It certainly looks like Apple didn't test this much outside their own environment. I'm sure their campus is well covered, and Skynet has a map of San Francisco hotspots. I'm sure it worked great in testing...
That'll only work to the extent that there is overlap among access points-- urban environments. Get out to the 'burbs where houses are a bowshot apart and you'll never be able to reference one signal to another-- and if you could you'd only have two at best and not know which one is right.I believe that one of the features of this service is database updates from results of location queries. I'm guessing that this is part of their model - once they have a decent starting point, users will keep the data fresh merely by using the service.
Ridiculous in the sense of "how can you even apply the word accuracy to that?" Yeah, about. The term "exact location" is rather absurd. WiFi positioning can get you about 25-50m accuracy on a really, really good day.with people having problems reading access points from people known to have moved and sending your location read miles from where you actually are, i have a question for people living in cities with municipally owned wifi networks. for example, the city of Chaska, MN has wifi spread out throughout the city. is the locate me feature in a city such as Chaska just ridiculously accurate?
Ok, who's with me on this?: Let's pick a small community in like Connecticut and magically relocate it to Area 51.Wouldn't it make more sense for them to put a form on their site where you can submit your APs without manually writing an email?![]()