Gav2k
macrumors G3
It was probably a logistics mistake - AppleCare don't replace macs with refurbished ones (if you need a replacement, it's always new).
Not on discontinued products
It was probably a logistics mistake - AppleCare don't replace macs with refurbished ones (if you need a replacement, it's always new).
Technically there was no screw up it's stated on the paperwork you may receive a referb it's just unfortunate the op received a less than perfect specimen.
That is pretty cool actually, and I think this post is making AppleCare look more appealing.
The screw up was missing the fact that the machine had aftermarket upgrades. I also would be quite puzzled if I send in a computer with 1TB SSD and get a stock HDD one back![]()
I looked at the paperwork that was sent with the computer - It stated that the machine failed to boot with my SSD hard drive and my 16GB of RAM. Not believing this for one second I installed my SSD and my RAM and the machine booted right up. Apple returned the laptop with what originally came it it; a 500GB 5400RPM HD and 4GB RAM... This led me to the conclusion that Apple merely swapped my computer with a refurb thinking that was okay... Hardly.
- This doesn't appear to have anything to do with the extended AppleCare coverage one can purchase. From what I can see the machine in question is too old to fall under any AppleCare coverage.
Its GPU issues were covered under Apple's extended repair programme.
I am blown away that you could possibly be upset at the slightest.
Even if you would have gotten your 2011 model back, the wear and tear it has experienced from 3 years of use means you couldn't expect a whole lot of longevity in the coming years.
For example, lithium batteries that come in the MacBooks are only expected to last about 1000 charge cycles. Considering your 17" started at around a 5 hour battery life, you probably had around 700-1000 charge cycles already and were probably getting just a couple hours of battery life per charge anyway.
All the other parts on your 17" had hundreds of hours of use too. The other parts could have gone at any moment.
Now you have a brand new top of the line 15" model with zero charge cycles, brand new everything. Battery life of 8 hours, 22nm architecture with quiet running asymmetrical fans, better graphics etc.
You know the saying don't look a gift horse in the mouth? Well in this case its like Santa Claus showed up at your house with a big present and personally delivered it to you, then you gave him the stink eye for not giving you 2 presents!
I thought the same initially, until I noticed this:
So, they actually aren't "out" the 1TB SSD and 16GB RAM. Those were apparently removed before it was sent in for service (as the phrase "I installed my ..." would seem to imply, at any rate.)
If that had happened to me, I would be happy, and I certainly would have never expected to get a brand new, top-spec system as a result. Being upset about getting that as a resolution? Why? That's something I don't think I will ever understand, TBH ... no matter what the justification is.
OP might have reason to be mildly annoyed that he's losing his 17 inch MBP. But even if, somehow, they managed to find his original 17 inch MBP, in exactly the same condition, and managed to fix it, I would still choose the brand new top of the line 15" MBPr any day.
Maybe I wasn't clear - I had a Samsung 1TB SSD and 16GB of Crucial RAM in the machine running for years. I did NOT remove these when I sent the machine in. When I got the replacement 17" back my SSD and 16GB RAM were included in the box with the computer but were not installed in the machine
Thanks for clarifying. So, in the end, you were not "out" your 1TB SSD and 16GB RAM, since they sent them back with the replacement unit.
FWIW, getting back a refurb unit that was not in same or better condition would certainly suck bigtime, and I would have complained too. I just don't understand getting upset after they have done probably the most they could do given the circumstances, that's all. In the end, I think it's due to us merely having different attitudes regarding our devices, which is not that big of a deal in the grand scheme.
To be clear - I'm think apple handled the screw up in the best possible way, make no mistake there. I am just not sure that the new machine suits my needs (right now) as much as my 17" is all.
They screwed up, tired to sort it with another 17", you found out, they went one better and gave you a top spec retina. From my experience NO other company would have handled the situation as 'well' as this.
Accidents happen, in my opinion you benefitted from the mistake, big time !
Enjoy your new machine! 8)
Only on MacRumors someone would complain about receiving a brand new, top of the line $3200 laptop which is the most powerful Apple have in production.
Well I can understand the frustration but if I was offered a maxed out computer, even if I didn't want it I'd see that as an opportunity to make a LOT of quick cash.
I'd leave the new one sealed and sell it. Then I'd take that money and buy a spotless 2011 17" again.
You'd probably come out $1000 ahead if not more.
I can actually understand both the OP's point of view as well as the majority of respondents to this thread who don't understand what the big deal is.
OP clearly valued the physically larger, anti-glare screen above and beyond any of the benefits he would currently get from a newer model, whether that be the (glossy) high-DPI screen or the higher performance of all components (OP keeps saying the only upgrade he got in the new machine was the CPU because the RAM and HDD capacity were matched to his aftermarket upgrades, but you have to look past capacity: the fact is if he bothered to benchmark RAM and PCIe flash performance and compare them to his old 17" model, the new machine would SMOKE the old in terms of performance, and that's *completely* leaving aside the CPU...the current PCIe flash drives are AMAZING). So because he doesn't value those "upgrades", in his mind, the new machine is not really an upgrade for him. It's just, from this perspective, the next-best thing (other than finding and returning his original machine to him) Apple could've done to make things right.
I personally disagree, but that's because what I value in a portable computer is clearly different than what OP values. When Apple announced the first 15" Retina MBP, I ordered it sight-unseen because I wanted that display. I also loathe bulky 17" notebooks...15" is the absolute biggest I'd ever want to go, and if I had to be honest with myself, if I could get my 15" rMBP configuration (including quad-core i7 and dGPU) in a 13" model, I would probably prefer to go even smaller.
I guess the part that baffles me about this whole story is, why didn't Apple depot service simply replace the logic board in his original machine? Why do a chassis swap? If I had taken pristine care of my machine, and sent it in for service expecting them to replace only the defective part, I would be mad, too, especially if the display was not the defective part that the machine was sent in for service over and a worse specimen was sent back to me.
I suspect that the moral of this story is that if you are particular about your computer, and don't want to run the risk that Apple will swap components on your machine (or the entire machine) other than the one that needs servicing, then insist that your local Apple store order the parts and perform the repair in-house rather than send it to the depot, even if depot repair jobs are supposedly "faster".
-- Nathan