Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The only thing hindering the positive direct Apple has been heading towards for the last fews years - really started in 2019 with the 16in MBP, Mac Pro, then MBA update in 2020 - is global supply chain constraints.

Anyone who thinks Apple is heading in the wrong direction ain't attached to the operative reality. Especially when you're staking this claim to ultimately a niche, low-volume product and not all the high-quality core, high-volume products they've been releasing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RogerWade
That other companies do it too doesn’t mean it’s fine that this stuff should be so complicated and should be left to the “fix it later” mentality of the tech industry.

You're putting words in my mouth. I never said it should be complicated. I responded to another poster that asked why displays needed firmware updates when the their display from 15 years ago never needed one.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: RogerWade
The new Samsung M8 looks like a far better option for most people. Especially considering it's only $700.

4k @ 32" pretty cool if you don't mind pixels that look like lego bricks
 
4k @ 32" pretty cool if you don't mind pixels that look like lego bricks
I'm convinced by people saying things like "I like the studio display but wish it was 32 inches instead" that I must have superhuman vision.

There is a reason why Apple's 32in display is another oddball resolution (6K). In fact, there is a reason why every Apple desktop display on the market right now has an oddball resolution (24in @ 4.5K, 27in @ 5K, and 32in @ 6K) and it is points per inch. They each are 218ppi.

I'm convinced I just must have better vision than most because I can tell the difference between what you get on an iMac 5K v. my Dell 27in 4K.
 
I'm still disgusted that Apple hijacked the M1 27" iMac to make it just a monitor and we are all still waiting for it . . . I'm considering moving to a Mac mini and forget about iMac's altogether. . . Sub 24" iMacs are unsat . . .
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
4k @ 32" pretty cool if you don't mind pixels that look like lego bricks
Awwww...you're just spoiled. I remember CRT monitors that really did have large pixels. Most people are going to be fine using a 4K 32" monitor to web surf, video chat, watch YouTube and Netflix, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Awwww...you're just spoiled. I remember CRT monitors that really did have large pixels. Most people are going to be fine using a 4K 32" monitor to web surf, video chat, watch YouTube and Netflix, etc.
This is a website principally for people looking to buy new Apple devices. We’re mostly all spoiled first-world citizens here.
 
I can't agree with this. There have been many, many cases of Apple shipping products that aren't perfect or that have design flaws.

Poor phrasing on my part. Software that ships with devices is always going to have bugs. The question is whether it is a major bug that affects everyone (antenna gate) or a bug that affects some, but not all users. Antenna gate affected everyone, as does the studio display camera issues. Shipping with a major defect that you know is going to get blasted by reviewers is unusual. As for design flaws that tends to be in the eye of the beholder, usually. Linus (Youtube) just blasted the Mac Studio because it was not upgradable. But he loves to build computers from scratch and play with their innards so he considers it a design flaw. I don't.
 
Poor phrasing on my part. Software that ships with devices is always going to have bugs. The question is whether it is a major bug that affects everyone (antenna gate) or a bug that affects some, but not all users. Antenna gate affected everyone, as does the studio display camera issues. Shipping with a major defect that you know is going to get blasted by reviewers is unusual. As for design flaws that tends to be in the eye of the beholder, usually. Linus (Youtube) just blasted the Mac Studio because it was not upgradable. But he loves to build computers from scratch and play with their innards so he considers it a design flaw. I don't.
But antenna-gate wasn’t a bug, it was largely an engineering issue. Apple covered themselves by saying that they weren’t alone in this issue, and they go away with it because they proved that you can disrupt wireless signals on any device if you hold them a certain way. But the disruption caused to the iPhone 4 antenna system was clear and obvious - Apple would have absolutely known.

This was proven when Apple redesigned the antennas in the subsequent enclosure and touted the performance of the wireless reception.

The Mac mini has antenna issues, too. This has been present since the current enclosure was first released and Apple has done nothing to fix it, despite being aware of it.

The revision of the original G3 iMac had overheating issues because Apple removed the fans, believing instead that convection cooling was adequate.

The G5 Mac Pro had design faults with the water cooling system.

The iMac G5 had design faults with the power supply, capacitors and yes cooling too.

The enclosure of the titanium PowerBook and white plastic MacBook cracked during normal use.

The MacBook had ‘flex gate’ and, once again, Apple didn’t budge on it until there was a class action lawsuit. Same with the butterfly keyboards (A silicone membrane to make it quieter? Give me a break!)

The list goes on and those of us old enough to have used Apple products for a few decades will be all too aware.
 
I can't agree with this. There have been many, many cases of Apple shipping products that aren't perfect or that have design flaws.

I was comparing Apple's Quality control and design ethic to Samsungs' when I wrote my poor statement. Take the debacle of Samsungs' folding display. They put things out before they are fully baked. Apple is still working on a folding display and won't release it until it is (don't know the word to use here - fully baked, as flawless as is possible, your suggestion?). Samsungs' facial recognition I understand still isn't as good as Apples, etc.

But antenna-gate wasn’t a bug, it was largely an engineering issue.

Guess we define things differently. A bug is "an error in a computer program or system". It can be a hardware or software bug. All bugs are products of engineering, even if unintentional. No engineering, no product, no bugs.

The list goes on and those of us old enough to have used Apple products for a few decades will be all too aware.

I fall into this category.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.