “superior listening skills”.
With Amazon, Google and Apple your never alone because they are always listening.
even when music from the speaker is particularly loud, and Siri will pick up on the voice and hear the user.
With Amazon, Google and Apple your never alone because they are always listening.
even when music from the speaker is particularly loud, and Siri will pick up on the voice and hear the user.
Sitting on my couch watching the Olympics I might want to tell Siri that I need to be at xyz location at a specific time and to remind me to leave so that I won’t be late.
Yes the sound quality reviews got me.
And it does sound amazing. However I get there are legitimate criticisms. i don’t think it’s an either or between great sound and superior smarts. I think it should have both. Including a music domain for Siri. And if it did have all that Apple would have a clear marketing advantage. Still I’ll mostly use it as a speaker right and for that it’s amazing. Much better than my Bose Soundlink mini.
Siri works just fine for me, especially with respect to interacting with HomePod. So far it's batting a thousand in bringing up music I want to play across a wide range of genres, and for basic control.
I'm not looking for much more beyond that when interacting with HomePod.
I'm not looking for much more beyond that when interacting with HomePod.
You’re riffing. The numbers Apple just put up in Q1 proves Apple has insane loyalty and pricing power. $800 iPhone ASP. $88.3BB in revenue in 90 days. $20B in profit, the most ever by Apple and the most by any company ever. 13% sales growth y/y. 99% customer satisfaction. I could go on.
Software and ecosystem still matter and Apple customers will pay for iOS.
The Honor 9 is not an iPhone. Apple customers won’t go Android, at least now. Not everyone wants a budget phone. If it works well for you, great. Some of us pay for software.
It’s just like cars. Any car will get you from point A to point B. But people by Mercedes and BMWs for a reason.
I don't know, maybe Siri is just good at what I ask of it.
At home all I ask it to do is turn on or off lights, occasionally set a timer and that about it.
In the car it reads and responds texts just fine and nails the destination I ask for around the Dallas Fort Worth metroplex very consistently even with the seemingly continuous construction we have.
For replacing my Echo at home, it will serve its purpose.
It will look a bit better, sound a lot better and at this point that is all I really care for it to do.
I am not really in to bashing Apple or a product, if it didn't work for me for what I needed it to do, it'll go back to the store way ahead of that 14 day return period. I can not understand buying something, hating it and then keeping it. I will know in 2-3 days tops if I'm keeping it or not.
At home all I ask it to do is turn on or off lights, occasionally set a timer and that about it.
In the car it reads and responds texts just fine and nails the destination I ask for around the Dallas Fort Worth metroplex very consistently even with the seemingly continuous construction we have.
For replacing my Echo at home, it will serve its purpose.
It will look a bit better, sound a lot better and at this point that is all I really care for it to do.
I am not really in to bashing Apple or a product, if it didn't work for me for what I needed it to do, it'll go back to the store way ahead of that 14 day return period. I can not understand buying something, hating it and then keeping it. I will know in 2-3 days tops if I'm keeping it or not.
“It’s also an intelligent home assistant, capable of handling everyday tasks — and controlling your smart home. “
I’d say Apple is trying to pitch this as a smart speaker. Using “but audio quality” is an excuse to justify price and poor Siri performance.
I’d say Apple is trying to pitch this as a smart speaker. Using “but audio quality” is an excuse to justify price and poor Siri performance.
