Couldn't agree more. Apple has to take the next step and release the next big thing that makes us wonder how no one has thought of that before.In my humble opinion the technology in this arena has started to peak
Couldn't agree more. Apple has to take the next step and release the next big thing that makes us wonder how no one has thought of that before.In my humble opinion the technology in this arena has started to peak
Actually, this business decision makes 100% sense. Updating the ipad after the holidays was always silly. Not to mention, it resulted in people returning their iPads and waiting it out for the upgrade in 3 months.
Whereas, an update before the holidays allows people to buy the latest and greatest as a gift, and use it all year too.
Here's my take.
1) Apple wanted to get as many products on to the Lightning connector as fast as possible so people we no longer buying 30-pin accessories for their newly purchased iPads yet having to buy something else for their new iPhones. This is key, I think, for giving the new connector needed momentum. Clean break from old to new across product lines (old 4th gen. iPod touch and iPad 2 notwithstanding, which I suspect are being made still to target enterprise demographics mainly. These products are barely advertised on Apple's website).
2) Make use of their expensive new A6 architecture as quickly as possible in the iPad to keep it competitive with all the quad-core processors coming out in Android devices (and while Apple tends not to play the out-spec game, the A6 is a very fast chip, faster than many of the quad-core Android devices).
3) Similar to above, they can keep the iPod touch, iPad mini and AppleTV on the low-power 32nm A5 and the top tier devices on the A6.
4) Tim Cook runs a tight ship. If they moved the iPad line to the A6, you can bet there's a manufacturing cost benefit to it.
Just my armchair quarterbacking...
Use it *all year* LOL![]()
Here's my take.
1) Apple wanted to get as many products on to the Lightning connector as fast as possible so people we no longer buying 30-pin accessories for their newly purchased iPads yet having to buy something else for their new iPhones. This is key, I think, for giving the new connector needed momentum. Clean break from old to new across product lines (old 4th gen. iPod touch and iPad 2 notwithstanding, which I suspect are being made still to target enterprise demographics mainly. These products are barely advertised on Apple's website).
2) Make use of their expensive new A6 architecture as quickly as possible in the iPad to keep it competitive with all the quad-core processors coming out in Android devices (and while Apple tends not to play the out-spec game, the A6 is a very fast chip, faster than many of the quad-core Android devices).
3) Similar to above, they can keep the iPod touch, iPad mini and AppleTV on the low-power 32nm A5 and the top tier devices on the A6.
4) Tim Cook runs a tight ship. If they moved the iPad line to the A6, you can bet there's a manufacturing cost benefit to it.
Just my armchair quarterbacking...
Here's my take.
1) Apple wanted to get as many products on to the Lightning connector as fast as possible so people we no longer buying 30-pin accessories for their newly purchased iPads yet having to buy something else for their new iPhones. This is key, I think, for giving the new connector needed momentum. Clean break from old to new across product lines (old 4th gen. iPod touch and iPad 2 notwithstanding, which I suspect are being made still to target enterprise demographics mainly. These products are barely advertised on Apple's website).
2) Make use of their expensive new A6 architecture as quickly as possible in the iPad to keep it competitive with all the quad-core processors coming out in Android devices (and while Apple tends not to play the out-spec game, the A6 is a very fast chip, faster than many of the quad-core Android devices).
3) Similar to above, they can keep the iPod touch, iPad mini and AppleTV on the low-power 32nm A5 and the top tier devices on the A6.
4) Tim Cook runs a tight ship. If they moved the iPad line to the A6, you can bet there's a manufacturing cost benefit to it.
Just my armchair quarterbacking...
Pride goeth before the fall.They are already rich but seem to want to be richer.
Problem is Ipad 4 has no hype it's not really that much better than the last model.
But most of the post above is true.
The mini could have been a home run (with a competitive price and the a6). For $329 it should have the a6. The resolution is also disappointing. And now that Apple has broken the yearly upgrade I think the mini is due for an upgrade much sooner.
Today was just another indication that the post-Jobs Apple is increasingly governed by bean counters and bottom lines.
Tim Cook & Co. continue to whittle away at Apple's DNA in the name of sales. Fading are the days of the RDF and the showmanship fueled frenzy for new releases.
I used to spend time wondering what Apple would do next. Now I spend more time wondering why they did what they did...from hardware release to odd software changes. The entire operation seems to have lost some focus.
Here's my take.
1) Apple wanted to get as many products on to the Lightning connector as fast as possible so people we no longer buying 30-pin accessories for their newly purchased iPads yet having to buy something else for their new iPhones. This is key, I think, for giving the new connector needed momentum. Clean break from old to new across product lines (old 4th gen. iPod touch and iPad 2 notwithstanding, which I suspect are being made still to target enterprise demographics mainly. These products are barely advertised on Apple's website).
2) Make use of their expensive new A6 architecture as quickly as possible in the iPad to keep it competitive with all the quad-core processors coming out in Android devices (and while Apple tends not to play the out-spec game, the A6 is a very fast chip, faster than many of the quad-core Android devices).
3) Similar to above, they can keep the iPod touch, iPad mini and AppleTV on the low-power 32nm A5 and the top tier devices on the A6.
4) Tim Cook runs a tight ship. If they moved the iPad line to the A6, you can bet there's a manufacturing cost benefit to it.
Just my armchair quarterbacking...
In my opinion it makes far more sense to release the iPad now than in the spring. This is the peak buying time, it always felt odd that people will be buying iPads then a new one comes out just after the holiday season.
I can't disagree with anything you said. Steve is no longer around so Tim Cook thinks his business strategy will pay off in the long term. I have my concerns.
It seems as if you guys are never satisfied.
If Apple doesn't release something everyone goes apeshiz and whines and complains.
If they release something faster then your expecting everyone goes apeshiz and whines and complains.
Nobody complains when Sony brings out a new computer laptop every fifteen minutes. Apple is not on your schedule.
There are very good reasons to bring out the new ipad, when they did. The whole point was to introduce the lightning cables to all of the devices
Now if you don't see the need to upgrade your ipad right now, you know what will happen? Your still going to have a great Ipad to use.
I was pretty happy with todays announcements. A lot of items got updated, and right before the holidays... doesn't sound like too weird of a business decision to me.
I've always been an Apple fanboy but I can also criticize them. I have no issue with the iPad 4. I felt the 3 was a little slow especially when surfing the Internet.
The mini could have been a home run (with a competitive price and the a6). For $329 it should have the a6. The resolution is also disappointing. And now that Apple has broken the yearly upgrade I think the mini is due for an upgrade much sooner.
The 13" Pro is nice except the crazy price with small SSD and intel graphics.
I wish Apple spent more time on quality control but that's me. Oh and the Apple tax is back with the $329 Mini. Everything about it is small except the price ha.
I've always been an Apple fanboy but I can also criticize them. I have no issue with the iPad 4. I felt the 3 was a little slow especially when surfing the Internet.
The mini could have been a home run (with a competitive price and the a6). For $329 it should have the a6. The resolution is also disappointing. And now that Apple has broken the yearly upgrade I think the mini is due for an upgrade much sooner.
The 13" Pro is nice except the crazy price with small SSD and intel graphics.
I wish Apple spent more time on quality control but that's me. Oh and the Apple tax is back with the $329 Mini. Everything about it is small except the price ha.
I disagree. Tim's not doing a good job at all. Apple is going down the drain. Ipad mini is crap.
Tim is all about hustling. You gotta know that. Steve was about trying new things to help the society. (this is just my opinion).
This. Tim's running it like the MBA he is. More products. Cheaper quality. More money.
The dumbest thing is that he doesn't realize he needs to put out useful, cutting edge products, with the finest quality.
He's trying to sell the Apple brand, not a great product.
Guys a loser. I wish Steve Jobs was here.