If the voice navigation works really well then that might also compensate for a smaller device. More of a phone and less of a pocket computer.
Voice based navigation?
How is that going to work with a lot of background noise outside?
Voice navigation Shuffle-style: press and hold the button 3 times in a row, and the voice will read out the possible things you can do. Press it again to do the thing it says.
I don't know about you guys, but while voice navigation sounds cool, I would never really use it. I feel stupid saying commands to a phone, and especially when I have to repeat them 5 times for it to get it right. Then of course by that time you could just have done it with your hands.
But the rest sounds good, if this is really true, they are probably making the device much smaller, but only making the screen slightly smaller. And since the screen already touches the edges as much as possible on the sides, they are probably going to cut off the top and bottom (speaker and home button part) of the phone. That's something I think they should do with the normal-sized iPhone as well, if they can. Well, I'm sure they will do it as soon as it is technically possible!
I would think this was make it really hard to hold onto without accidentally pressing something on the screen. I have a hard enough time holding onto my current iPhone without touching the screen in the wrong place, and because of this it slips out of my hands sometimes!
That's a lot of rumors over the weekend!
Do they really want to go the way of the failure that is the latest iPod Nano?
WeegieMac said:To those who want a larger screen.
I had a go of an HTC Desire HD on Friday after a work colleague got one.
And, sorry, it's too big. Even the guy who owned it said, "Taking it in/out your pocket is like wielding a brick at times".
It almost reminded me of the days I walked around with the original N-Gage at my ear while Nokia's were getting smaller and smaller.
The Desire HD looks more like a mini-tablet than a large phone.
Even then, it's not the resolution that's the point. The interface and apps are designed for a 3.5" display. Any smaller and they wouldn't work properly. Buttons would be too small to press etc., meaning that the current apps in the App Store wouldn't be compatible.
If this phone really does get released, I'm guessing it'll run iOS in a similar way to how the iPod nano currently does (its own few apps and no access to the App Store).
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148 Safari/6533.18.5)
Exactly.
Apple knows it's users, of which many are women and anemic males who do not want such an ugly bulge on their starvation achieved bodies.
Also, such a large phone would not easily fit in the hands of females, which are key to the iPhones success.
assuming the screen is only slightly smaller (25-30%) and exactly half the resolution of the current iPhone 4, there would be no reason Apple couldn't make it immediately capable of running half resolution versions of all current apps and then allow developers to slowly update their apps to be more compatible over time
that is exactly what they did with iPad only initially doubling resolution until individual app compatibility was implemented by developers
and you are out of your mind if you think Apple would release a phone (or any mobile computing device) that is not in the iTunes/app store ecosystem
To those who want a larger screen.
I had a go of an HTC Desire HD on Friday after a work colleague got one.
And, sorry, it's too big. Even the guy who owned it said, "Taking it in/out your pocket is like wielding a brick at times".
It almost reminded me of the days I walked around with the original N-Gage at my ear while Nokia's were getting smaller and smaller.
The Desire HD looks more like a mini-tablet than a large phone.
The cheaper phone doesn't have to include a retina display. The shrink could be anywhere between 0 and 30%. I'm sure that a $200 or $300 price point, enough people won't really care about the point you're making. There's a price/usability middle ground somewhere.Can you imagine the current on-screen buttons 25-30% smaller? Clearly you didn't read my post properly. Resolution isn't the issue, the physical size is. Making the current apps any smaller would make them near impossible to use.
Exactly.
Apple knows it's users, of which many are women and anemic males who do not want such an ugly bulge on their starvation achieved bodies.
Also, such a large phone would not easily fit in the hands of females, which are key to the iPhones success.
The latest iPod Nano was a fail for so many reasons, the biggest being the exact same price as the last one but with the same memory and LESS function. Ridiculously stupid.
An iPhonano would be excellent if it cut some utility, was half size, and was half price. I'd be interested in that if it was still a good mp3+info holding device sans video. I'm not a texter, though, unlike most people.
You need the bezel to hold the phone without touching the display, much like how the iPad has a thick bezel around its display.
.Shine said:So if i have this right, then in the next few months we'll be seeing..
iPad 2
MacBook Pro refresh
iPhone 5 (or iPhone 4GS or whatever it'll be called)
iPhone Nano (with edge to edge screen) (or whatever it'll be called)
iOS 5
Mac OS X 10.7
Free MobileMe
iTunes air sync
wow..this is amazing.
I really like the idea of a smaller phone, but i think "half-size" is cutting it too small, but we'll see. This is gonna be a huge blow to Android, as Apple will now be competing against the amount of iPhones in the market with the iPhone Nano, along with the specs of the Android devices as well with the iPhone 5.
Both possibly running a polished iOS 5.
And for all of us with Macs, we'll be seeing Lion be released, and maybe iOS 5 and Lion will have some sort of syncing ability or something. Their releases seem pretty close by.