Mac is not a serious platform for computing. Never has been. It’s always been a toy. Nobody uses a Mac for real work. That’s why they are more excited about releasing an underpowered Neo than a real PC.This is pretty disgusting if you ask me, but perhaps not surprising. This company has never believed in making a desktop workstation accessible to many people. Shameful
It existed as a serious product line for 6 years. It’s been a joke since 2013.😢😭😭😢😭😭😢😭😭 SAY IT AIN'T SO😢😭😭😢😭😭😢😭😭
Lou
Apple Silicon isn’t as capable as Intel. And now Intel has matched it for performance per watt. PCs run circles around MacBooks for battery life and have better performance to boot. Steve Jobs would never have abandoned Intel or the Mac Pro. But at least Apple has a $600 toy with 8GB RAM for professionals.^^^^Nope - the 2019 7,1 Mac Pro was the pinnacle. And YES - The 2013 trash can was indeed a JOKE👎
Lou
^^^^Nope - the 2019 7,1 Mac Pro was the pinnacle. And YES - The 2013 trash can was indeed a JOKE👎
In the US - The Base 2010 Mac Pro with dual processors was $4,999 list. The Base 2019 Mac Pro was $5,999 list.Mind you back in 2010, a quad-core 3.2ghz Mac Pro with Radeon 5870 1GB, 8GB RAM, 1TB spinning HDD and a 27" LED Cinema Display was AUD$6000. I still have the invoice for the one I purchased brand new back then.
I did my entire PhD (and continuing postdoc) research on it. 4 publications, 13 conference abstracts, and 1 lead inventor patent. I guess that doesn’t count as real work.Mac is not a serious platform for computing. Never has been. It’s always been a toy. Nobody uses a Mac for real work. That’s why they are more excited about releasing an underpowered Neo than a real PC.
To me the best part of the Mac Pro was the very knowledgeable community it spawned here.
I mean I'd argue and say it existed since the Powermac G3. Name change was only that.It existed as a serious product line for 6 years. It’s been a joke since 2013.
Mac is not a serious platform for computing. Never has been. It’s always been a toy. Nobody uses a Mac for real work. That’s why they are more excited about releasing an underpowered Neo than a real PC.
Apple Silicon isn’t as capable as Intel. And now Intel has matched it for performance per watt. PCs run circles around MacBooks for battery life and have better performance to boot. Steve Jobs would never have abandoned Intel or the Mac Pro. But at least Apple has a $600 toy with 8GB RAM for professionals.
This is pretty disgusting if you ask me, but perhaps not surprising. This company has never believed in making a desktop workstation accessible to many people. Shameful
Thunderbolt is most definitely NOT fine for expansion, especially for GPUs. I guess when apple says its fine to have 1000 wires coming out of your computer, people will believe its fine, until they tell them it's not fine again.What do you actually want them to do? The M5 Max and future M5 Ultra is far more capable than anything that's gone in any Mac Pro. Thunderbolt is fine for expansion.
Sounds like you're attached to the form factor, but that form factor is no longer necessary.
Thunderbolt is most definitely NOT fine for expansion
especially for GPUs. I guess when apple says its fine to have 1000 wires coming out of your computer, people will believe its fine, until they tell them it's not fine again.
M5 max/ultra/super special mega/whatever are not far more capable than anything thats in a Mac Pro because they can't use CUDA so a person who works in ML/HPC/scientific computing will not use it.
What is viable apparently is selling 1500 dollar phones for teenagers to scroll tiktok and celebrating the release of a repulsive netbook.
Apple has never supported CUDA, that's got nothing to do with killing the Mac Pro. I'd rather Apple compete to offer a viable alternative to CUDA - screw NVIDIA.
You must be new here. CUDA was supported when NVIDIA drivers were available on the 2006-2010 MPs. I used it extensively back then with programs that supported it (Premiere Pro for one). It had better performance than OpenCL.