Agreed. Had to buy AirPods because nearly every other brand of bluetooth headphones refused to connect to my MacBook Pro or iMac.Not a new problem! About half of my MacBook Pro models in the past years had serious problems with the built in Bluetooth. Sadly its also not just an apple problem, my desktop PC with MSI B550 mainboard has the same issue. How in the world can it be that nobody checks this??? If internal bluetooth is difficult because of interference or whatever, just don't put it in there and advertise it!!
You are supposed to capital every word other than And/The/Or.... for titles. You can see "the" is not capital. This is an article title, so every other word except a select few gets capitalized.OT:
Why Does Macrumors Still Think It's A Good Idea To Capitalize Every Word Of A Heading?
It's not making things more legible, for sure.
At least it is being addressed. With other manufacturers, we would still be trying to get in touch with customer no service.The fact that it took Apple two months to acknowledge the problem, let alone address it, is ridiculous.
If they were not planning to release an M1X version of the Mac mini, why keep the Intel ones around at the moment? Every Intel Mac will be replaced with Apple Silicon. So the "higher end" Mac mini's with Intel, 4 TB ports and 64GB of RAM are still available. Those need to be replaced with Apple Silicon. If Apple had no intention of making a "high end" Mac mini, then why keep the Intel ones around?You must be new to Mac. Mini are rarely released, you’ll be waiting for years for Gen 2.
That's Apple for you, still not acknowledging the same issue with the 2018 MM, but you know, it's Apple, let's not say bad things about them or the die-hards will be along to dislike the comments and call for blood.The fact that it took Apple two months to acknowledge the problem, let alone address it, is ridiculous.
Because there are people still buying them, not everyone is interested in M1 right now.If they were not planning to release an M1X version of the Mac mini, why keep the Intel ones around at the moment?
That makes no sense. Apple is going to have ALL Intel version replaced with M1. Why keep the Mac mini around, thus requiring support longer, if they are NOT planning to release an M* Mac mini with 64GB of RAM?Because there are people still buying them, not everyone is interested in M1 right now.
Why do you care what Apple does with the Intel models? Is it worth arguing over?That makes no sense. Apple is going to have ALL Intel version replaced with M1. Why keep the Mac mini around, thus requiring support longer, if they are NOT planning to release an M* Mac mini with 64GB of RAM?
To any business. You have not answered the question - Why keep the Intel Mac mini around - requiring LONGER ongoing support for Intel Mac minis for years if they aren't planning to upgrade it?To you.
I am really starting to get irritated with this website. Did you see who I responded to?Why do you care what Apple does with the Intel models? Is it worth arguing over?
Some people and businesses want Intel (for whatever reason). Apple has Intel on the shelf. More sales more money for Apple.
The forum member who said 2 years doesn't know what he is talking about. He was just guessing. My point is, it truly doesn't matter what Apple does with the Intel on the shelf or if they continue making Intel for a while to service other contracts and needs elsewhere, in my opinion. Like me, you are focused on M1, which is a good thing. If Apple can continue to make money with Intel for a while, fine by me.I am really starting to get irritated with this website. Did you see who I responded to?
"You will need to wait for 2 years for an updated Mac mini"
I replied with "no because it makes no sense for Apple to keep an Intel Mac mini around if they aren't replacing the higher end ones later this year".
At what point am I sitting here arguing? We really cannot have conversations on this website anymore?
Apple doesn't want to support both Apple Silicon and Intel forever, so why keep the Intel Mac mini's around if they aren't going to replace the higher ones very soon?
M1 is limited to 16GB of RAM. Why can't Apple replace the higher end Intel Mac minis later this year with the M1X or whatever that supports more RAM?
But we certainly cannot discuss things? I made two responses and you are jumping on my "why argue about it".The forum member who said 2 years doesn't know what he is talking about. He was just guessing. My point is, it truly doesn't matter what Apple does with the Intel on the shelf or if they continue making Intel for a while to service other contracts and needs elsewhere, in my opinion. Like me, you are focused on M1, which is a good thing. If Apple can continue to make money with Intel for a while, fine by me.
All I did was reply with my opinion. I didn't say you couldn't discuss things.But we certainly cannot discuss things? I made two responses and you are jumping on my "why argue about it".
To any business. You have not answered the question - Why keep the Intel Mac mini around - requiring LONGER ongoing support for Intel Mac minis for years if they aren't planning to upgrade it?
And the longer they sell the Intel Mac mini, the longer they will need to support it. If there is no intention of replacing the Intel Mac mini 64GB of RAM, Apple would have removed it so they wouldn't need to support it AS LONG.I did answer, people still want and are still buying intel machines. Apple has made it clear that it will continue to support both versions. How long for? Years certainly but not forever.
Even with the switch to M1 on the Mac Mini in November last year, you can't just turn off support for intel machines people bought in the days, weeks and months prior.
There will still be tens of millions of intel macs for many years to come.
And the longer they sell the Intel Mac mini, the longer they will need to support it. If there is no intention of replacing the Intel Mac mini 64GB of RAM, Apple would have removed it so they wouldn't need to support it AS LONG.