Exactly right.
I don't need the iGPU Skylake will bring because I'm getting the dGPU model, and I won't honestly notice any nominal ~10% CPU bump that Skylake might bring (or I can just buy that bump by upgrading my processor).
I will notice the (probable) big GPU bump in OpenCL applications from the Radeon. I will notice the much faster SSD interface. I will notice that extra hour of battery life at the end of the day.
I think many people don't need to wait for Skylake. I also don't think waiting for 8 months for an updated laptop is a great tradeoff, especially if you have a very old laptop. Go buy what's available and enjoy it. If you can afford to wait because you've got a modern laptop and don't want to spend the cash, that's fine too.
----------
These new 15's are a waste of everyone's time. So overpriced for what you are getting. I'll wait for Skylake.
The ssd screams and nobody else is even close
An hour more battery life is quite an achievement.
I'll take the faster gpu in a heartbeat.
Force Touch. We have only begun to see what can be done with this.
It's a significant upgrade and the price is the same as always.
Given resale prices I'll sell my 2013 retina MBP and not lose much.
If you don't want one don't buy one but don't assume everyone thinks the same way you do.
----------
Agree with what? His poor description?
He didn't mention the 2.5 faster ssd which is a stunning achievement
Or the 1 hr additional battery life which is also quite an achievement and he says is nearly the same which is just ignorant.
I doubt he knows what force touch is capable of as developers begin to use it for their apps.
Much faster discrete gpu.
Who cares about USB C right now? I care a lot more about the Thunderbolt ports.
There are different opinions. This is one of them:
"The 15-inch Retina MacBook Pro hasnt changed much since my impulse buy in 2012. Today, Apple updated them, but its a very minor update the aging Haswell CPUs are unchanged from last year and barely changed since 2013, held back by Intels Broadwell delays, and the current base model is only 11% faster than the one I bought in 2012. Even todays highest-end CPU is only 24% faster than my 2012 base model. Theres still no USB-C, no LCD improvements since 2012, and nearly the same battery life as last years model.2 They now have Force Touch trackpads, but I consider that a downgrade."
I have to say I agree with it. Personally I am disappointed to see such a minor update, but I can still make sense for some people. In my case, I would love to see a bigger update to justify the purchase. Just personal opinion.
I talked to a couple of friends that have been on the fence and they are thinking the same way.
----------
State your source for a faster chip being out in a month.
I've been on the fence of what to replace my 2012 rMBP. I have a few choices in front of me.
A new rMBP, iMac or a PC.
Right now since apple updated the 15" model with a haswell chipset, I refuse to buy a 2,000 computer on a chipset that is being replaced within the next month. I'm very disappointed with this move, so I either hold off until the fall or next year for skylake if I want a new MBP.
Similarly the iMac is in the same boat. Do I spend more money on a comptuer that I really ought too on an what is turning out to be an obsolete chipset. I love the screen of the iMac, but I think given the high cost, it doesn't make sense for me to buy.
PC - I have a SP3 so I suppose I could make the jump with an AIO computer that is a fraction of the iMac. When the summer rolls around, I'll revisit this decision.
----------
It has the latest trackpad.
The Mac Book keyboard is a compromise because of the size of the laptop.
It does have the latest screen
The latest shell? Meaning what? It's already as thin as possible with a quad core proc.
2008 is old.
I was expecting an entirely new MBP this year. After seeing the new design and technology of the new Macbook, I was expected all of this technology, and more, in a new MBP. It should have the latest screen, the latest keyboard, the latest trackpad, the latest shell, and Skylake. I really think Apple stumbled on this one - they should have created an entirely new MBP based on the new Macbook - and then released it later this year.
I'll continue to wait - I still use my 2008 MBP.
----------
1920 X 1200 sucks on any 15 inch laptop.
Have you ever tried 1920x1200 on a rMBP15? You cant tell me that its the optimal resolution for that size. I use it on mine from time to time and im glad that the option is available when im working on some project on the go with the internal display, but its just not optimal for daily usage.