A lot of people will find this a far better value offering than paying Apple for its Apps + iCloud on the side.
It was my first thought upon reading this.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Some Apple Apps Will No Longer Receive Every New Feature Without a Subscription
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
A lot of people will find this a far better value offering than paying Apple for its Apps + iCloud on the side.
It was my first thought upon reading this.
The whole point of apple’s ecosystem is that you switch over to escape from microsoft/adobe ******tification
Apple isn't charging for its Office-adjacent apps. They are just charging for specific AI-enabled features, specifically "a new Content Hub provides access to high-quality photos and graphics, and there are new premium templates and themes". Outside of that everything existing remains free for Pages, Numbers and Keynote.
If you seriously think that the free versions aren’t going away then I have a bridge to sell you.
Are you shipping me? I guess time to move over to Google docs full time.
A little off-topic, but I think the updated logos all look great. Nice job by the design team on them.
I wish all companies would lock all of their AI features behind a subscription so I can opt out by not subscribing
Business doesn’t require extracting every last possible penny from customers, and it’s not “charity” to refrain from doing so.
Well, I hate it. Especially the iWork app (Pages, Numbers, Keynote) receiving no new features without the subscription. They want to monetize their AI push, and even the apps that have always COME FREE with the OS as part of a value package of buying a Mac over a PC (where a fully functioning MS Office does not come for free with Windows) are being hit with this. Before you say "but it's only for the AI features, if you don't want that, it's still free!", I say how long will that last? Do we really think Apple is going to forever maintain 2 versions of the apps as the AI gets embedded deeper and deeper into the apps? (and for the record, I want zero AI features in these apps) I have to assume this is a sign that in the long run even the basic iWork apps will not only not be free (even for basic usage), but not buyable at all, and will only be available by subscription, along with the larger titles like FCP and Logi eventually going subscription only as well.
I don't say this in a vacuum, as I've recently seen many software titles going from purchased license, to subscription with a license purchase option, to subscription only, in every area, from image processing/editing app, audio apps of all kinds, utilities, network tools, publishing, just everywhere. I hate everything about the coming "everything is a subscription, you own nothing" software world.
I don't say this in a vacuum, as I've recently seen many software titles going from purchased license, to subscription with a license purchase option, to subscription only, in every area, from image processing/editing app, audio apps of all kinds, utilities, network tools, publishing, just everywhere. I hate everything about the coming "everything is a subscription, you own nothing" software world.
Last edited:
A subscription model for AI features makes sense when the AI is being run in the cloud and there is a need to pay for that compute.
Requiring payment for AI services that runs locally makes no sense, then it's strictly paying for development of the features, which until now has been financed by the initial one-time purchase.
Tim Cook is now joining all the other CEO's out there in wanting an increased, predictable revenue stream.
Yes, some revenue would make sense to support ongoing development, but look at Adobe's annual profit for the past five years, they are raking in the money, not just merely supporting development.
Similarly one can look at Apple's profit, especially for the 'services' branch where the subscriptions are... and the App Store.
It's about the Benjamins.
Is this why AI features have been mostly missing from FCP? Until Apple could put together a subscription to charge for them?
-R
Requiring payment for AI services that runs locally makes no sense, then it's strictly paying for development of the features, which until now has been financed by the initial one-time purchase.
Tim Cook is now joining all the other CEO's out there in wanting an increased, predictable revenue stream.
Yes, some revenue would make sense to support ongoing development, but look at Adobe's annual profit for the past five years, they are raking in the money, not just merely supporting development.
Similarly one can look at Apple's profit, especially for the 'services' branch where the subscriptions are... and the App Store.
It's about the Benjamins.
Is this why AI features have been mostly missing from FCP? Until Apple could put together a subscription to charge for them?
-R
Coming soon: Apple One Pro and Apple One Pro Max.
Apple One is one subscription for everything. Apple One Pro will be everything and more. And Apple One Pro Max will…just cost more
i am scared one day apple will charge me for keeping the movies i bought with them in their server.
I’m not sure anyone is ditching LPX over this. It’s the one pro app not affected as a standalone app and access to the new features. At least for now…
It's so incredibly sad how they shot themselves in the foot so badly with FCP X (I'm sure you know the story, I won't reiterate it here) and basically ceded the entire pro industry to Premiere and Avid, and they've never recovered much marketshare since.
If you want to get preemptively upset over something that hasn’t been announced you are obviously free to do so, but I don’t think that’s necessarily a good use of your time.
I have most of those Apps already. I do not like subscriptions so I will keep what I have. Recently I have shut down Adobe after 35 years of Photoshop because of subscriptions. Been on FCP since FCPX. Went to Pixelmator after leaving Photoshop.
Completely agree. Absolutely fine with paywalling the AI features and other clip art libs that I will never use. Let those who want those features pay for them. You couldn’t pay me to use AI.
I really don't know if they're serious or not with their claims 🤷♂️ I'm just pointing out to an alternative.
Thanks for the detailed reply. And I definitely agree with your last sentence.
I currently have a refurbished (by Apple) M1 Mac Mini with 16GB of RAM and a 1TB solid state hard drive. This is my first-ever Mac and it's perfectly adequate for my current needs though sometimes a little laggy (programs take many finger-drumming seconds longer to launch than on my old PC; Word slows to a crawl when dealing with very big files and it seems to be getting worse; etc.).
My reasons for upgrading are two-fold. First, I'm preparing for my (late) retirement in a couple of years and would like to upgrade to a system that can see me through the rest of my life while I can easily afford it. Second, as part of those preparations, I'm about to switch to a much smaller home office and desk and space will be at a premium. Also, I'm totally fed up with the M1 Mini's lack of ports on the front, another glaring example of Apple's tendency to favour form over function.
