What does? A speculative article on a non important detail of a brand new services launch?Too big. Too greedy. This happens.
Yeah. So doomed.
What does? A speculative article on a non important detail of a brand new services launch?Too big. Too greedy. This happens.
farewell williamsI hate Tim Cook. I wonder why you assumed I love him. You sound like every other member on this forum that is extremely biased against Tim's Apple and immediately think those that disagree with you love Tim Cook. No. At least I'm objective with my reasonings.
Also you said "welcome to the new apple" which implies this "new apple" is related to time. Don't try to walk back on your statements.
Feel free to reply, but I won't be reading anymore of your statements. You refuse to admit wrong, so I won't waste anymore of my time talking with you.
Wow. Ok then. Thanks for that tangent, completely unrelated to the topic at hand.
Tinfoil hat hand made or professionally sourced?
Agreed … I don't see how Apple will make a paid news/publication service survive with so much free content across the Internet. Heck, many people get their news in 140 character bytes from Twitter anyway![]()
What can you expect, this guy introduced this service:
![]()
My reason for saying this is that Apple’s services seem basically geared for the mass market, and that is who they will appeal to.
It’s the same story with the Apple Watch and AirPods all over again. The so-called “tech experts” criticise these products on issues that simply don’t matter to their intended audience. What’s even more astounding is that the success of these products has caused the critics to instead double down on their own prejudices, rather than re-examine them.
So while you all quibble over these minute matters, you are all missing the whole point of Apple News - which is to address a very real consumer problem of finding accurate news in a world where Facebook and Twitter perpetuate conspiracy theories and junk news on a massive scale. And Apple is doing this with human curation paired with clever algorithms at a time when the rest of the tech industry is saying “just algorithm all the things!”
So the myriad of criticisms this forum loves to level at Apple, they may well be valid for the small vocal minority here, but that’s just that. There is value in this, and I believe it is value that the target market will be perfectly willing to pay for.
Tim Cook may have gotten Apple to 1 trillion, but Steve job would have gotten it to 2 trillion without alienating us Apple fans.
They've done the biggest digital music store in the world.
They run the most lucrative and impactful App Store in the world.
iCloud is now a huge success story.
Apple Music is the biggest music subscription service in the US, and also expanding rapidly around the world.
Apple Pay has been a game changer.
And services revenue continues to soar upwards to the delight of investors.
Yeah Apple can't do services.![]()
its nice for his ego - but what exactly did this one trillion contribute to the world???
It's easier to resurrect Steve Jobs as a straw man argument against Tim Cook than to provide real analysis.And SJ blew rainbow bubbles from his flute? Apple is as predatory as any large company.
Always has been. You might educate yourself on Apple’s beginnings and how Apple has been cutthroat throughout its history, just like Google and Microsoft. .
whats wrong with apple watch and airpods?
watch was just a failure when starting but WE the "tech experts" made it happening - even tim apple recognized it at a keynote.
airpods were cool from start - no one knows how this happend
so wheres your hate coming from against us "tech-experts"?
These houses that used to put those magazines available should just understand to replace them with ipads. Taking away paper versions and not replace them with digital versions is making their service worse.Go to a salon and see those 50 magazines sprawled out on the table to pacify those waiting to get their hair done. Go into an IT business, sit down, sip on free lattes, bagels and scan through a dozen or more subscriptions curtailed to those waiting.
Well, most people now sit on their phones and don't pick them up anymore.
This is just semantics, but "to scan PDFs" ?!?Magazine publishers need to use tools to scan PDFs and convert them into individual articles and advertisements, but the technology is said to be so buggy that each issue needs to be "effectively copy- and design-edited all over again."
My guess is that the "regular" News application will either be removed or downgraded to a level to make News+ more appealing.doubt it, they need apple's broad market penetration rather than sticking it on their own.
i can't comment on the + but the regular news has been alright, i still prefer google news to some degree but if i have to live with just apple news its not such a bad thing.
there you have it, the new apple under tim cook, but we are trolls and haters, i remember apple used to be real good at costumer support but just like everything else in apple, even that has declined, but of course that doesn’t have to do nothing with apple leadership, right. so not only the service sucks but also the support, welcome to the new apple, we only care about taking your money, after that you are in your own
things will have to go bad and from bad to worse untill we finally get rid of tim so then things can go back to be good once again
oh yes also cool because mr cook is not cool at all
the men simply kills the asmosphere with his precense
i think that might happen too once apple's earning report comes in and they have jack to show for. if that does happen then i'll just google news section, theres too many free publication out there.My guess is that the "regular" News application will either be removed or downgraded to a level to make News+ more appealing.
The idea is great. The execution extremely disappointing. Why does a company with such enormous resources roll out such a sloppy product? Inconsistent format, confusing navigation, wild variation in presentation quality, crazy use of add space vs content, bare bone features and obvious lack of standards. They didn't put their heart into this one.