You lost me once you said "Analyst".
First of all, this guy has a really good track record. Secondly, WWDC is just over a week away, which means it's much easier to make well informed guesses.
You lost me once you said "Analyst".
I think the non-retina MBP will continue - even the base cMBP has a 500 gb drive at $1199, and to match that in Retina you would pay $1999 or so.
I would love to get a retina but I really need the 500 gb drive since a new rMBP would slowly replace my aging 2008 iMac 24".
- Both rMBP and MBA lines will be upgraded at WWDC. I have some doubt on that, but everybody seems to take it for granted that Apple will update these two lines of laptops. I'm still not convinced on the availability of specific Haswell processors which are due for each of these laptops, but people (including Kuo) seem to simply ignore this issue, as if all Haswell processors would be readily available the day after Intel launches them. I hope I am wrong and everybody else is right. Let's see..
I understand. Personally I'd rather see the form factor of the Retina MBP stay the same and see a bigger battery put in it. But Apple seems to value thinness over such function, as evident by the iPhone 5.Not saying the retina display isn't nice just that I would rather have 15 hours of battery life than retina and 10 hours
I hope for the good of sales point for apple..they get at least 1080p resolution for Macbook Air and let the Pros have the retina. Or the only model who will make sense will be the 11" for his portability because the 13" air is almost the same with the retina but retina has too much over the air. Last year the Air still got his portability and the better screen than the 13 pro
I'm still rocking my early-2011 15" QCi7 MBP because the 15" retinas don't offer a compelling reason to upgrade. The 13" MBPs - retina or classic - sacrifice too much raw processing power.
I realize I'm a distinct minority ... I keep my MBP tethered to a Thunderbolt display. Except on those rare occasions when it leaves my desk, a retina display isn't of much use to me.
What I would buy - in a heartbeat! - would be a sort of "super-pro" 13" rMBP with a QC i7 processor and discrete graphics capability. I could then replace my 2011 MBP and my 11" MBA, which I use for travel.
I remember years ago when new hardware was something to lust after. As Apple's focus continues to shift to iOS, I imagine lust-worthy hardware upgrades will be few and far between.
13" MBA: Flash storage, i5/i7 processor, Intel HD 4000, 7 hour battery
13" rMBP: Flash storage, i5/i7 processor, Intel HD 4000, 7 hour battery
Aside from small differences in processor clock speeds and the retina display, they are essentially the same laptop.
2x the RAM
13" MBA: Flash storage, i5/i7 processor, Intel HD 4000, 7 hour battery
13" rMBP: Flash storage, i5/i7 processor, Intel HD 4000, 7 hour battery
Aside from small differences in processor clock speeds and the retina display, they are essentially the same laptop.
Even with a slimmer design? WTF? How could the public ignore such innovation?
I don't understand the dislike for the retina display. I personally think it's gorgeous and worth a few extra bucks. And after looking at it, I can't ever see myself going back to a non-retina screen.![]()
IIRC the same thing happened on the Sandy Bridge launch, apple actually gets ahead of everybody; shipping 2011 macbook pros even before the official release date. so i guess it COULD happened on the Haswell.
Apple has left the cMBP case exactly the same since 2008.
When did that happen?
Sandy Bridge was released in January 2011, and MBPs were released in February, about one month after.
Haswell is out? Got this email from newegg today.
http://www.newegg.com/LimitedTimeOf...INTELNEW060213-_-EMC-060213-Index-_-E0A-_-CPU