Intel's LGA2011 workstation platform lacks an integrated IGP to work with on the processor. I have discussed it over the years with Aidenshaw and others about other solutions by sharing video card resources and bandwidth or a "data-only" version of Thunderbolt. The video component always ends up being the requirement that kills it on the Mac Pro.Yeah, have a CalDigit PCIe USB 3.0 card. No Thunderbolt? Wow. That would floor me. I know quite a few in film and other professions who could use Thunderbolt connections for displays and external HDD's, etc. If Apple releases a new top line system as the only Mac without Thunderbolt, well, I'll be speechless.
Apple already rides the edge when it comes to thermals. I can imagine anything with a quad core currently just being replaced with the next available SKU at said price point under the Haswell line. It gets murky when it comes to the 13" models.The models I've seen are the following:
Core i7-4930MX (57W)
Core i7-4900MQ (47W)
Core i7-4800MQ (47W)
Core i7-4702MQ (37W)
Core i7-4702HQ (37W)
Core i7-4700MQ (47W)
Core i7-4700HQ (47W)
They are all quad-core, and their TDP range from 37W to 57W. All these models are equipped with HD 4600 (GT2) and not with GT3 (Iris), which will bring the most significant boost to graphics power. My question is: will Apple put these processors, even being quad-core and equipped with GT2, inside the upcoming 13" and 15" rMBP so they get released next week during WWDC? Or is there something else Intel will launch this week?
I will be hoping for updates next week. My laptop really needs to be replaced. As much as I hate to buy a Mac.