Why do you think so? Intel will massively replace all chips in the second quarter of 2015
Desktop, yes. But mobile always lags behind the desktop variants because of the additional engineering and testing involved to keep TDP and heat to a minimum.
Why do you think so? Intel will massively replace all chips in the second quarter of 2015
I think you are losing out on a year of utilizing significant performance gains in Adobe applications, and doing so in exchange for a minor CPU bump in the future. But hey, can't argue with the logic of excitement versus that of basic arithmetic, and you asked for opinions.![]()
why do we have to pay £400 for the 1tb flash storage upgrade? Daylight robbery.![]()
Why do we have to pay £400 for the 1TB flash storage upgrade? Daylight robbery.![]()
Right now since apple updated the 15" model with a haswell chipset, I refuse to buy a 2,000 computer on a chipset that is being replaced within the next month.
We say this every time. The next version will be better.... it never ends.
I think getting this model would probably be a mistake as I think the next one will get a chassis redesign, 4K panel and USB Type-C. I also think it'll receive Skylake although that to me isn't important.
My main complaint with the Retinas for the past three years has been the screen. Asus now offer a 15.4" laptop for $1,500 with a 4K IPS panel, 512GB PCIe SSD, 16GB of RAM and a GTX 960m. And of course it comes with 802.11ac and Bluetooth 4.0.
It looks good, it has the hardware features I want but it doesn't have OS X. It's frustrating for me that Apple makes my favorite operating system but has such a limited range of hardware.
Had it received a 4K panel I'd have already ordered one. I need that 1920x1200 desktop and I don't want to use scaling, things look blurry scaled.
1920x1200 looks miniature on a 15 inch display, i see the use for some people but no way this is going to be the standard resolution on a rMBP15.
Thank god.
Time for glasses grandad!![]()
Have you ever tried 1920x1200 on a rMBP15? You cant tell me that its the optimal resolution for that size. I use it on mine from time to time and im glad that the option is available when im working on some project on the go with the internal display, but its just not optimal for daily usage.
I did yes. I owned the 2013 Haswell model on and off over two months. I had to keep exchanging it due to defects.
During that time I ran it 99.9% of the time at the "like 1920x1200" desktop size.
I had zero problem with it at all where size comes in to it. By the way if you look at any 15.6" notebook from any other manufacturer. Asus, Dell whatever. They either come with 1920x1200 displays right out of the gate or a 3.2K-4K panel.
Before this "retina" stuff came about it was pretty standard to get a 1920x1200 resolution notebook from every manufacturer in a £1,000 15" notebook. Unless of course you were buying from Apple.
For me 1920x1200 desktop size is a must but I don't want the non-pixel perfect scaling, I want it to be 4:1 (4 pixels representing 1) like it is on the Dell, Asus and Lenovo 4K panel 15.6" notebooks.
Well then we just have to agree to disagree. And im glad Apple is not playing the numbers game and actually thinks about what is usable for most people. And i believe 1920x1200 on a 15 inch screen is not a good experience outside of rare situations.
We say this every time. The next version will be better.... it never ends.