Awesome! Sounds promising! I'll give it a shot when I get home later tonight and post back. Thanks so much.
omg it works perfectly now! I think I can finally start enjoying this macbook
Awesome! Sounds promising! I'll give it a shot when I get home later tonight and post back. Thanks so much.
It's not the fact that the MB's screen is inferior to the Pro that really grates me. That was to be expected. It's that it's visibly inferior to that of the Air. Why, Apple, Why? The screens are the exact same size, same resolution, LED, and the air came out close to a year ago. Why couldn't they have at least kep that quality, instead of intentionally crippling it and putting in an inferior display? It's absolutely ridiculous, and a massive disappointment from Apple. I had no doubt I was going to purchase this before comments about the display started sprouting up from reviews, and its really turned me off. Its not just the issue itself, but the rationalization that Apple must have made to come to this decision. It's just utterly insulting, and extremely frugal, especially for a $1400 laptop.
Increasing the contrast from the Universal Access seems to mitigate the problems of this screen substantially.
Increasing the contrast from the Universal Access seems to mitigate the problems of this screen substantially.
shadow details in B&W photos disappear when you do this.
I watch Apple Insiders RSS Feed and the following article popped up:
"MacBook buyers sound off against questionable screen quality
from *AppleInsider* | *Apple Insider* News and Analysis
For all its structural and performance improvements, the new MacBook and Apple are facing sharp criticism from some owners and would-be buyers who say the LCD appears to have a blue tint and doesn't solve some problems with earlier generation designs."
http://www.appleinsider.com/article..._off_against_questionable_screen_quality.html
When I tried to access the article it seems to be empty...anyone else notice this? Maybe the article will be up in a few days.
I just wanted to ask, this screen is better than the previous gen Macbook? I don't care how it compares to the Air or Pro, that isn't relevant to me. If it was worse than the previous gen then i'd have a hard time justifying buying one, however it sounds like it's better.
Honestly I've never had a problem with my Blackbook screen, I don't understand all this screen nazi-ism. Also you can't blame Apple for trying to make a profit, blame the corrupt economy. Honestly I'm getting tired of people blaming companies for not giving you the absolute best product they can give. What do they have to gain from that? Nothing.
I just wanted to ask, this screen is better than the previous gen Macbook? I don't care how it compares to the Air or Pro, that isn't relevant to me. If it was worse than the previous gen then i'd have a hard time justifying buying one, however it sounds like it's better.
Honestly I've never had a problem with my Blackbook screen, I don't understand all this screen nazi-ism. Also you can't blame Apple for trying to make a profit, blame the corrupt economy. Honestly I'm getting tired of people blaming companies for not giving you the absolute best product they can give. What do they have to gain from that? Nothing.
The alumiMB screen is better in brightness than the previous generation - no doubt. Out of the box it has very cold blue cast about it that I found difficult to calibrate out. There is an icc profile posted here that tremendously helps that issue.
Issue 1 pretty much solved.
Okay, now issue 2 - the blacks can be washed out and are not consistent from top to bottom. There is an extremely small viewing angle where it almost works but you have to constantly adjust the display if you move or move the computer in the least. A little too much back angle and blacks go "negative" and a little too much forward there are no blacks. You almost have to tilt the screen a little towards you from 45º. This isn't apparent as much until you go to a dark web page or watch a video. Things I'm sure no one with a new MB would ever do, right.
So, even though the previous generations display may not have been as bright or LCD backlit, it had a more useable display. I never had a problem with old MB displays. They were okay but not great. I think you have to actually have the new one in your lap for a week or so to appreciate how craptatstic they actually are.
Thank you for that review, it's a lot more helpful than "the Air's is better".
Jessica, I was pleased until i saw that last photo, thats from a normal viewing angle? Kinda scary, its making me lean towards a MBP...
no he owns a new macbook probably and wants it so desperately to be as good as the screen on the air and pro.. it is a stupid argument to make. it is a lot worse.
The macbooks screen is getting bashed too much to the point where people saying the Air's screen is bounds and leaps better where you just cant have the macbooks screen.
I had the Air, sold it for the Macbook due to the many issues I had with the Air.
Again, I did not deny the Air's screen isnt better nor the Pros. The macbooks screen is getting bashed too much to the point where people saying the Air's screen is bounds and leaps better where you just cant have the macbooks screen.
for your average needs, the average consumer (who outside of here will buy this machine) will not be affected by the screen.
I seriously wanted this MB to replace my Air for travel. I knew the screen wouldn't be as good as the MBA/MBP but assumed it couldn't be worse than the last gen. MB. - WRONG. It is.
The average consumer wouldn't want to use that DVD drive to watch a DVD then? Seriously, the screen can't handle a dark scene without adjusting constantly and never even top to bottom. It's a black thing and viewing angle issue. You think it's just people here - follow this link my friend:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1757089&tstart=0
I'm not going to argue the angle issue as that has been stated many times but the angle issue doesnt bother me to the point where I do not like the machine. As for the previous gen screen, no way that is good as this one. My main reason to get the Air and Pro last year were for the LED screen since the previous gen macbook was so washed and dull.
I'm not going to argue the angle issue as that has been stated many times but the angle issue doesnt bother me to the point where I do not like the machine. As for the previous gen screen, no way that is good as this one. My main reason to get the Air and Pro last year were for the LED screen since the previous gen macbook was so washed and dull.
You will like it if you don't watch movies. Try and watch the cave scenes in Iron Man and see anything. Well, you can adjust it back to see the top - oh, then adjust it forward to see the bottom. Come on - it's plain unacceptable. I know you want so hard to love it but I'm just speakin' the truth.
So you do actually own one? What model screen do you have if I may ask?
True, I do not watch movies. I haven't even put in a disc in the drive and have little use for it (hence why the Air was perfect for me if not for the heat and core shutdowns with basic tasks). I have the 2.4 for the backlit keyboard.
Then you'll be fine. The newer Airs I'm sure will run cooler and many of the issues from first rev sorted out.
I ran out of disk space on my Air and while traveling, it'd be nice to pop in a DVD. So what the heck, I bought the new MB. As I said, the issues are the unobtainable uniform black level from top to bottom given any angle. As long as you're not full screen or using mostly white backgrounds, it's adequate - with a different display calibration to compensate for cold screen tone.
I think there are a lot more people who will watch a movie on their MB than not and it's a good thing to know before they purchase it.