Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Reported the terrible HDR processing via Apple Feedback (FB9745119). Photos taken in JPG/HEIC via iPhone 13 Pro Max with iOS 15.1. Not edited.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1257.JPG
    IMG_1257.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 742
  • IMG_0702.JPG
    IMG_0702.JPG
    880.6 KB · Views: 717
  • tempImageNtBa4V.png
    tempImageNtBa4V.png
    4.2 MB · Views: 757
  • tempImage4PA4IU.png
    tempImage4PA4IU.png
    4.7 MB · Views: 726
  • IMG_0699.JPG
    IMG_0699.JPG
    954.3 KB · Views: 655
  • IMG_1195.JPG
    IMG_1195.JPG
    577.2 KB · Views: 662
  • Like
Reactions: EmperorTim
Reported the terrible HDR processing via Apple Feedback (FB9745119). Photos taken in JPG/HEIC via iPhone 13 Pro Max with iOS 15.1. Not edited.
Have you tried opening the editing window to see how they look? It won’t fix the smudging, but it should show the dynamic range properly. I just change the black point to -1 as a negligible edit so it will be able to be “saved” showing the proper dynamic range.
 
Have you tried opening the editing window to see how they look? It won’t fix the smudging, but it should show the dynamic range properly. I just change the black point to -1 as a negligible edit so it will be able to be “saved” showing the proper dynamic range.
No help in any of the posted photos.
 
Reported the terrible HDR processing via Apple Feedback (FB9745119). Photos taken in JPG/HEIC via iPhone 13 Pro Max with iOS 15.1. Not edited.
Exactly what I've been saying, HDR is ****ing horrible. Blown out highlights, crushed shadows and over sharpened to the max.

Who in their right mind thinks the 13 Pro takes good photos?
 
  • Like
Reactions: xrayv and Guacamole
Exactly what I've been saying, HDR is ****ing horrible. Blown out highlights, crushed shadows and over sharpened to the max.

Who in their right mind thinks the 13 Pro takes good photos?

Depends on the shots you’re taking

Portrait mode you could say it’s the best from any phone out there. Photos of kids, pets are very good. Dark lighting the blacks are crushed and HDR is an issue but for a large amount of photos it is a very good camera but needs an update on the areas it’s lacking
 
Depends on the shots you’re taking

Portrait mode you could say it’s the best from any phone out there. Photos of kids, pets are very good. Dark lighting the blacks are crushed and HDR is an issue but for a large amount of photos it is a very good camera but needs an update on the areas it’s lacking
I don’t know man, I’d say 60% of the time the photos come out with blown highlights, crushed shadows and too much sharpness. I think it’s a combination of how photos are being processed with Smart HDR 4, how they are being displayed via the Photos app and how Apple has calibrated the displays.
 
Has anyone tried iOS 15.2 beta? Is it better at processing the photos?
I was on 15.2 B1 and now in B2 (just came out today) and I don’t know if it’s just placebo effect but it feels like there’s less sharpening going on after a photo is taken. I’ll continue to test this out.
 
I came here hoping that the iPhone began to shoot better since the iphone 5. I then switched to Xiaomi Mi 8 pro and was amazed at the pictures of the google camera. Apple is still very far from Google in photo processing. I will wait for the appearance of at least the HDR switch.
13ProMax 15.1
 
Yeah ... Auto HDR sucks. I frequently use ProCamera, which still has an HDR toggle. But keep complaining, and maybe OS 18 will fix it.
 
Yeah ... Auto HDR sucks. I frequently use ProCamera, which still has an HDR toggle. But keep complaining, and maybe OS 18 will fix it.
Can you show a couple of pictures taken with this app? For example a window in a room or something similar.
ProCamera. By Cocologics, right?
P.S. What's the point of using other apps if they use the camera API? They do not improve or enhance the quality of the photograph in any way. All of these apps are just candy wrappers for the standard camera. 🤔
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Paninnguaq
The stock camera is also so seamless when shooting proraw. With something like Lightroom there’s the extra headache of having to export the photos because for some reason they don’t automatically save them to the camera roll. With Halide, the raw pics are so dark and unprocessed. All the raw photos from halide need processing. As much as I’d like to LARP as a serious photographer, the truth is that people buy iPhones to snap photos and forget about extra steps. I like to live in the moment and not have to think excessively about capturing memories. Halide just creates extra work. It doesn’t even have night mode. I’d take the softer and brighter night photos from the stock app over the dark and grainy Halide pics any day (or rather night, lol).
 
The stock camera is also so seamless when shooting proraw. With something like Lightroom there’s the extra headache of having to export the photos because for some reason they don’t automatically save them to the camera roll. With Halide, the raw pics are so dark and unprocessed. All the raw photos from halide need processing. As much as I’d like to LARP as a serious photographer, the truth is that people buy iPhones to snap photos and forget about extra steps. I like to live in the moment and not have to think excessively about capturing memories. Halide just creates extra work. It doesn’t even have night mode. I’d take the softer and brighter night photos from the stock app over the dark and grainy Halide pics any day (or rather night, lol).
I'm with you on convenience and ease being one of the main benefits of the iPhone. I'm not too worried about paying a bit more for extra file storage, so I just tap on "ProRaw" in any situation where there's a lot of dynamic range and I think the built-in HDR will struggle. So far, that's worked out well for me.

I also quite like ProCamera and find its controls to be intuitive and easy to use. HDR seems to work better with it on the iPhone 13.

I'm pretty sure Apple will fix this. In the meantime, there are a lot of other options.
 
I'm with you on convenience and ease being one of the main benefits of the iPhone. I'm not too worried about paying a bit more for extra file storage, so I just tap on "ProRaw" in any situation where there's a lot of dynamic range and I think the built-in HDR will struggle. So far, that's worked out well for me.

I also quite like ProCamera and find its controls to be intuitive and easy to use. HDR seems to work better with it on the iPhone 13.

I'm pretty sure Apple will fix this. In the meantime, there are a lot of other options.
Show me pl HDR shots taken with an iPhone camera and ProCamera. I want to buy an application, but I understand what they charge for.
 
Here are 3 shots for you to compare. I've included downloads below, then screenshots of each file in order:
ProRaw:
ProRaw Screenshot.png


iPhone 13 HEIC
iPhone 13 Screenshot.png


ProCamera HDR "Natural"
ProCamera HDR Natural Screenshot.png


No edits or changes were made to the files.

To my eye, ProCamera HDR is much better than the iPhone processing, but ProRaw is significantly better than both. I opened the file in Lightroom, and all of the shadow and highlight data are preserved. Here's a version with a few simple edits (boosting shadows and whites, reducing blacks, adding a simple contrast point curve, about +5 of clarity):

Processed ProRaw file
ProRaw Processed.jpg


For now, I'm shooting in ProRaw almost exclusively. It will eat up my file storage, but at least I'll have photos that I like until Apple fixes this.
 
I have noticed (iphone 13 mini here) that doing countdown shots (3 or 10 seconds) never triggers the smarthdr "feature".

But then you gain a lot of noise and lose detail because in burst mode they bump up the ISO and take 10 shots in fast succession.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.