Care to back that up, MR?The vulnerability they described does not work on Macs built after 2008, but it is likely that similar hacks exist for newer machines.
That's really disturbing, I always assumed that the power to the camera and LED was hard-wired as a single circuit.
Prior to 2009 this feature was firmware controlled, that is what the researchers have messed with and how they got it to work. The models after 2008 do not use firmware anymore and the LED sits directly on top of the power feed to the camera. There is no switch to control the LED anymore, it's on when the power is on.
If the construction was changed so radically on models after 2008 and the part containing the vulnerability that this hack uses doesn't exist anymore (no firmware control anymore), how is it "likely that similar hacks exist for newer machines."? So far I have only found hardware hacks which involve opening up the camera unit and removing the LED.
I would say this: It can be done. Because I was a victim of this kind of hack.
And they were laughing.
I used to watch this movie called, "I know what you did last summer" and boy..was that crazy...
People still think it' safe to trust apple? Quality of products became downgrade...what happened?...who knows...
Aren't Macs what the article was about and the exploit is published for?On a Mac?
Just because it was published now doesn't meant folks in the "black" (NSA) or black hat community didn't have the capability a lot sooner.But it took people five years to figure this out.
No more video chatting for me.![]()
The article and the exploit, yes. But are you seriously suggesting that nobody, ever, posted anything that has nothing to do with the discussion thread?Aren't Macs what the article was about and the exploit is published for?
That's why I asked if this happened on a Mac.Just because it was published now doesn't meant folks in the "black" (NSA) or black hat community didn't have the capability a lot sooner.
And it doesn't seem that anybody knew about this being possible on a Mac.
Again, I don't think that's in evidence. There are plenty of things that go on on the internet's dark underbelly that the general population isn't aware of.
It's fine to ask if hleewell's incident happened on a Mac, but it's clear at this point that it can be done at least for older Macs and older OSes.
It has nothing to do with the OS, it has to do with that specific hardware.
I take it none of you all have watched Person of Interest? I have already accepted that anything with a camera or microphone in it is being recorded at all times and stored somewhere for use by the government. The telephone companies also work hand and hand with several agencies and give your calls over no questions asked. Not to mention your phone can be cloned within seconds. There are cameras in places you wouldn't even begin to suspect. It is part of life these days, you are being watched without your consent whether you like it or not. Don't do anything bad and you'll be okay.
People might not be doing anything bad but are doing embarrassing things. What then?
The easiest way to protect against is NOT by using sticky tape time and time again. Instead it's closing the lid if you are doing anything compromising