Curious. This entire time I was discussing the imperative for stronger consumer protection, stronger public regulation over the tech (namely, Apple) sector implementing consumer-hostile platforms, and as needed, anti-trust action on behalf of the public interest — not a wholesale halting of the subjective concept of “progress” (whose progress?, to what end? and so on).
Whilst the above is a worthwhile hypothesis for another topic elsewhere and one where we can all discuss “civilizations” (note: there isn’t solely one in 2020, no matter how folks wish to play that reductive card), I am straining to connect the relationship between the necessity for stronger consumer protection from the largely unregulated tech sector and, uh, the rupture/breaking point of (a) “civilization”. Help me with those dots, if you could? Thanks.
[Also, since you mentioned it: in the early 1920s, the interwar period, folks widely followed a much lower path with respect to their relationship with technology (e.g., the “science” of eugenics, the proliferation of chemical weaponry, the systemization of genocide with manufacturing tech, open-stream manufacturing and waste, using marginalized populations to conduct medical “experiments”, the invention of planned obsolescence, the feasibility of nuclear weaponry, and so on). Consequently, this necessitated a forceful, but still reactive response at a multi-state level to slow down this path (it couldn’t halt the path or “put the genie back into the bottle”). The evidentiary outcome (that is, the result, the products) of that path was rapidly seen as unfathomable and abhorrent. Even so, even after a giant war, many of these practices continued onward with a more sotto voce tone, some to this very day.]