Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Applications open as fast as switching a window, it has OpenGL, Vulkan, Nvidia cards, ports, slots, endless RAM and yesterday I bought another 1TB NVMe PCIe SSD for 200$.

I‘m free again.

Basically, the Mac isn’t for you.

It’s like me saying for my Mac: it has Handoff, Bear, Fantastical, shared clipboard with my iPad, iMessage, Things, iCloud.... I’m free again.

These things above are things I really need in my workflow. So, your Linux machine is not freedom for me, because I can’t do anything on it. It’s not for me. Just like the Mac isn’t for you. For me and what I do, it’s the best platform available, and since I use Shortcuts daily - they will be a great addition to the Mac for me.

I never understood people who want Mac to become a PC. Just get a PC. It’s the best PC there is. Mac will never be a better PC than a PC and PC will never be a better Mac than a Mac. Choose accordingly.
 
To run Mac OS you need a Mac. Does Apple still make Macs?

The top of the line Mac Pro is 6 years old with 4+ year old hardware. The Macbook Pro has keys that stick. The Mac mini is MIA. The iMacs have 5200RPM hard drives that I had in my Mac 10 years ago and replaced with SSDs. Shouldn't all Mac come standard with SSDs in 2019?. I am still using my 2008 Mac Pro and am waiting for a compelling upgrade.

How does the worlds most valuable company forget to do what brought them to the dance?
I guess the heroin of iPhone profit has killed the golden Apple of innovation. "Can't innovate my ass" is right.

Doesn't matter. You continue to use them so they can't be that bad. They just get the job done.
 
[doublepost=1555797341][/doublepost]

No, it’s just someone who doesn’t understand how great Shortcuts can be.
[doublepost=1555797567][/doublepost]

Because of 3rd party apps, ease of use and Continuity. I want to be able to use the same developer designed actions for 3rd party apps and I want to use the same automation I have set up on my iPad on my Mac, too.

Can AppleScript/Automater can already accomplish a lot more than what’s shortcuts can and has since OSX
 
Bravo.

I also don’t understand the sudden influx of macrumor newbies with less than 10 posts all complaining about lack of headphone ports or too many emoji or whatnot.

I thought I was the only one that noticed.
 
Bravo.

I also don’t understand the sudden influx of macrumor newbies with less than 10 posts all complaining about lack of headphone ports or too many emoji or whatnot.

If you’re referring to me ... lol I’ve been a Mac and iOS user for years and I’ve been a member on these boards just as long and have over 200 posts.

The reply to mine I’ll respond to in a few hours just tired ATM.

However it’s alredy been said in the quoted reply to me that Automator hasn’t been actively developed and yet Shortcuts is. Shortcuts is focusing on siri which is being rewritten and I feel it’s current limitations as described prior, will replace Automator with such limitations and affect many workflows (real workflows) for so many and hurt those like myself that are heavily interested.

Shortcuts is not very clear to the typical user ... in terms of what actions could be done and what cannot. Are verbs, adjectives of any nature fully understood? To what level of system apps can be utilized. Automator I can visually and physically guide it to learn what I want then, see the code. Shortcuts is not like this.
 
Can AppleScript/Automater can already accomplish a lot more than what’s shortcuts can and has since OSX

Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger could already accomplish a lot more than iPhone OS 1.0 could. Shortcuts will evolve faster than Automator has in recent years, and at some point surpass it.
 
Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger could already accomplish a lot more than iPhone OS 1.0 could. Shortcuts will evolve faster than Automator has in recent years, and at some point surpass it.

What makes you so certain?! Over the last few months Apple has not really pushed marketing on Shortcuts like when it first debuted. very interesting tell really.
 
What makes you so certain?! Over the last few months Apple has not really pushed marketing on Shortcuts like when it first debuted. very interesting tell really.

I’m not certain of anything, but Shortcuts is off to a decent start and only in its first year (if you don’t count Workflow). Automator is fourteen years old and never seemed much of a hit. AppleScript has a syntax too confusing for newbies and too limiting and different for more experienced coders. I wouldn’t mind a fresh take at all that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: afir93
Can AppleScript/Automater can already accomplish a lot more than what’s shortcuts can and has since OSX

Still can’t accomplish 3rd party app automation in apps like Bear, also - no parity with iOS.

And - shortcuts is really easy to use. Not everyone knows AppleScript.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: afir93
There absolutely has to be an 'off' switch for iMessage effects/stickers/spam.
But knowing modern Apple; there won't be.

I would suggest as a matter of urgency that everyone disables any OS auto-update settings they have.
 
There absolutely has to be an 'off' switch for iMessage effects/stickers/spam.
But knowing modern Apple; there won't be.

I would suggest as a matter of urgency that everyone disables any OS auto-update settings they have.

You can mute any discussion, you have a Do Not Disturb mode, you can block people, you can filter unknown senders and you can also disable iMessage notifications. I honestly don’t know what more “modern Apple” can do for you. If you don’t want people from your contacts list sending you stickers, perhaps you should take it up with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim and afir93
I’m not certain of anything, but Shortcuts is off to a decent start and only in its first year (if you don’t count Workflow). Automator is fourteen years old and never seemed much of a hit. AppleScript has a syntax too confusing for newbies and too limiting and different for more experienced coders. I wouldn’t mind a fresh take at all that.

I feel AppleScript wasn’t limited just the coders understanding of it. Age of a programming standard doesn’t really mean anything. So theoughing it out like that (Automator) doesn’t help your stance in a rebuttal, substantiate it. It’s a lot more powerful than Shortcuts, for how long we don’t know but if Apple through a it out before Shortcuts is matured to handle what Automator offers then I’m not too thrilled yet I wouldn’t be surprised given who’s in charge of macOS.
 
I used to think the same way too, and I toyed around with the workflow app (before it was acquired by Apple and renamed Shortcuts) for more than 2 years without much to show for it. It was only recently that something clicked and I began to tinker with the shortcuts app with renewed focus.

The trick I learned with automation is that you need to always be on the lookout for repeated actions you carry out on a regular basis. These are ripe to be streamlined.
7e4db5a86488e3628d7f0e0a8d82a636.jpg


For instance, I was charged with planning relief for teachers who were away from school last term (Jan to March). Based on my experience last year, I came up with 4 shortcuts.

1) Relief - I have a google calendar to record the staff who will be away from school for that day. This shortcut lets me quickly enter the necessary details into a new entry in google calendar.

2) Who needs relief - grabs the number of calendar events in the relief calendar and shows it to me. Basically shows me who will not be around for that day.

3) Open google doc - a ton of the google documents I use for planning relief is there, such as teacher timetables. I use this for quickly accessing them.

4) Email relief lesson plan - sends an email to the entire school, containing the link to the relief planning document. I had a variable to insert the date for that day, so it saves me having to type a different date every day.

The improvement here isn’t just time, but also the removal of friction, especially when these shortcuts are activated with Siri. The draw is that I only have to code them once. I am done with my relief stint for the year, I used those shortcuts every day (some multiple times), and they will still be around for when my turn comes again next year.

The funny thing here is that I have never touched the Automator app. It’s probably a very powerful and versatile tool for whatever the hardcore users here use it for. I just never got the hang of it, and maybe that’s the issue. Apple is not going to waste resources supporting a niche feature that only a small, albeit vocal group of users use. Better to just bring shortcuts to macOS, where the Apple team can better focus on just maintaining one feature set rather than 2.

I think what Apple wants to do is automation more accessible to the masses. I am not sure if I will use shortcuts as much on the Mac, but I am willing to give it a go.

Still waiting for some repetitive task that could benefit from this. Any that I have seem too complex for shortcuts, although I admit, I haven't tried it yet. Maybe I'll give it another look when the time comes. Thank you for your reply, that was very kind. :)
 
Still waiting for some repetitive task that could benefit from this. Any that I have seem too complex for shortcuts, although I admit, I haven't tried it yet. Maybe I'll give it another look when the time comes. Thank you for your reply, that was very kind. :)

The other possibility for you are sequences of tasks you may not realize you do together, such as things you do when you leave work or get in a car.

A good place to start is the Gallery section of Shortcuts. A lot of the items there are social media oriented but many others are good foundations for other things. Also, you get to see how they’re structured.
 
Still waiting for some repetitive task that could benefit from this. Any that I have seem too complex for shortcuts, although I admit, I haven't tried it yet. Maybe I'll give it another look when the time comes. Thank you for your reply, that was very kind. :)
I get what you mean. My workflows are either pretty basic or modified from other workflows downloaded from the net. And I had workflow installed on my iPhone for 2 years and not really doing much until it all just "clicked" one day.

Hope you will find some use for said app in the future, but don't sweat it if you don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppleInLVX
I want Apple to do better than it has for a long time.

For me the decline started with OS X Lion and iMovie 08.

I'm primarily a Mac user more than iPhone, and the software quality has just been really poor. Remember when iWork and iLife got better each year? They had leapfrogged Microsoft with Keynote, and then the last update I tried was a disaster--the one where they tried to make it compatible with the iOS version by crippling the Mac version. Even Spotlight used to work better. QuickTime was more powerful. MacOS has bad networking reliability and just so many bugs.

And now there's not a single Mac laptop I could recommend to a friend/family member nor one I'd want to buy myself.

At some point, Apple did bite the corporate dust, and that can largely be attributed to Tim Cook not being the same exact visionary as Jobs. He has openly stated that he will never be Steve Jobs, yet it seems we cannot accept the fact that Jobs is no longer here on Earth with us. I really think a lot of the complaints are part of a veiled mourning process that we've transposed onto Apple as a company. Tim runs Apple like a team vision whereas Steve Jobs really led the team to execute upon his ultimate vision. However selfish that may appear, Steve was the standard of Apple. Tim Cook is a genius businessman and seems to really have a passion for the process and for seeing the beauty in efficiency, which was likely Jobs's weak suit. You can't reinvent the wheel constantly and have it be iterative at the same time: which is why we saw so many transitions and so many ports and wasted effort. Tim's allowing of Apple to stabilize is what brought them to a place of engineering consistency. Plus, let's not put it past us the amount of complexity and error involved in developing a product we've come to expect as being this perfectly refined unit where the only thing we should ever do is buy and unpackage the thing. Unfortunately, these feats of engineering that we call the iPhone and MacBook Pro are just, at their core, subject to the same laws of physics we are. Apple is not the extent of the magic available to the universe, but it's pretty inspirational that they seem to have approximated it in many of ways: so much that we have come to hold them to completely unrealistic demands that the company seems to relish in its pursuits of perfection.

I think what I would like to say to everyone is: be patient with Apple. Be a friend and a supporter. For as long as their technology is artificial, they will always have kinks and flaws, and that comes with buying the product. Is an engineer's work ever complete?

And also, let's not forget the fact that prepackaged technology has caused us to become very out-of-touch, and self-entitlement over it is rampant. Again, Apple is not the new God, despite appearances. I think many of us had a personal relationship to Steve as an icon that was abruptly shattered as Apple itself became the new icon for us. Apple used to be a wonderful teenage cult that just no longer is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: gwhizkids
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.