Really?
Except the iPhone manufacturing/ scratching issue perhaps, I wonder what makes you say cheaper quality.
if scratching issue / scuffing issue = cheaper quality, then...
"Except cheaper quality, I wonder what makes you say cheaper quality."
Really?
Except the iPhone manufacturing/ scratching issue perhaps, I wonder what makes you say cheaper quality.
Personally Steve was not a good man. But he was a great businessman and executor. Although he was cold and cruel personally, his customers felt the care and respect.
In contrast, personally Tim is nice and gentle, but you can judge his current business decisions.
So the stock going up $200 in one year is going down the drain? As a large share holder Im very happy with Tim.![]()
if scratching issue / scuffing issue = cheaper quality, then...
"Except cheaper quality, I wonder what makes you say cheaper quality."![]()
Here's my take.
1) Apple wanted to get as many products on to the Lightning connector as fast as possible so people we no longer buying 30-pin accessories for their newly purchased iPads yet having to buy something else for their new iPhones. This is key, I think, for giving the new connector needed momentum. Clean break from old to new across product lines (old 4th gen. iPod touch and iPad 2 notwithstanding, which I suspect are being made still to target enterprise demographics mainly. These products are barely advertised on Apple's website).
2) Make use of their expensive new A6 architecture as quickly as possible in the iPad to keep it competitive with all the quad-core processors coming out in Android devices (and while Apple tends not to play the out-spec game, the A6 is a very fast chip, faster than many of the quad-core Android devices).
3) Similar to above, they can keep the iPod touch, iPad mini and AppleTV on the low-power 32nm A5 and the top tier devices on the A6.
4) Tim Cook runs a tight ship. If they moved the iPad line to the A6, you can bet there's a manufacturing cost benefit to it.
Just my armchair quarterbacking...
Consistent, stable and evolving.
I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying.
They should have held back on the iPad "4" release for the Spring.
The 13" rMPB should have released alongside the 15".
The iPad Mini should have been 7"
iPhone should be on 8 month release cycle.
Steve jobs is rolling in his grave now. A yr ago before I had an iPad, I initially wondered why the large size, but after having one, it totally made sense. And I respected apple for NOT following the competition. Now that they've succumbed to competing when the iPad far surpasses is mind boggling.
I can't disagree with anything you said. Steve is no longer around so Tim Cook thinks his business strategy will pay off in the long term. I have my concerns.
He's not very good. The ipad mini proves this. The iPhone 5 quality is atrocious. Apple is deteriorating under his leadership. No question about it.
Because Steve was SO good when he was right, we forget some of his failures. (Lisa, NEXT, Cube, to name a few) What this feels like more than anything is the kind of product refresh lineup we use to get a MacWorld Expo SF in January, before Apple pulled out. Same sensory overload...
Here's my take.
1) Apple wanted to get as many products on to the Lightning connector as fast as possible so people we no longer buying 30-pin accessories for their newly purchased iPads yet having to buy something else for their new iPhones. This is key, I think, for giving the new connector needed momentum. Clean break from old to new across product lines (old 4th gen. iPod touch and iPad 2 notwithstanding, which I suspect are being made still to target enterprise demographics mainly. These products are barely advertised on Apple's website).
2) Make use of their expensive new A6 architecture as quickly as possible in the iPad to keep it competitive with all the quad-core processors coming out in Android devices (and while Apple tends not to play the out-spec game, the A6 is a very fast chip, faster than many of the quad-core Android devices).
3) Similar to above, they can keep the iPod touch, iPad mini and AppleTV on the low-power 32nm A5 and the top tier devices on the A6.
4) Tim Cook runs a tight ship. If they moved the iPad line to the A6, you can bet there's a manufacturing cost benefit to it.
Just my armchair quarterbacking...
Releasing the Ipad on a 6 month cycle, but not being different enough to the casual consumer from the last one, AND not letting the 1 year hype build to the point it will create a frenzy like new Apple Products usually do. Potentially pissing off the people who purchased iPad in the last 6 months. The Holiday season will help though with sales.
Ipad Mini being a bit too close in size to the Ipad IMO (should have been 7 inches which increases portability and ppi at same res), yet being priced too high relative to the 7 inch competition and not being Retina. Mini at $249 might not have brought them the big margins, but would have DESTROYED the competition. At $329 Retina would likely do it too. And Ipod Touch at $300 and Ipad Mini $329? Where does the ipod nano even fit, it's too weak in comparison to the Touch and not super cheap.
Too many product announcements in a short time. They just announced the new Iphone, new Ipod touch, new Ipad and ipad mini, along with the other more minor announcements today in a 1 month time period. Spreading the announcements over the year helps keep the momentum/hype machine strong. It used to be highly anticipated announcements about 1 "magical" product that commanded a whole event.
If anything needed an accelerated upgrade cycle, it is the iphone, NOT the iPad. The iPad is still regarded as the undisputed, unchallenged king of the tablet world, and the only viable choice on the premium end. The iphone has many strong challengers and they "fall behind" spec wise faster on smartphones by the time the next one comes out.
Their products are leaking like crazy now, to the point that we know most of the details before the announcement. this has been blamed on China, etc...but don't recall it happening under Jobs with the exception of someone losing the iphone 4 at the bar, not really a "leak"
I have been the BIGGEST Apple fanboy over the years, to the point people were shocked to see me trying an S3 (I later returned it and stayed with Iphone 5).
Pride goeth before the fall.
Apple these days is reminding more and more of Microsoft circa late-90's. Didn't we used to make fun of them?![]()
I still remember when Apple said they were putting the Cube on ice.
You never know when it may make a return.![]()
Tim knows what he's doing. The fact that so many cant understand this just proves you are simplistic consumers and have no business knowledge.