But his conclusion did logically follow his argument. You're digging yourself in deeper.
Apple released a support doc for the "sticky crown" problem. No company, not even apple, releases a support doc for spurious anecdotal problems. Do you not know what spurious means?
No, according to me, you should be mad at apple for picking acc as a parts supplier since a number of their haptic motors are faulty. Those faulty motors are slowing the product roll out. Having your product release slowed by a faulty component is a real problem and not a spurious one.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/apple-watch-faulty-taptic-engine-slows-roll-out-1430339460
You should be mad at apple for designing a digital crown that accumulates sweat and dust then becomes difficult to move or unmovable without a good rinse.
http://business.financialpost.com/b...cky-and-apple-says-put-it-under-running-water
Why this need to call everything your don't agree with FUD.
Not hearing a peep about iphone 6 issues?
http://appleinsider.com/articles/14...g-issues-possibly-tied-to-large-app-libraries
http://www.valuewalk.com/2014/10/iphone-6-issues-bendgate-hairgate-dyegate-burngate/
He did not. I know how to read.
Seriously, think you need to get the definitions for: FUD, non sequitur and concern trolling, that's basically the whole content of his posts.
As for the rest,
Six months ago, when the Iphone got released, a flood of posts said the same thing your pal is claiming about the "bendgate" idiocy. Apple this, Apple that, design flaw, etc, etc. Then, the crowd switched for 6 months to thousand posts about the watches' crappy battery life and its price and how Apple is for suckers and it won't sell (sic); on and on and on. Of course, with the battery life being spectacular for such a small device and sales being great, the ADHD crowd had to move on to some other shiny target. Doesn't matter what is really, as long as it is "shiny" (firefly reference obviously).
It is a good thing I don't sell Apple stock on their say so.
As for the rest, anecdotes and online squeaky wheel posts means nothing to me.
Someone who makes assertion such as him, has to prove them.
Demonstrate
- Significant prevalence; will it happen to many owners?
- Widespread scope; will it occur no matter how you use the product?
- Severity of issue; are most devices with this broken?
- That it's non user serviceable; can the user fix it himself?
- That Servicing/helping people with this issue is not being done.
- A design fault (what bud up there has plainly affirmed, without proof, just like people were saying in September about the phone, when the bending idiocy occurred).
You can claim that this is an extraordinary burden.
Well, when people make big claims, they need big proofs.
Otherwise, it is FUD.
I'm not going to get further into this because I've already spend 100+ posts on this kind of thing 7 months ago and this will basically be a retread ; you can search them for my opinion on all that matter.