Creepy
I know it's inevitable that technology would get to this level, but it's still really creepy.
I know it's inevitable that technology would get to this level, but it's still really creepy.
...DO NO EVIL! ...
This Skybox may help mapping progress, however, it holds so much more potential for privacy loss... Not sure I like the thought of how it *MIGHT* be used.
And you don't think that the US Government/Military can already do this to watch whatever they want just about anywhere on the planet?
This is scary, in the wrong hands.
I see a huge market for decoy trucks, decoy shipping containers,
decoy money transport, decoy whatever is about to 'blow up'.
Scary stuff.
Image
The step after that is real-time satellite mapping.
That's me. Waving to myself.
This is awesome. In 10 years, when someone burglarizes my home, police will be able to pull up Skybox surveillance and track the perp and my belongings. The future of crime fighting/ deterrence.
I see a huge market for decoy trucks, decoy shipping containers,
decoy money transport, decoy whatever is about to 'blow up'.
Scary stuff.
Image
"We've noticed you're driving to Best Buy. Here are some coupons you can use, all tagged with specials codes so we can see what you bought to improve your future recommendations."
This is awesome. In 10 years, when someone burglarizes my home, police will be able to pull up Skybox surveillance and track the perp and my belongings. The future of crime fighting/ deterrence.
I don't see how this is a big deal. Digital Globe has been able to do the same for years http://www.digitalglobe.com/ and can do it at higher resolution and is now adding infrared imaging.
The only thing special about Skybox is that they are located in Silicon Valley near both Apple and Google. Though they do plan on have more less capable satellites in the sky.
Google continues to prove they are nothing more than the NSA's lap dog....
Google sucks. Can't stand the company, there products, or there sub-contracted products.
This is all of the 80's sci fi films rolled into one!
Just saying, but a satellite that can take pictures at high enough resolution to identify people and number plates would have to be very big. For example, using the diffraction equation, assuming satellite altitude of 100 km, light wavelength of 550 nm, and a required resolution of 10 mm, we get a required aperture size of around 7 metres. And as pictures of the tops of people's heads, and the roofs of cars aren't all that useful, to view things at a useful angle, it would need to be more on the order of 15-20 m. And that's just the camera lens.
It is not possible to see small things (like people's faces) from a large distance with a small camera.
Detecting a car from space would only require a camera lens on the order of 10-20 cm.
That said, I wonder what the penalty would be for shooting down these satellites? It is certainly something a reasonably wealthy country could do if they got sick of being spied on.